Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Lupus ; 26(3): 277-281, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27440459

ABSTRACT

The American Academy of Ophthalmology published in 2011 revised recommendations regarding screening for hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) toxicity. We aimed to assess implementation of these recommendations by rheumatologists and ophthalmologists. A questionnaire regarding screening practices for HCQ toxicity was distributed among all members of the Israeli societies of Rheumatology and Ophthalmology. A total of 128 physicians responded to the questionnaire (rheumatologists: 60, ophthalmologists: 68). Only 5% of the rheumatologists and 15% of the ophthalmologists are aware of ophthalmologic assessments recommended for baseline and follow-up evaluation. When an abnormal test is detected, even if inappropriate for HCQ toxicity screening, 60% of the responders recommend cessation of therapy. Only 13% of the responders recommend first follow-up after five years for patients without risk factors; the remainder recommend more frequent testing. Ninety-six percent of the responders are not aware of all of the known risk factors for HCQ toxicity. Use of inappropriate tests to detect HCQ retinal toxicity may lead to unnecessary cessation of beneficial treatment with risk of disease flare, while lack of consideration of risk factors may put patients at risk for toxicity. These results emphasize the importance of implementing the recommendations to ensure safe and effective use of this drug.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/toxicity , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hydroxychloroquine/toxicity , Mass Screening/standards , Retinal Diseases/diagnosis , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Israel , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Ophthalmologists , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retinal Diseases/chemically induced , Rheumatologists , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Mol Cell Endocrinol ; 286(1-2): 214-8, 2008 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18276067

ABSTRACT

Clinically "non-functioning" human pituitary adenomas (NFPA) constitute about 35% of pituitary adenomas. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) expression in these adenomas has previously been described both in vitro and in vivo, without evidence for a correlation with tumor volume or the therapeutic efficacy of somatostatin analogs. This study was performed on 13 surgically removed pituitary macroadenomas, diagnosed before surgery as "non-functioning". In addition, 3 growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas served as controls. A specimen from each tumor was dispersed and digested to isolate and culture the tumor cells, and the in vitro effects of SSTR2 and SSTR5 selective analogs and Cortistatin (CST) (100nM) on cell viability were studied. The quantity of viable cells was estimated using the XTT method. RNA purification of tumor samples and subsequent RT-PCR studies for SSTR2 and SSTR5 expression were performed. Somatostatin analog with high affinity for SSTR2 reduced cell viability by 20-80% in 8 of 13 NFPAs studied, all expressing the SSTR2. The inhibitory effect on cell viability of SSTR5-selective analog was 15-80% in 10 of 13 NFPAs studied, all but three expressing the SSTR5. CST, however, effectively reduced cell viability in only 6 NFPAs. Cell viability was inhibited by all peptides studied in 2 out of 3 GH-secreting adenomas, expressing both receptors. The third adenoma responded to SSTR2 analog and expressed only SSTR2. These results suggest the involvement of SSTR2 and SSTR5 in the anti-proliferative effects of somatostatin; however, CST is less potent in reducing cell viability in these tumors.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/pharmacology , Pituitary Neoplasms/pathology , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Somatostatin/pharmacology , Adenoma/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cell Survival/drug effects , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Female , Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/metabolism , Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/pathology , Human Growth Hormone/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropeptides/pharmacology , Peptides, Cyclic/pharmacology , Pituitary Neoplasms/metabolism , Tumor Cells, Cultured
3.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 27(8): 1221-6, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11524193

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of peribulbar and sub-Tenon's anesthesia on intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) in the injected eye and the fellow noninjected (control) eye. SETTING: Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. METHODS: This prospective study measured IOP and OPA at baseline and 1 and 10 minutes after administration of lidocaine anesthesia in 40 consecutive adult patients having elective cataract surgery. RESULTS: The IOP remained stable throughout the study with both modes of anesthesia. One minute after injection of the anesthetic agent, the OPA was significantly decreased in the injected eyes in both the sub-Tenon's (24%; P < .05) and peribulbar (25%; P < .05) groups. The decrease in the OPA in the sub-Tenon's group (14%; P < .05) was detectable after 10 minutes in the control eyes. In the peribulbar anesthesia group, the OPA in the control eyes increased significantly (9%; P < .05) 1 minute after injection of the anesthetic agent, returning to preinjection levels 10 minutes after the injection. CONCLUSIONS: The OPA in the eyes in which lidocaine was injected decreased significantly in both the sub-Tenon's and peribulbar groups. These findings have implications for the management of patients whose ocular circulation may be compromised.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Intraocular Pressure/drug effects , Procaine/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Fascia/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Orbit/drug effects , Procaine/analogs & derivatives , Prospective Studies , Regional Blood Flow/drug effects , Retinal Vessels/physiology , Tonometry, Ocular
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...