[Continuous lateral rotational bed therapy in patients with traumatic lung injury: an analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®]. / Die kontinuierliche laterale Rotationstherapie bei Patienten mit Thoraxtrauma: eine Analyse aus dem TraumaRegister DGU®.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe thoracic trauma often receive continuous lateral rotational bed therapy (CLRT) for the treatment of lung contusions. In this study, the effects of CLRT on mortality, morbidity and length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital were evaluated. METHODS: Retrospective data from the TraumaRegister DGU® were analysed, focusing on patients with severe thoracic trauma. Patients treated with CLRT were compared to a control group with comparable trauma severity who had received conventional therapy. RESULTS: A total of 1476 patients (239 with CLRT, 1237 without CLRT) were included in this study. Both groups were similar for demographic characteristics. The median CLRT duration was 6 (4-10) days. Patients receiving CLRT were ventilated for 17 (10-26) days compared to 14 (8-22) days (p = 0.001) in the control group. The ICU length of stay differed significantly (CLRT: 23 [14-32] days; control: 19 [13-28] days; p = 0.002). Also, organ failure occurred more frequently in patients treated with CLRT (CLRT: 76.6%, control: 67.6%; p = 0.006). No differences could be detected regarding mortality rates, multiple organ failure and hospital LOS. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this retrospective analysis fail to detect a benefit for CLRT therapy in trauma patients. Considering inherent limitations of retrospective studies, caution should be exerted when interpreting these results. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings in a prospective trial.

[ATLS® and TDSC®: how it fits together : A treatment concept for mass casualty and terrorist-related mass casualty situations, life-threatening and special scenarios]. / ATLS® und TDSC®: How it fits together : Ein Behandlungskonzept für MANV und TerrorMANV, lebensbedrohliche oder besondere Lagen.

Terrorist-related mass casualty incidents represent a medical and organizational challenge for all hospitals. The main reasons are the special patterns of injuries, the onset and development of the scenario, the lack of information at the beginning, the overall number of casualties and the number of uninjured but involved patients presenting at the hospital.Due to these circumstances and the high percentage of penetrating injuries with a permanent risk of uncontrollable bleeding and other life-threatening complications, a strategic and tactical initial surgical care is necessary.For these special terrorist-related mass casualty (MasCal) situations, the Terror and Disaster Surgical Care (TDSC®) course was developed and imparts special medical and surgical knowledge as well as a scenario-based training in surgical decision-making. The TDSC® course focusses on the scenario-related provision of surgical care and distribution of the limited resources to enable survival for as many patients as possible.To improve individualized trauma care course formats, such as the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®) were established and are nowadays widespread in Germany. It could be shown that standardized approaches and algorithm-based treatment could improve the outcome of trauma victims. Faced with the present day permanent risk of a possible terrorist-related MasCal situation, the question arises how and to what extent elements and principles of both course formats (TDSC® and ATLS®) could be used to improve and organize the initial care in a terrorist-linked MasCal incident.For the first time it is shown that the key elements of both courses (primary survey of the ATLS® and the TDSC® principles: categorization, prioritization, disposition and realization) could be established and integratively used to structure the initial intrahospital medical and surgical care.

[Future perspective of the TraumaRegister DGU® : Further development, additional modules and potential limits]. / Zukunftsperspektiven des TraumaRegister DGU® : Weiterentwicklung, Zusatzmodule und potenzielle Grenzen.

Since its founding in 1993 the TraumaRegister DGU® has become one of the largest registries especially in terms of data diversity. Since the introduction of the TraumaNetzwerk DGU®, the TraumaRegister DGU® has enabled a quasi-nationwide picture of the quality of care of severely injured patients in Germany. The register is subject to constant development, under the guidance of the working groups of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU). The first modular expansion of special injury entities (craniocerebral trauma and complex hand injuries) is currently taking place. The future developments will involve the extension of the register to certain injury patterns. The existing registry will also be supplemented with other recorded qualities (from the supplementary serum database up to the quality of life). This makes the TraumaRegister DGU® a tool for quality assurance and science which is well prepared for the future.

