Are the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Cystitis in the Premenopausal, Pregnant, and Postmenopausal Women the Same? A Review of the Literature.

Importance: Acute cystitis is a common condition diagnosed in women. The diagnosis and treatment of this condition change throughout a woman's life. Understanding the differences in diagnosis and treatment in premenopausal, pregnant, and postmenopausal woman increases the likelihood of treatment success and decreases risk of complications from untreated or suboptimally treated infections. Objective: The aim of this review is to describe the incidence, risk factor, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of acute cystitis and the similarities and differences of these aspects of the condition in the premenopausal, pregnant, and postmenopausal woman. Evidence Acquisition: A PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL search was undertaken with the years 1990 to 2020 searched. Results: There were 393 articles identified, with 103 being the basis of review. Multiple risk factors for acute cystitis have been identified and are largely consistent throughout a woman's lifetime with few exceptions. The diagnoses by group with common diagnostic tools, such as urinalysis, vary in specificity and sensitivity between these groups. Management also varies between groups, with pregnancy having specific limitations related to drug safety in regard to possible fetal effects posed by certain medications commonly used to treat acute cystitis. Conclusions: Acute cystitis not only varies in presentation throughout a woman's lifespan, but also in appropriate diagnosis and treatment. Treatment of acute cystitis does have some commonalities between the groups; however, there are contraindications unique to each group. These differences are paramount to not only ensuring appropriate treatment but also treatment success. Relevance: Acute cystitis is a common condition with different diagnostic and management recommendations throughout a woman's lifespan.

Risk of vascular complications in prophylactic compared to emergent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in the management of placenta accreta spectrum.

OBJECTIVE: To compare prophylactic and emergent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) catheter placement in the management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of all patients with PAS (January 2018 to January 2020) at a single tertiary center who underwent prophylactic or emergent REBOA for cesarean hysterectomy for PAS. RESULTS: A total of 16 pregnant patients with PAS underwent percutaneous REBOA placement by acute care surgeons in collaboration with a multi-disciplinary PAS team. The REBOA catheter was placed prophylactically in 11 cases and emergently in 5 cases. No complications occurred in the prophylactic placement group. In the emergent placement group, 3 of 4 surviving patients had vascular access site complications requiring intervention. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach for the management of PAS utilizing REBOA is feasible in the setting of both planned and emergent cesarean hysterectomy and can aid in the control of acute hemorrhage. The risk for vascular access site complications related to REBOA catheter placement is higher in the emergent setting compared to prophylactic placement.

Management of Critically Ill Pregnant Patients with COVID-19 Infection in a Rural State.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited data on the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnancy. Arkansas saw an increase in COVID-19 cases in June 2020. The first critically ill pregnant patient was admitted to our institution on May 21st, 2020. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes in critically ill pregnant women with COVID-19 at a single tertiary care center who received remdesivir and convalescent plasma (CCP). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational review of critically ill pregnant women with COVID-19 who received remdesivir and CCP. This study was approved by the institutional review board (#261354). RESULTS: Seven pregnant patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). All received remdesivir and CCP. Six received dexamethasone. The median ICU length of stay (LOS) was 8 days (range 3-17). Patient 1 had multi-organ failure requiring vasopressors, renal dialysis, and had an intrauterine fetal demise. Patients 4 and 6 required mechanical ventilation, were delivered for respiratory distress and were extubated at 2 and 1 days postpartum, respectively. The only common risk factor was obesity. There were no adverse events noted with remdesivir or CCP. CONCLUSION: There is little data regarding the use of remdesivir or CCP for the treatment of COVID-19 in pregnant women. In our cohort, these were well tolerated with no adverse events. Previously reported median ICU LOS in critically ill pregnant women with COVID-19 was 8 days (range 4-15).1 Our study found a similar ICU LOS (8 days; range 3-17). Patient 1 did not receive remdesivir or CCP until transport to our facility on hospital day 3. Excluding patient 1, median ICU LOS was 6.5 days (range 3-9). Our institution's treatment of pregnant women with critical illness with remdesivir, CCP and dexamethasone combined with delivery in select cases has thus far had good outcomes. KEY POINTS: · Combined therapy: remdesivir, CCP, dexamethasone.. · Remdesivir, CCP and dexamethasone was effective in treating critically ill pregnant women with COVID-19.. · No adverse events were associated with combined therapy.. · Delivery improved respiratory status..

Preconception, Antepartum, and Peripartum Care for the Woman With a Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of the Literature.

IMPORTANCE: Spinal cord injury (SCI) may result in temporary or permanent loss of sensory, motor, and autonomic function, presenting unique medical and psychosocial challenges in women during their childbearing years. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the literature and describe the spectrum of pregnancy considerations, complications, and evidence-based obstetric practices in women with SCI. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was undertaken using the search engines of PubMed and Web of Science using the terms "spinal cord injury" or "spinal cord complications" and "pregnancy outcomes" or "pregnancy complications." The search was limited to the English language, and there was no restriction on the years searched. RESULTS: The search identified 174 abstracts, 50 of which are the basis for this review. Pregnancy in women who have experienced an SCI requires a multidisciplinary approach. Common complications during pregnancy include recurrent urinary tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection, hypertension, venous thromboembolism, and autonomic dysreflexia (AD), which is a potentially life-threatening complication. Obstetricians should avoid potential triggers and be familiar with acute management of AD. Postpartum complications include difficulty initiating and maintaining breastfeeding and increased risk of postpartum depression and other mental health issues. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Obstetricians caring for women with an SCI must be familiar with the unique challenges and complications that may occur during pregnancy and puerperium. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: An evidence-based literature review of the care of pregnant women with spinal cord injury.