Prevalence and factors associated with sexual dysfunction in brazilian women: a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Changes in the mechanisms that modulate sexual response can contribute to the development of female sexual dysfunction (FSD). Although the prevalence of FSD in Brazil has been established, its associated risk factors have not been thoroughly examined. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of FSD in Brazilian women and identify any factors that may be associated with its presence. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional design and included women aged 18 years or older who had engaged in sexual activity within the past four weeks. Participants completed the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and a sociodemographic and health questionnaire. Two groups were created based on FSFI scores: those with risk for FSD (score >26.55) and those without. The study used t-tests for independent samples to compare quantitative variables between the groups, and the chi-squared test, to compare categorical variables. Binomial logistic regression was used to test the association between sociodemographic and health variables and FSD. RESULTS: FSD had a prevalence of 31.7% (95% CI: 28.2%-35.5%). The results indicated that practice of physical activity was inversely associated with FSD (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45-0.92), whereas urinary incontinence (OR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.68-3.87) and post-menopause (OR: 4.69, 95% CI: 1.66-13.3) were directly associated with FSD. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of FSD was observed among Brazilian women in this study. Physically active women are less likely to have FSD. Menopause and the presence of urinary incontinence can negatively impact female sexual function.

Supporting Decisions of the Brazilian Regulatory Agency for Supplementary Healthcare: A Case Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report implementation and partial results of the project "Supporting the Brazilian regulatory agency for supplementary healthcare through health technology assessment actions" conducted at Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brazil, from 2020 to 2023, through Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Institucional do Sistema Único de Saúde, a Brazilian Ministry of Health initiative. METHODS: This was a case study conducted at Health Technology Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês. RESULTS: From its inception, in 2020, to July 2022, the following activities and products were completed: 59 technical-methodological reports assessing the efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of technologies received by Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS) to compose its catalog of drugs products and services; 50 analyses of society contributions from public consultation; 34 methodological or clinical tutorial sessions to support ANS team; 2 templates to systematize the update process of ANS catalog; and one training course on systematic reviews and meta-analysis for ANS team. CONCLUSION: The project has contributed to increasing ANS autonomy in the health technology assessment, collaborating to efficiency in technologies offer to the users. By adopting and fostering evidence-based knowledge construction, the project reinforces its bridging role for supporting the consonance between public and supplementary healthcare sectors in Brazil.

Effectiveness of adjunctive treatment combined with exercise therapy for patellofemoral pain: a protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a chronic condition that affects up to 25% of the general population and has a negative impact on functionality and quality of life due to the high levels of pain experienced by these patients. In order to improve pain and function, rehabilitation programmes that combine adjunctive treatments with exercise therapy are often used in research and clinical settings. However, despite the variety of adjunctive treatments available, their effectiveness when compared with exercise therapy has yet to be elucidated. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of adjunctive treatments plus exercise therapy versus exercise therapy, and determine the relative efficacy of different types of adjunctive treatments plus exercise therapy for individuals with PFP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis will be conducted based on the Cochrane Collaboration recommendations and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We will search Embase, PubMed (MEDLINE), CENTRAL, CINAHL, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and OpenGrey. It will be included randomised controlled trials that compared adjunctive treatment plus exercise therapy to placebo adjunctive treatment plus exercise therapy or exercise therapy. The outcomes of interest will be pain and function, with no restrictions on language, setting or year of publication. Study selection will be performed by two independent reviewers, based on the eligibility criteria. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale and the evidence summarised via the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A Bayesian network meta-analysis will be performed to compare the efficacy of different adjunctive treatments plus exercise therapy. Consistency between direct and indirect comparisons will be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical statement will be required for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The findings will be published in a relevant international peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020197081.