[Optimization of criteria for activation of trauma teams : Avoidance of overtriage and undertriage]. / Optimierung der Kriterien zur Schockraumalarmierung : Vermeidung von Über- und Untertriage.

INTRODUCTION: Severely injured patients are supposed to be admitted to hospital via the trauma room. Appropriate criteria are contained in the S3 guidelines on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries (S3-GL); however, some of these criteria require scarce hospital resources while the patients then often clinically present as uninjured. There are tendencies to streamline the trauma team activation criteria (TTAC); however, additional undertriage must be avoided. A study group of the emergency, intensive care medicine and treatment of the severely injured section (NIS) is in the process of optimizing the TTAC for the German trauma system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In order to solve the objective the following multi-step approach is necessary: a) definition of patients who potentially benefit from TTA, b) verification of the definition in the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU), c) carrying out a prospective, multicenter study in order to determine overtriage and undertriage, thereby validating the activation criteria and d) revision of the current TTAC. RESULTS: This article summarizes the consensus criteria of the group assumed to be capable of identifying patients who potentially benefit from TTA. These criteria are used to test if TTA was justified in a specific case; however, as the TTCA of the S3-GL are not fully incorporated into the TR-DGU dataset and because cases must also be considered which were not subject to trauma room treatment and therefore were not included in the TR-DGU, it is necessary to perform a prospective full survey of all individuals in order to be able to measure overtriage and undertriage. CONCLUSION: Currently, the TR-DGU can only provide limited evidence on the quality of the TTAC recommended in Germany. This problem has been recognized and will be solved by conducting a prospective DGU-supported study, the results of which can be used to improve the TR-DGU dataset in order to enable further considerations on the quality of care (e. g. composition and size of the trauma team).

[The TraumaRegister DGU® dataset, its development over 25 years and advances in the care of severely injured patients]. / Der Datensatz des TraumaRegister DGU®, seine Entwicklung über 25 Jahre und Fortschritte in der Schwerverletzenversorgung.

BACKGROUND: Since the publication in 1993, the dataset and documentation form of the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) have continuously evolved. On the occasion of the 25th anniversary the authors have analyzed this evolution in order to reflect it in the light of medical progress in the treatment of the severely injured. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Enrolled in the study were 5 reference data entry sheets from the years 1993, 1996, 2002, 2009 and 2016. Every piece of information (item) queried therein was entered into the study database, was categorized by topic and counted for further analysis. RESULTS: The arrangement of the 4­page data entry form has remained practically unchanged since 1993 and includes an average of 212 items. A total of 491 items were identified of which 64 were present throughout every dataset. Based on the average extent of the form this equals a proportion of approximately 30%. The dataset actually shows much more consistency than this number suggests because many changes can be traced back to a smarter design of the data entry form. Most items fell into the categories "results/diagnosis" (143 items/29.1%), "coagulation" (104/21.2%) and "surgical approach" (40/8.1%). Many items serve as raw data for the calculation of prognostic risk scores, such as the trauma and injury severity score (TRISS), the revised injury severity classification II (RISC II) and the trauma associated severe hemorrhage (TASH) score. Currently, nine scores can be calculated from the dataset. CONCLUSION: The members of the working group TraumaRegister all actively participate in the treatment of severely injured patients. For 25 years this group has managed to unify the latest medical developments and well-established parameters within the TR-DGU dataset at a relatively constant degree of effort for documentation. Practice in place of theory is the driving force behind this development that serves quality assurance and research in the treatment of severely injured patients.

A Consensus-Based Criterion Standard for the Requirement of a Trauma Team.

