Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Scanning ; 33(4): 211-21, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21538394

ABSTRACT

This study examined the surface nanostructures of three orbital implants: nonporous poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), porous aluminum oxide and porous polyethylene. The morphological characteristics of the orbital implants surfaces were observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The AFM topography, phase shift and deflection images of the intact implant samples were obtained. The surface of the nonporous PMMA implant showed severe scratches and debris. The surface of the aluminum oxide implant showed a porous structure with varying densities and sizes. The PMMA implant showed nodule nanostructures, 215.56 ± 52.34 nm in size, and the aluminum oxide implant showed crystal structures, 730.22 ± 341.02 nm in size. The nonporous PMMA implant showed the lowest roughness compared with other implant biomaterials, followed by the porous aluminum oxide implant. The porous polyethylene implant showed the highest roughness and severe surface irregularities. Overall, the surface roughness of orbital implants might be associated with the rate of complications and cell adhesion.


Subject(s)
Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Microscopy, Atomic Force/methods , Nanostructures/ultrastructure , Orbital Implants , Polyethylenes/chemistry , Polymethyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Pilot Projects , Porosity , Surface Properties
2.
Angle Orthod ; 80(2): 385-90, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19905867

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and periodontal side effects of laser circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy (CSF) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on orthodontically rotated teeth in beagles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen mandibular incisors from nine dogs were divided into three groups by treatment (n = 6/group): A, orthodontic couple force application only (control); B, laser CSF following orthodontic couple force application; and C, LLLT following orthodontic couple force application. Both mandibular lateral incisors were rotated for 4 weeks, and the relapse tendency was observed for 4 weeks more without any retainers. The amount of relapse, sulcus depth, and gingival recession were measured at weeks 4 and 8. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Scheffé's post hoc test were used for data analysis. Tissue specimens were examined at week 8 under light microscopy after hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and Masson's trichrome staining. RESULTS: The mean percentage of relapse was 41.29% in group A, 14.52% in group B, and 56.80% in group C (P < .001). Four weeks after laser CSF, the sulcus depth increased by 0.67 mm, but no gingival recession was observed. There was no significant difference between groups A and C in terms of sulcus depth and gingival recession. CONCLUSIONS: Laser CSF is an effective procedure to decrease relapse after tooth rotation, causing no apparent damage to the supporting periodontal structures, whereas LLLT on orthodontically rotated teeth without retainers appears to increase the relapse tendency.


Subject(s)
Gingivectomy/methods , Laser Therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Dental Stress Analysis , Dogs , Gingival Recession/etiology , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Male , Rotation , Secondary Prevention , Statistics, Nonparametric
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...