Plasma protein binding and blood-free concentrations: which studies are needed to develop a drug?

INTRODUCTION: The plasma protein binding of drugs and metabolites is known to influence their pharmacokinetics and, therefore, their effects. Evaluating the extent and the linearity of protein binding is an essential piece of information that has to be generated during drug development. Blood cell partitioning has a similar relevance. AREAS COVERED: This paper summarizes the regulatory requirements and focuses particularly on two questions pertaining to the drug development process. The first of these questions asks when is it necessary to perform detailed clinical studies on protein binding while the second asks whether the in vitro studies presently performed in plasma produce biased information. EXPERT OPINION: The authors propose that clinical ex vivo protein-binding studies should be performed on highly bound compounds (a definition of highly bound is suggested as > 95%). They also propose that in vitro studies, to measure the free drug, should be performed in whole blood, rather than in plasma, particularly if binding to proteins or blood cells is nonlinear.

A novel and integrated approach for the identification and characterization of drug-induced cardiac toxicity in the dog.

Cardiovascular toxicity represents one of the major reasons for the termination of the development of drugs, even in late development phases. This growing issue is often not restricted to specific therapeutic areas, and it is gaining critical importance, in particular for chronically administered drugs, highlighting the limitations in terms of sensitivity of the current investigational paradigms. Furthermore, drug-related changes may become evident after long-term administration for different reasons, including accumulation of the drug in the heart. This article describes how the integrated use of investigational tools represents a powerful approach for the early identification and characterization of cardiotoxicity in preclinical development. Cardiac changes were observed in the dog after long-term oral administration of casopitant, a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist, developed for the treatment of depression and anxiety. Different approaches and sensitive biomarkers were used in a time-course study to investigate the onset, progression, and reversibility of the lesion. The integrated evaluation of cardiovascular parameters, electron microscopy, troponin I, and natriuretic peptide results highlighted any minimal early changes, allowing the full and deep characterization of the lesion. The outcome of this study was the driver for drug development decision making on casopitant and backup drugs.

Drug and metabolite concentrations in tissues in relationship to tissue adverse findings: a review.

INTRODUCTION: Drug blood (or plasma) levels measured during safety preclinical investigations do not always correlate with toxicological findings. Concentrations in target tissues or, even better, at target receptors would probably be more relevant. In addition, toxicity may be caused by drug metabolites which, in turn, can be tissue specific. Tissue concentrations and tissue metabolism may be crucial for interpreting tissue toxicity. AREAS COVERED: This paper, starting from the authors' direct experience, focuses on distribution of the parent compound and metabolites in target toxicity tissues and presents a review of several examples where organ or tissue concentrations have been either useful or not relevant for interpreting safety findings. Regulatory aspects and technological progresses are also mentioned. EXPERT OPINION: The authors advocate directing more attention and efforts toward investigating tissue distribution: this approach might reduce late stage attrition. When unexpected tissue toxicity is found, measuring drug concentrations in the target tissue and characterising and measuring tissue metabolites could bring relevant information for interpreting the adverse finding. Evidence of slow accumulation of a long lasting metabolite in a tissue should be considered as an alert: this evidence can be obtained during short-term toxicity studies.

Tissue distribution and characterization of drug-related material in rats and dogs after repeated oral administration of casopitant.

Casopitant [1-piperidinecarboxamide,4-(4-acetyl-1-piperazinyl)-N-((1R)-1-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-ethyl)-2-(4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl)-N-methyl-(2R,4S)] has been shown to be a potent and selective antagonist of the human neurokinin 1 receptor, the primary receptor for substance P. During long-term toxicity studies conducted in rat and dog, evidence of cardiomyopathy and increased cardiac weight were observed. The distribution and metabolism of casopitant were studied in both species evaluating the accumulation of drug-related material (DRM) after repeat dosing and its potential relationship with pathological findings observed in myocardium. After repeat oral administration of [(14)C]casopitant to rats (20 days) and dogs (14 days), DRM was quantifiable in all of the tissues examined with lung and liver containing the highest level of radioactivity. The concentration of radioactivity was significantly higher in tissues than in plasma, declining slowly and still quantifiable after a recovery period of 20 days. The principal circulating components identified in both species were casopitant, M12 (oxidized deacetylated), M13 (hydroxylated piperazine), and M31 and M134 (two N-dealkylated piperazines). In tissues, a similar metabolic pattern was observed, in which casopitant, M31, M134, M76 (N-deacetylated), and M200 (N-deacetylated N,N-deethylated) were the major components quantified. After a 26-week repeat dose study in dog, casopitant and M13 were the major circulating components, whereas in myocardium, M200 and M134 were the major ones and their levels increased over time, reaching considerable concentrations (millimolar magnitude). After a washout period, all circulating derivatives decreased to undetectable levels, whereas M200 was still the major component in myocardium. Overall DRM in plasma did not correlate with the respective concentrations in tissues.