BACKGROUND: Trauma team activation (TTA) represents a considerable expenditure of trauma centre resources. It is mainly triggered by field triage criteria. The overall quality of the criteria may be evaluated based on the rate of over- and undertriage. However, there is no gold standard that defines which adult patients truly require a trauma team. The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based criteria defining the necessity for a trauma team. METHODS: A consensus group was formed by trauma specialists experienced in emergency and trauma care with a specific interest in field triage and having previously participated in guideline development. A literature search was conducted to identify criteria that have already been used or suggested. The initial list of criteria was discussed in two Delphi round and two consensus conferences. The entire process of discussion and voting was highly standardized and extensively documented, resulting in a final list of criteria. RESULTS: Initially 95 criteria were identified. This was subsequently reduced to 20 final criteria to appropriately indicate the requirement for attendance of a trauma team. The criteria address aspects related to injury severity, admission to an intensive care unit, death within 24 h, need for specified invasive procedures, need for surgical and/or interventional radiological procedures, and abnormal vital signs within a defined time period. CONCLUSIONS: The selected criteria may be applied as a tool for research and quality control concerning TTA. However, future studies are necessary to further evaluate for possible redundancy in criteria that may allow for further reduction in criteria.

[Recommendations for Releasing the Pelvic Binder After a Non-Invasive Pelvic Stabilisation Procedure Under Emergency Room Conditions]. / "Clear-the-Pelvis-Algorithmus": Handlungsempfehlung zur Freigabe des Beckens nach nicht invasiver Stabilisierung mittels Beckengurt im Rahmen der Schockraumversorgung.

Severe brain, thoracic and intrapelvic injuries, as well as heavy bleeding, are the main causes of death in patients with major trauma. Unstable pelvic ring fractures can cause this bleeding and the so-called "C problem". This is usually due to haemorrhagic shock caused by the loss of large volumes of blood from the presacral venous plexus, iliac vessels and the fracture surfaces. Many clinical studies have shown that, in the preclinical setting, unstable pelvic ring injuries are often underestimated. The application of a non-invasive external pelvic ring stabilisation (pelvic binder) is therefore recommended if a pelvic fracture is possible. Several circumferential pelvic binders have been developed and their prehospital use is increasing. Clinical and biomechanical studies have demonstrated that there is a favourable haemodynamic effect in unstable fractures, due to rapid closure of the pelvic ring. It is unclear whether the pelvic binder can be safely removed in a presumably haemodynamically stable patient. A correctly placed pelvic binder leads to anatomical closure of the pelvic ring. Therefore unstable pelvic ring fractures may be clinically and radiologically overlooked. This is a particular problem in unconscious patients. Furthermore, the real severity of the injury may then be underestimated in the diagnostic evaluation. Unconsidered opening of the pelvic binder can thus provoke renewed deterioration of the circulatory situation, especially if the injury was adequately treated by the binder and the C problem was controlled. The aim of this article is to describe procedures for handling pelvic binders, particularly as to how to deal with an already applied pelvic binder and how to "clear the pelvic region" while reducing the risk of haemodynamic instability. A detailed analysis of the literature and a Delphi-like discussion among several experts were performed. The following points were raised: 1) Assessment of the clinical situation, including trauma kinematics. 2) Assessment of the haemodynamic status. 3) Check of the need to open the pelvic binder for diagnostic/therapeutic measures before completing all diagnostic tests. 4) Assessment of the radiology diagnostic testing and release of the pelvic region. The result is a so-called "clear the pelvis algorithm" which describes a structured approach according to specific criteria and which specifies the circumstances under which the pelvic binder can be opened. Additional studies are necessary to analyse the applicability and safety of this algorithm in a clinical context. Our advice is not to "clear" the pelvis if no X-rays or CT scans of the pelvis have been carried out without (or with an opened) pelvic binder.

[Treatment of severely injured patients : Impact of the German Trauma Registry DGU®]. / Versorgung Schwerverletzter in Deutschland : Einfluss des TraumaRegister DGU®.

