Diagnosis and management of sleep apnea by a clinical nurse: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: References for the evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea often exceed the sleep clinic's capacity. We aimed to assess the noninferiority of a nurse-communicated model compared with a traditional physician-led model for the initial management of uncomplicated obstructive sleep apnea in the sleep clinic. METHODS: In this noninferiority, open-label randomized controlled trial, patients referred for the evaluation of uncomplicated obstructive sleep apnea (home sleep apnea test with respiratory event index ≥ 20 events/h) were randomized to a nurse-communicated or a physician-led management. The primary endpoint was noninferiority in the mean change from baseline of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score at 3 and 6 months, assuming a noninferiority margin of -2.0 points. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (Quebec Sleep Questionnaire) and positive airway pressure adherence. RESULTS: Two hundred participants were randomized to a nurse-communicated (n = 101) or physician-led management (n = 99). Overall, 48 participants were lost at follow-up (27.7% and 20.4% in the nurse-communicated and physician-led groups, respectively). Most participants were treated with positive airway pressure (78.2% and 80.6% in the nurse-communicated and physician-led management groups, respectively). There was substantial missing data for the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (33% and 58% at 3 and 6 months in the nurse-communicated group and 29% and 55% in the physician-led group) and Quebec Sleep Questionnaire (86% and 91% at 3 and 6 months and 79.6% and 85.7% in the physician-led group). The difference in mean change between groups for the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was -0.71 (95% confidence interval -2.25 to 0.83) at 3 months and -0.21 (95% confidence interval -1.85 to 1.45) at 6 months. For each domain of the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire at 3 and 6 months, the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin. Positive airway pressure adherence was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with uncomplicated obstructive sleep apnea, nurse-communicated management was noninferior to physician-led management in terms of sleepiness, quality of life, and positive airway pressure adherence at 6 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Management of Sleep Apnea Patients by a Clinical Nurse (Supernurse), URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03455920; Identifier: NCT03455920. CITATION: Lajoie AC, Privé A, Roy-Hallé A, Pagé D, Simard S, Séries F. Diagnosis and management of sleep apnea by a clinical nurse: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(1):89-97.

Do obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients underestimate their daytime symptoms before continuous positive airway pressure treatment?

BACKGROUND: Daytime somnolence is an important feature of the obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) hypopnea syndrome and is usually subjectively assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the scores of the ESS and different domains of the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire (QSQ) assessed before and after the first months of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, as well as retrospectively without treatment. METHODS: The ESS score and domain scores of the QSQ were obtained before and after a three-month period of CPAP treatment using a retrospective assessment of the pretreatment scores in 76 untreated OSA patients. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients completed the study. The ESS and QSQ scores significantly improved following CPAP therapy. Retrospective evaluation of the ESS score was significantly worse than pre- and post-treatment values (mean [± SD] pretreatment score 11.0±4.8; retrospective pretreatment score 13.5±5.1). Such differences were not observed in any domain of the QSQ, including the domain assessing hypersomnolence. CONCLUSION: OSA patients underestimated their sleepiness according to the most widely used instrument to assess hypersomnolence. This finding may not be observed with other methods used to assess OSA-related symptoms such as quality of life questionnaires.