Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and relapse in patients with clinical stage IS testicular cancer.

PURPOSE: Clinical stage I (CSI) testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) represents disease confined to the testis without metastasis and CSIS is defined as persistently elevated tumor markers (TM) after orchiectomy, indicating subclinical metastatic disease. This study aims at assessing clinical characteristics and oncological outcome in CSIS. METHODS: Data from five tertiary referring centers in Germany were screened. We defined correct classification of CSIS according to EAU guidelines. TM levels, treatment and relapse-free survival were assessed and differences between predefined groups (chemotherapy, correct/incorrect CSIS) were analyzed with Fisher's exact and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Out of 2616 TGCT patients, 43 (1.6%) were CSIS. Thereof, 27 were correctly classified (cCSIS, 1.03%) and 16 incorrectly classified (iCSIS). TMs that defined cCSIS were in 12 (44.4%), 10 (37%), 3 (11.1%) and 2 (7.4%) patients AFP, ß-HCG, AFP plus ß-HCG and LDH, respectively. In the cCSIS group, six patients were seminoma and 21 non-seminoma. Treatment consisted of active surveillance, carboplatin-mono AUC7 and BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin). No difference between cCSIS and iCSIS with respect to applied chemotherapy was found (p = 0.830). 5-year relapse-free survival was 88.9% and three patients (11%) in the cCSIS group relapsed. All underwent salvage treatment (3xBEP) with no documented death. CONCLUSION: Around 1% of all TGCT were classified as cCSIS patients. Identification of cCSIS is of critical importance to avoid disease progression and relapses by adequate treatment. We report a high heterogeneity of treatment patterns, associated with excellent long-term survival irrespective of the initial treatment approach.

[COVID-19 in urology : Influence of the pandemic on telemedicine, education and surgery]. / COVID-19 im urologischen Alltag : Einfluss der Pandemie auf Telemedizin, Ausbildung und Operationen in der Urologie.

The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic has caused a worldwide economic and clinical disaster. During times with the highest infection rates, clinical practice for all specialties including urology shifted to the emergency setting. Proper patient selection needs to be done to avoid infection; however, there is a fine line between postponing surgery and negatively affecting the outcome of the disease to be treated. The rapid integration of telemedicine has helped to keep up outpatient medical care, interdisciplinary communication and education. Nevertheless, surgical education of urological residents initially fell behind. The real impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on urology will probably first be seen after the awaited vaccine and control of COVID-19.

[Perception of the COVID-19 Pandemic among Pneumology Professionals in Germany]. / Wahrnehmung der COVID-19-Pandemie unter pneumologischen Fachkräften in Deutschland.

The COVID-19 pandemic represents a huge burden on global health systems. Although far-reaching prevention measures such as the increase of intensive care capacities and drastic restrictions of public life have so far been able to avert an overload of the German health care system, the current situation implies an exceptionally high burden on medical professionals. The current study presents the results of an opinion evaluation among 513 pneumology specialists in Germany in the period from March 27th to April 11th, 2020. While the majority of respondents stated that Germany was "well" prepared for the pandemic, this assessment was significantly worse among participants from the outpatient sector compared to the hospital sector (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a lack of medical protective equipment was reported significantly more frequently by respondents from the outpatient sector (p < 0.001). The importance of telemedicine approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic was rated "high" (35.2 %) or "very high" (17.2 %) by most pneumology professionals, with participants from the hospital sector giving a higher rating (p < 0.001). Finally, 45.8 % of the respondents expressed a "negative" influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on their personal mood and 58.3 % expressed "strong" or "very strong" concerns about the health of their fellow human beings. This assessment was significantly stronger among female participants and participants from the nursing sector (p < 0.001). In summary, the current study analyses for the first time the professional and personal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pneumology professionals in Germany. The results could help to identify first starting points to better support health professionals during the current and future challenges.

[Interdisciplinary education in urology: innovations for better training]. / Verbundweiterbildung in der Urologie: Innovationen für eine bessere Ausbildung.

The current version of the urology training program will concentrate on the mediation of competences and skills in various fields of action for outpatient urology instead of persisting on the minimum and reference numbers of surgical and diagnostic procedures. However, the following fields of action must be fulfilled: microbiology, andrology and systemic cancer therapy. There is justifiable concern that various institutions will lose their permission for a complete 5­year residency program based on the above-mentioned demands since not all institutions have all subspecialties in urology. Those institutions need to define new ways of residency training such as interdisciplinary programs within their own institution between disciplines like pediatric surgery, gynecology and medical oncology. Other options are combined training programs between regional urology departments with different main focuses or training programs between institutions and urologists in private practice. There is an unmet need to improve residency training as well as board examinations by new structures and a reliable curriculum. Based on the changed main focuses of the new version of urology training, we need to discuss the future of residency programs. It might be helpful to discuss two different types of urology training with a common trunk for the first three years followed by a more outpatient-based residency training for the general urologist and a more specialized training for the inpatient urologist to be educated in complex treatment modalities. An open mind to broadening our own horizon, respectful discussion with other departments and the development of common, reliable and interdisciplinary contents represent indispensable prerequisites to realize such an innovative future training program.

[When is surgical resection of metastases in testicular germ cell tumors indicated and is there a scientific basis?] / Wann ist die operative Versorgung von Metastasen beim testikulären Keimzelltumor angezeigt und gibt es eine wissenschaftliche Grundlage dafür?