The German Trauma Registry DGU® started in 1993 as an initiative of five dedicated trauma centers and has evolved significantly since then. Data were obtained at four points of time from the site of the accident until discharge from hospital. In the first year (1993), the registry collected data of 260 patients from 5 hospitals. In 2015 more than 38.000 were included from 640 hospitals.This paper focusses on the impact of the trauma registry on the treatment of severely injured patients. Several authors could show that the data can be used by hospitals for benchmarking. This can help to detect problems in individual hospitals and to find solutions that can be implemented into the process of care and its subsequent reevaluation. Due to structural and process-related changes, the time necessary for the management in the emergency room could be reduced significantly. Various scientific analyses of the Trauma Registry DGU® data were implemented in the treatment of severely injured patients. In the prehospital treatment, this changed the criteria for intubation and led to a reduction of volume replacement. In the hospital setting, the analysis influenced the radiologic work-up and the treatment of coagulopathy of severely injured patients. Moreover, the risk-adjusted mortality of severely injured patients in Germany could be continuously reduced over the past 20 years.

[Current standard of care for initial management of open fractures in emergency departments : A nationwide survey in German trauma centers]. / Realität initialer Versorgung offener Frakturen in deutschen Notaufnahmen : Eine Umfrage aus der Sektion NIS der DGU.

BACKGROUND: Limiting the morbidity of open fractures requires highly specific initial treatment. In addition to a stringent surgical strategy, correct antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be associated with an improved outcome. In the current literature, the duration and type of antibiotic prophylaxis are under discussion. The aim of the study was to survey the current initial treatment regimes for open fractures in German emergency departments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: With an online-based anonymous 16-item questionnaire all 3006 members of the German Trauma Society were surveyed. A total of 585 questionnaires (19.5 %) were returned completed. This article presents a descriptive analysis of the current state of treatment. RESULTS: Mainly specialists (35 %), senior physicians (30 %) and chief physicians (17 %) answered as well as interns (8 %) and out-patient practitioners (10 %). Of the participants 65 % did not accept the classification of emergency services; however, 93 % carried out urgent or emergency surgery, 84 % started an antibiotic prophylaxis in the emergency department and 63 % used a standard operating procedure (SOP). A total of 60 % used 1 antibiotic drug, 25 % used 2 and 15 % used 3 or more substances. An antibiotic treatment for more than 3 days was performed by 60 % of participants. CONCLUSION: The early initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be the standard practice in German emergency departments as well as early surgery. Strategies to improve the communication between prehospital and in-hospital teams, as well as graded antibiotic prophylaxis depending on the severity of soft tissue damage are needed.

Patterns of early resuscitation associated with mortality after penetrating injuries.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating injuries are rare in European populations so their management represents a particular challenge. The aim was to assess early therapeutic aspects that are associated with favourable outcomes in patients with penetrating trauma. METHODS: Patients with penetrating injuries documented from 2009 to 2013 in the TraumaRegister DGU® were analysed. Patients with a primary admission and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of at least 9 were included. The Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC) II score was used for mortality prediction, and a standardized mortality ratio (SMR) calculated per hospital. Hospitals with favourable outcome (SMR below 1) were compared with those with poor outcome (SMR 1 or more). RESULTS: A total of 50 centres had favourable outcome (1242 patients; observed mortality rate 15.7 per cent) and 34 centres had poor outcome (918 patients; observed mortality rate 24.4 per cent). Predicted mortality rates according to RISC-II were 20.4 and 20.5 per cent respectively. Mean(s.d.) ISS values were 22(14) versus 21(14) (P = 0.121). Patients in the favourable outcome group had a significantly shorter time before admission to hospital and a lower intubation rate. They received smaller quantities of intravenous fluids on admission to the emergency room, but larger amounts of fresh frozen plasma, and were more likely to receive haemostatic agents. A higher proportion of patients in the favourable outcome group were treated in a level I trauma centre. Independent risk factors for hospital death following penetrating trauma identified by multivariable analysis included gunshot injury mechanism and treatment in non-level I centres. CONCLUSION: Among penetrating traumas, gunshot injuries pose an independent risk of death. Treatment of penetrating trauma in a level I trauma centre was significantly and independently associated with lower hospital mortality.

