Antithrombin restriction in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ARES): A multidisciplinary approach.

Background: Antithrombin (AT) replacement is occasionally utilized in the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-associated heparin resistance. Although past studies emphasized the high costs and limited clinical benefit of AT supplementation,  guidance on strategies to prevent unnecessary use remain lacking.Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the cost, efficacy, and safety outcomes three years pre- and post-implementation of an AT restriction protocol in adult ECMO patients. The primary endpoint was the cost spent on anticoagulation and AT normalized to ECMO duration. Secondary endpoints included thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes.Results: 175 patients were included for analysis (pre-restriction protocol n = 87; post-restriction protocol n = 88). Implementation of the restriction resulted in complete elimination of AT use and significantly reduced the primary cost endpoint from $1009.20 to $42.99 per ECMO day (p < .001). There was no significant change in occurrence of new Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) (p = .099). Those in the pre-implementation group had significantly higher rates of transfusions (p < .001) and ISTH major bleeding (p < .001). Outcomes remained significant after exclusion of patients with coronavirus infections.Conclusion: Results of this study exemplify how AT restriction can be successfully implemented to decrease anticoagulation-associated costs without jeopardizing the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ECMO patients.

Evolving impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung transplant recipients: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the disease course has changed as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have mutated. We compared COVID-19-related clinical outcomes in LTRs at different stages of the pandemic. We also identified risk factors for developing severe COVID-19 independent of the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study of LTRs with COVID-19 used Cox regression analyses and bootstrapping to identify factors affecting COVID-19 severity. RESULTS: Between March 2020 and August 2022, 195 LTRs were diagnosed with COVID-19, almost half (89 [45.6%]) during the Omicron period. A total of 113 (58.5%) LTRs were hospitalized and 47 (24.1%) died. Age >65 years increased the risk of hospitalization and death. Although infection with the Omicron variant was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization, the median length of hospital stay (10 days, [interquartile range, 5-19]) was similar between the variants. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death were more common with the Delta variant but comparable between the original, Alpha, and Omicron variants. Remdesivir and molnupiravir reduced the risk of hospitalization, and monoclonal antibody therapy reduced the risk of ICU admission, intubation, and death. Vaccination and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab-cilgavimab did not significantly reduce COVID-19-related ICU admission, intubation, or mortality among LTRs. CONCLUSIONS: LTRs with COVID-19 continue to have high hospitalization rates and prolonged hospital stays, despite the reduced virulence of the Omicron variant. More effective PrEP and therapeutic interventions for COVID-19 among vulnerable patient groups are needed.

Critical care considerations in the post-operative period for the lung transplant patient.

The post-operative management of a lung transplant recipient can be complex. Several factors including medical comorbidities, severity of illness at the time of transplant and intra-operative events can affect graft function and overall survival. During the immediate post-operative period, it becomes essential for early recognition of disease-specific sequelae as they can impact the patient's outcome and quality of life. This often necessitates a multidisciplinary team of pulmonologists, surgeons, medical sub-specialists as well as skilled nurses and respiratory therapists familiar with caring for these patients. Based on the experiences of a high-volume transplant center, this chapter will outline key considerations within each organ system in this specific patient population in the Intensive Care Unit.

A comparison of disrupted sleep patterns in women with cancer-related fatigue and postmenopausal women without cancer.

PURPOSE: Fatigue and disrupted sleep often coexist and both are prominent clinical problems in cancer affecting quality of life. Disrupted sleep patterns are likely related to cancer-related fatigue. The relationship needs further investigation. This study aimed to characterize and compare disrupted sleep patterns in fatigued breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with postmenopausal women without a history of cancer. Anxiety levels were also examined. METHODS: Data for this secondary analysis came from two studies. Global sleep quality and state anxiety were self-reported by 30 fatigued female breast cancer chemotherapy outpatients and 32 non-cancer postmenopausal women using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, respectively. RESULTS: Fatigued breast cancer patients showed significant sleep difficulties, characterized by prolonged sleep onset latency (M=54.3, SD=49.2 min) and frequent nighttime awakenings, despite 40% of the patients using sleep medications three or more times a week. Compared to the non-cancer comparison group, fatigued patients reported significantly longer sleep latency (p=0.041), more use of sleep medications (p=0.006), and higher total PSQI scores (p=0.005). State anxiety levels did not differ between the two groups (p=0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep is disrupted in fatigued breast cancer women undergoing chemotherapy. Nearly all fatigued patients (97%) had trouble sleeping (global PSQI scores>5), indicating significant difficulties in overall sleep quality among those patients. Knowledge of the nature of sleep disruption among cancer patients may contribute to CRF symptom management leading to tailored interventions designed to improve sleep quality in cancer patients thereby managing fatigue and improving quality of life.