Surgical resection of metastases represents an integral part of curative management in patients with testicular germ cell tumors (GCT). Primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) for low volume metastases in clinical stages I-IIB has to be differentiated from the more complex and more extensive postchemotherapeutic procedures. In Europe, primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) for clinical stage I nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT) plays a subordinate. In clinical stage IIA/B, nsRPLND is indicated for patients with marker-negative metastases in whom cure rates of about 65% can be achieved with surgery alone. For clinical stage IIA/B seminomas, nsRPLND represents an individual, still experimental procedure with high cure rates. Postchemotherapy residual tumor resection (pRTR) for advanced seminomas is only indicated in the context of a FDG-PET/CT-positive residual mass >3 cm in diameter. For NSGCT, pRTR is indicated in patients with residual masses >1 cm and negative or plateauing tumor markers to resect persisting teratoma or vital cancer. Complete resection of all masses including resection of adjacent vascular, visceral or skeletal metastases is mandatory to achieving the highest cure rate possible. Due to the complexity and the lower rate of significant morbidity and mortality, these procedures should be done at tertiary referral centers.

Surgical management of complex residual masses following systemic chemotherapy for metastatic testicular germ cell tumours.

Background: Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (PC-RPLND) represents the treatment of choice in patients with residual masses following chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell tumours. Involvement of major retroperitoneal vessels or thoracic/lumbar spine is rare and challenging but needs complete resection for curative intent. We report on our experience in the management of such complex cases. Patients and methods: A total of 185 patients underwent PC-RPLND and we identified 25 (13.5%) patients who needed complex adjunctive vascular (n = 16, 8.6%), skeletal (n = 5, 2.7%) and pancreaticoduodenal (n = 4, 2.2%) surgeries. We performed a retrospective analysis of treatment-associated complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Progression-free, cancer-specific and overall survival was calculated. Results: All patients were of intermediate/poor prognosis according to IGCCCG. Median tumour diameter at time of surgery was 18.6 (9.0-35) cm. Sixteen (8.6%) underwent vascular surgery including aortic resection and replacement, complete or partial resection of the inferior vena cava with thrombectomy, and resection and replacement of the iliac vessels. In five patients, 1-2 metastatic lumbar vertebral bodies were resected, stabilized and replaced. Four patients underwent en-bloc resection of a suprahilar mass with pancreas and duodenum. Pathohistology revealed vital cancer in five patients; teratoma and malignant somatic transformation was identified in 12 and 6 patients, respectively. Complications occurred more often in the group of complex RPLND (41.7 versus 7.2%, P = 0.02) with the majority representing grade I-IIa. After a median follow-up of 28.5 months, four patients developed recurrent disease and one patient died of the disease. Conclusions: Few patients with advanced GCT need complex vascular, skeletal or intestinal surgery in an interdisciplinary setting with good functional and oncological outcome. Due to the complexity, treatment should be performed at specialized centres.

[Postchemotherapy residual tumour resection in complex metastatic sites of advanced testicular germ cell tumours]. / Postchemotherapeutische Residualtumorresektion komplexer Metastasenlokalisationen fortgeschrittener testikulärer Keimzelltumoren.

INTRODUCTION: Postchemotherapy residual tumour resection (PC-RTR) is an integral part of the multimodal therapy for advanced testicular germ cell tumours. Depending on the extent and localisation of the residual mass, PC-RTR may necessitate a multidisciplinary procedure (which should be planned preoperatively), to resolve even complex situations in an oncologically sound manner, with lower treatment-related morbidity The aim of article is to report on the interdisciplinary management of complex residual masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of a total of 162 patients who underwent PC-RTR, 24 (17.8 %) patients underwent, in addition to a bilateral postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (PC-RPLND), complex adjunctive resections including the abdominal aorta, the inferior vena cava, or the thoracic/lumbar spine, and the neighbouring vessels (n = 15). We performed a retrospective analysis of treatment-associated complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and of progression-free, cancer-specific and overall survival. RESULTS: Median patient age was 24.5 (18-52) years. All patients had an intermediate or poor prognosis according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaboration Group (IGCCCG). Median tumour diameter at the time of surgery was 18.6 (9.0-35) cm. In 5 patients 1-2 metastatic lumbar vertebral bodies were completely resected, stabilised and replaced by means of a cage. In 6 patients resection of the abdominal aorta/inferior vena cava with vascular prosthesis replacement was required owing to infiltration. In 2 patients the common iliac artery or vein was resected and replaced. In addition, retrocrural lymph nodes had to be resected in 5 patients and 3 patients required adjunctive nephrectomy. In another 4 patients the Whipple procedure was required owing to infiltration into the pancreas and/or duodenum. The median operating time was 7.8 (6-15) h, the median blood loss was around 1,450 (900-3,400) ml, and 2 Clavien-Dindo grade IVa complications occurred. Pathohistology revealed teratoma/vital cancer in 16/24 patients and scarring/necrosis in 8 patients. After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 1 patient developed recurrent disease and 1 patient died of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Postchemotherapy, a few patients with advanced nonseminomas (NS) need complex residual tumour resection in an interdisciplinary setting, with a good functional and oncological outcome. Even the involvement of vascular vertebral structures does not constitute a contraindication for complete resection.