[Essential measures for prehospital treatment of severely injured patients: The trauma care bundle]. / Wesentliche Maßnahmen zur prähospitalen Versorgung schwerverletzter Patienten: Das Trauma Care Bundle.

BACKGROUND: In order to ensure adequate treatment and to avoid complications, care bundles are increasingly being implemented. These are comprehensive and evidence-based procedures for the treatment of individual diseases or injuries which should be carried out for every patient. The aim of this study was to define a care bundle for the prehospital treatment of severely injured patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The scientific contents of the bundle were gathered from the interdisciplinary evidence-based S3 guidelines for the treatment of severely injured patients by the German Trauma Society. The ABCDE scheme suggested by the prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS®) and the advanced trauma life support (ATLS®) functioned as a matrix for the individual elements in the bundles. The identified elements were finalized by a consensus process. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A bundle of six elements was suggested and a comprehensive summary of key items during prehospital management of severely injured patients was identified. In a next step the effectiveness of the care bundle should be evaluated in a clinical trial.

Trauma registry comparison: six-year results in trauma care in Southern Finland and Germany.

PURPOSE: To compare the treatment and survival of trauma patients in Germany and Southern Finland. METHODS: Data from Helsinki University Hospital trauma registry (TR-THEL) and TraumaRegister DGU(®) (TR-DGU) were compared in a period from 2006 until 2011. From TR-DGU level-one trauma centers treating annually >50 injury severity score (ISS) >15 patients were included. The inclusion criterion was ISS >15. Patients under 16 years with penetrating trauma without head injury and transferred in with isolated head injury were excluded. The compared parameters were age, sex, pre-injury ASA, injury scoring, injury pattern, mechanism of injury, injury distribution, pre-hospital timings, transportation method, pre-hospital intubation, treatment at hospital, discharge destination, and 30-day hospital mortality. Expected mortality was defined with the Revised Injury Severity Classification score (RISC). RESULTS: Eighty-five German level-one trauma centers were included. A total of 15,306 and 1,274 patients were included in the outcome analysis from TR-DGU and TR-THEL, respectively. The difference between the observed and expected mortality of all patients was -4.1% (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] 0.82) at German hospitals and -4.0% (SMR 0.79) in Helsinki. Differences in the pre- and in-hospital treatment between the two countries were noted (transportation method, intubation rate, intensive care unit treatment, ventilation time, length of stay). CONCLUSION: The overall outcome results of the Helsinki University Hospital trauma unit were similar to those of the German level-one trauma centers. Registry comparison is a feasible method of quality control in a trauma centre.

[Complex pelvic traumas : data linkage of the German Pelvic Injury Register and the TraumaRegister DGU®]. / Das komplexe Beckentrauma : Matching des Beckenregisters DGU mit dem TraumaRegister DGU®.

BACKGROUND: Complex pelvic traumas, i.e., pelvic fractures accompanied by pelvic soft tissue injuries, still have an unacceptably high mortality rate of about 18 %. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated an intersection set of data from the TraumaRegister DGU® and the German Pelvic Injury Register from 2004-2009. Patients with complex and noncomplex pelvic traumas were compared regarding their vital parameters, emergency management, stay in the ICU, and outcome. RESULTS: From a total of 344 patients with pelvic injuries, 21 % of patients had a complex and 79 % a noncomplex trauma. Complex traumas were significantly less likely to survive (16.7 % vs. 5.9 %). Whereas vital parameters and emergency treatment in the preclinical setting did not differ substantially, patients with complex traumas were more often in shock and showed acute traumatic coagulopathy on hospital arrival, which resulted in more fluid volumes and transfusions when compared to patients with noncomplex traumas. Furthermore, patients with complex traumas had more complications and longer ICU stays. CONCLUSION: Prevention of exsanguination and complications like multiple organ dysfunction syndrome still pose a major challenge in the management of complex pelvic traumas.

