Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 44(5): 1354-1359, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27115311

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To date, few studies have validated the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v. 2) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Our aim was to validate PI-RADS v.2 using 3 Tesla (T) MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 54 consecutive patients who underwent 3T MRI with a body-array coil for diagnostic confirmation of prostate cancer or cancer staging between June 2013 and June 2015. Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement were calculated based on a criterion of PI-RADS score = 3. Inter-examiner agreement was determined by the weighted kappa statistic. RESULTS: Histological findings were positive for cancer in 33 patients and negative in 21 patients. Considering a PI-RADS score of 3 as positive for cancer, the accuracy of each reader was 85.20% and 70.40%, respectively, and agreement coefficients were κ = 0.69 and κ = 0.35. Considering PI-RADS 3 as absence of cancer, the accuracy of each reader was 77.80% and 77.80%, respectively, and agreement was κ = 0.55 and κ = 0.54. Inter-reader agreement was moderate/good (weighted κ = 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.66; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: High accuracy was obtained for the diagnosis of prostate cancer using 3T MRI with a body coil and the PI-RADS v.2 score. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1354-1359.


Subject(s)
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiology Information Systems/standards , Transducers/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Equipment Design , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Internationality , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...