ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance (MR) angiography to catheter arteriography in endovascular and surgical treatment planning in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients scheduled for catheter arteriography for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease underwent contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography immediately prior to arteriography. A treatment plan was determined by the vascular surgeon, based on MR angiography, who was blinded to the catheter arteriogram. The treatment plan determined by the MR angiogram was compared to the final treatment plan, which was based on the catheter arteriogram and intraluminal pressure measurements. RESULTS: Treatment plans based on MR angiography and catheter arteriography were identical in 10 of 13 patients (71%). For identifying lesions resulting in intervention, MR angiography had sensitivity of 100% and a positive predictive value of 92%. MR angiography had a treatment specific predictive value of 88% for each lesion identified, and 95% for lesions identified in patients evaluated for claudication. If treatment plans were based on MR angiography only, 46% of patients would have avoided catheter arteriography. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography may be an effective alternative to catheter arteriography in endovascular and surgical treatment planning in selected patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease, but larger studies are necessary to confirm this.
Subject(s)
Angiography/methods , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Patient Care Planning , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheterization , Female , Humans , Leg/blood supply , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificitySubject(s)
Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnosis , Diagnostic Imaging , Intermittent Claudication/diagnosis , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/etiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/etiology , Ischemia/diagnosis , Ischemia/etiology , Leg/blood supply , Predictive Value of TestsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of surgery versus pulse-spray thrombolysis and angioplasty in patients with recurrent thrombosis of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) dialysis access grafts. METHODS: We analyzed 96 consecutive interventions for thrombosed PTFE dialysis access grafts in 18 patients. Primary patency after thrombolysis and angioplasty (n = 25) was compared with primary patency following thrombectomy alone (n = 50) or thrombectomy followed by graft revision (n = 21) using life-table analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model that accounted for graft age and number of previous interventions was used to generate the relative risk for recurrent occlusion following therapy. RESULTS: Life-table analysis showed that patency after thrombolysis and angioplasty was greater than that following thrombectomy alone (p = 0.02). After accounting for the age of the graft and the number of previous interventions (average six per patient), the relative risk for recurrent occlusion [3.0; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.5, 6.4] was greater for thrombectomy alone than for thrombolysis/angioplasty [0.6; CI = 0.3, 1.3]. The relative risks of repeat occlusion following thrombolysis/angioplasty [0.6; CI = 0.3, 1.3] and thrombectomy/surgical revision [1.0; CI = 0.5, 1.7] were similar. CONCLUSION: Outcome data from our retrospective study on recurrent thrombosis of PTFE dialysis access grafts suggest that thrombolysis/angioplasty is superior to thrombectomy alone, and equivalent to thrombectomy/surgical revision.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Thrombosis/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Confidence Intervals , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/etiology , Humans , Life Tables , Male , Middle Aged , Polytetrafluoroethylene/adverse effects , Proportional Hazards Models , Recurrence , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Salvage Therapy , Thrombectomy/methods , Thrombosis/etiology , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We compared our ability to make iliac artery measurements on two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with conventional angiography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with lower extremity vascular disease underwent pelvic MR angiography. Parameters of the cardiac-gated axial 2D TOF sequence included a TR/TE of 24/7 msec and a 50 degrees flip angle. Parameters for the three-dimensional MR angiography sequence, in which we obtained 32 coronal 3-mm slices with fat suppression, included a TR/TE of 32/5 msec and a 40 degrees flip angle during infusion of 40 ml of gadolinium-chelated contrast material. Patients then underwent conventional angiography of the iliac arteries. Maximum stenosis in the common iliac, external iliac, and common femoral arteries was then measured. Measurements of stenosis were compared by repeated measures of analysis of variance. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for identification of greater than or equal to 50% stenosis and less than 50% stenosis. RESULTS: For all vessels studied, we found no significant difference in measurements obtained from the gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography technique and those obtained from conventional angiography (p > .05). However, significantly different stenotic measurements were obtained from the 2D TOF MR angiography sequence and conventional angiography. In the external iliac arteries, 2D TOF MR angiography exaggerated stenoses most substantially. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography was more accurate than 2D TOF MR angiography when measuring degree of stenosis in the iliac arteries.