[Current practice in coagulation and transfusion therapy in multiple trauma patients: A German nation-wide online survey]. / Stand der Gerinnungs- und Transfusionstherapie beim Schwerverletzten : Eine deutschlandweite Online-Umfrage.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the treatment of trauma-associated coagulopathy and bleeding has advanced enormously. The aim of this study was to assess the current practice of coagulation and transfusion management in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2011 until January 2012 we conducted a survey via online-questionnaire that was sent per E-Mail to all members of the German Society for Trauma Surgery. It comprised 12 questions with respect to current treatment of coagulopathy and haemorrhage in trauma patients. RESULTS: The response rate was 145/3006 (5 %). The respondents had following specialties: 77.2 % trauma surgery 15.9 % anesthesiology, 6.9 % others. 64 % of respondents were employed by a Level 1 trauma centre, wheras 17 % worked in a local level 3 centre. The majority (94 %) claimed to treat hypothermia regularly. Only about half of the participants reported to follow a massive transfusion protocol in their institution. The potential components of these protocols were reported in varying rates, being it well-established components (e.g. FFP 78 %; Fibrinogen 75 %) or therapies with poor evidence in multiple trauma (Desmopressin 39 %, rFVIIa 47 %). Calcium was provided by only 48 % of respondents although generally recommended in all guidelines. CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that in Germany strategies and principles regarding management of trauma-associated coagulopathy are standardized only poorly. Level 1 centres appear to apply a more advanced approach, however to much variability exists with respect to the components of the transfusion protocols. The low response rate indicates that most German trauma surgeons consider coagulation and hemorrhage as "expert-topics" beyond their field of duty.

[Gunshot and stab wounds in Germany--epidemiology and outcome: analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®]. / Schuss- und Stichverletzungen in Deutschland--Epidemiologie und Outcome : Eine Analyse aus dem TraumaRegister DGU®

BACKGROUND: The management of gunshot wounds is a rare challenge for trauma surgeons in Germany and Central Europe as a result of the low incidence of this type of trauma. Penetrating injuries occur with an incidence of 5% in Germany. They are caused by gunshots or more commonly by knives or other objects, for example during accidents. Since even the number of patients who are treated at level 1 trauma centres is limited by the low incidence, the objective of this study was to assess the epidemiology and outcome of gunshot and stab wounds in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 2009, the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (TraumaRegister DGU®) has been used to assess not only whether a trauma was penetrating but also whether it was caused by a gunshot or a stabbing. On the basis of this registry, we identified relevant cases and defined the observation period. Data were taken from the standard documentation forms that participating German hospitals completed between 2009 and 2011. We did not specify exclusion criteria in order to obtain as comprehensive a picture as possible of the trauma entities investigated in this study. As a result of the high incidence of gunshot wounds to the head and the implications of this type of injury for the entire group, a subgroup of patients without head injuries was analysed. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2011, there were 305 patients with gunshot wounds and 871 patients with stab wounds. The high proportion of suicide-related gunshot wounds to the head resulted in a cumulative mortality rate of 39.7%. Stab wounds were associated with a lower mortality rate (6.2%). Every fourth patient with a gunshot or stab wound presented with haemorrhagic shock, which was considerably more frequently seen during the prehospital phase than during the inhospital phase of patient management. Of the patients with gunshot wounds, 26.9% required transfusions. This percentage was three times higher than that for patients with blunt trauma. CONCLUSION: In Germany, gunshot and stab wounds have a low incidence and are mostly caused by violent crime or attempted suicide. Depending on the site of injury, they have a high mortality and are often associated with major haemorrhage. As a result of the low incidence of these types of trauma, further data and analyses are required which can provide the basis for an evaluation of the long-term quality of the management of patients with stab or gunshot wounds.

The ATLS(®) classification of hypovolaemic shock: a well established teaching tool on the edge?

Uncontrolled bleeding is the leading cause of shock in trauma patients and delays in recognition and treatment have been linked to adverse outcomes. For prompt detection and management of hypovolaemic shock, ATLS(®) suggests four shock classes based upon vital signs and an estimated blood loss in percent. Although this classification has been widely implemented over the past decades, there is still no clear prospective evidence to fully support this classification. In contrast, it has recently been shown that this classification may be associated with substantial deficits. A retrospective analysis of data derived from the TraumaRegister DGU(®) indicated that only 9.3% of all trauma patients could be allocated into one of the ATLS(®) shock classes when a combination of the three vital signs heart rate, systolic blood pressure and Glasgow Coma Scale was assessed. Consequently, more than 90% of all trauma patients could not be classified according to the ATLS(®) classification of hypovolaemic shock. Further analyses including also data from the UK-based TARN registry suggested that ATLS(®) may overestimate the degree of tachycardia associated with hypotension and underestimate mental disability in the presence of hypovolaemic shock. This finding was independent from pre-hospital treatment as well as from the presence or absence of a severe traumatic brain injury. Interestingly, even the underlying trauma mechanism (blunt or penetrating) had no influence on the number of patients who could be allocated adequately. Considering these potential deficits associated with the ATLS(®) classification of hypovolaemic shock, an online survey among 383 European ATLS(®) course instructors and directors was performed to assess the actual appreciation and confidence in this tool during daily clinical trauma care. Interestingly, less than half (48%) of all respondents declared that they would assess a potential circulatory depletion within the primary survey according to the ATLS(®) classification of hypovolaemic shock. Based on these observations, a critical reappraisal of the current ATLS(®) classification of hypovolaemic seems warranted.

[The TraumaRegister DGU® as data source for monitoring severe injuries]. / Das TraumaRegister DGU® als Datenquelle für das Monitoring schwerer Unfallverletzungen.

BACKGROUND: The TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (TR-DGU) has collected data on the treatment of severely injured accident victims in Germany since 1993. Due to the current number of more than 600 participating clinics which regularly receive quality comparison reports, these register data are becoming an increasingly more valuable source for healthcare research. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this article are to describe the potential of the TR-DGU for dealing with epidemiological questions and for describing the quality of the process and results for treatment of severely injured patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The TR-DGU includes approximately 100 details per patient on the person, the circumstances of the accident, the injury pattern, the preclinical and hospital treatment, the condition of the patient and the outcome. Using comparative analyses the observed mortality is adjusted by considering prognostically relevant findings. Some key features of the register are reported for patients who were treated in German hospitals between 2002 and 2012 with an injury severity score (ISS) of ≥9 points. RESULTS: Since 1993 more than 122,000 patients have been included in the register. The majority are traffic accident victims (57 %), followed by patients with falls from low heights (< 3 m, 17 %) or greater heights (> 3 m, 16 %). Among the traffic accident victims approximately one half are car drivers or passengers (46 %), one quarter are motorbike drivers (25 %) and the rest are cyclists (14 %) and pedestrians (13 %). The mortality of patients with an ISS ³ 9 is 12.8 %. This value is approximately 1-2 % below the expected prognosis based on data from the 1990s. DISCUSSION: The TR-DGU is not only a successful instrument for external quality assurance of the treatment of severely injured patients but also an increasingly more valuable source for scientific evaluation within the framework of healthcare research. The introduction of regional trauma networks by the DGU has made a substantial contribution to the comprehensive compilation of severely injured patients and allows increasingly more detailed information on the epidemiology of severe injuries in Germany to be compiled.