Casopitant: in vitro data and SimCyp simulation to predict in vivo metabolic interactions involving cytochrome P450 3A4.

Casopitant [1-piperidinecarboxamide,4-(4-acetyl-1-piperazinyl)-N-((1R)-1-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-ethyl)-2-(4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl)-N-methyl-(2R,4S), GW679769] has previously been shown to be a potent and selective antagonist of the human neurokinin-1 receptor, the primary receptor of substance P, both in vitro and in vivo, with good brain penetration properties. On the basis of this mode of action it was evaluated for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting, and for the chronic treatment of anxiety, depression, insomnia, and overactive bladder. Casopitant is shown to be a substrate, an inhibitor, and an inducer of CYP3A4, and, because of this complex behavior, it was difficult to identify the primary mechanism by which it may give rise to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of clinical relevance. Moreover, the major circulating metabolite is itself an inhibitor of CYP3A4 in vitro. On the basis of the different clinical indications and the various potential comedications of casopitant, a relevant part of the clinical development plan was focused on the assessment of the importance of clinical DDIs. The present study provides an overview of the DDI potential profile of casopitant, based on in vitro data and clinical evidence of its interaction with CYP3A4 probe substrates midazolam and nifedipine, the strong inhibitor ketoconazole, and the inducer rifampin. Overall, the clinical data confirm the ability of casopitant to interact with CYP3A4 substrates, inhibitors, or inducers. The in vitro data are accurate and robust enough to build a reliable SimCyp population-based model to estimate the potential DDIs of casopitant and to minimize the clinical studies recommended.

Effect of single and repeat doses of casopitant on the pharmacokinetics of CYP450 3A4 substrates midazolam and nifedipine.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of single and repeated doses casopitant on the pharmacokinetics of single dose midazolam and nifedipine (CYP3A substrates) in healthy subjects. The effect on debrisoquine metabolism (CYP2D6 substrate) was also assessed. METHODS: Three open-label studies were conducted in healthy subjects. In the first study subjects received single dose 50 or 100 mg oral casopitant, single dose 5 mg oral midazolam and single dose 10 mg oral debrisoquine. In the other two studies subjects received repeated doses of 10 mg (study 2), 30, or 120 mg oral casopitant and single doses of 5 mg oral midazolam (study 2) and single doses of 10 mg oral nifedipine (study 3). Plasma concentration-time data were analyzed using standard non-compartmental methods. The effect of casopitant on all probes was assessed using geometric means ratios and corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The AUC(0,∞) of midazolam was increased 1.44-fold (90% CI 1.35, 1.54) and 1.52-fold (90% CI 1.41, 1.65) after co-administration with a single dose of 50 or 100 mg casopitant, respectively. Debrisoquine metabolism was unchanged. After 3 days of casopitant administration, midazolam AUC(0,∞) was increased 1.45- (90% CI 1.32, 1.59), 2.02- (90% CI 1.75, 2.32), and 2.67-fold (90% CI 2.18, 3.27) after co-administration with 10, 30 or 120 mg casopitant, respectively. After 14 days of casopitant administration, midazolam AUC(0,∞) was increased 1.51- (90% CI 1.40, 1.63) to 3.49-fold (90% CI 2.98, 4.08). After 3 days of casopitant administration, nifedipine AUC(0,∞) was increased 1.56- (90% CI 1.37, 1.78) and 1.77-fold (90% CI 1.54, 2.04) after co-administration with 30 or 120 mg casopitant, respectively. Similar increases in nifedipine exposure were observed after 14 days of casopitant administration. CONCLUSIONS: Casopitant is a dose- and duration-dependent weak to moderate inhibitor of CYP3A.

Metabolic disposition of casopitant, a potent neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, in mice, rats, and dogs.

Casopitant [1-piperidinecarboxamide,4-(4-acetyl-1-piperazinyl)-N-((1R)-1-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-ethyl)-2-(4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl)-N-methyl-(2R,4S)] is a potent and selective antagonist of the neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor, developed for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of [(14)C]casopitant have been investigated in the mouse, rat, and dog after single oral administration and compared with those in humans. [(14)C]Casopitant was rapidly absorbed in all three species: the maximum plasma concentration of radioactivity was generally observed 0.5 to 2 h after a single oral dose. In dog and female rat, as observed for humans, the principal circulating radiolabeled components were unchanged casopitant and its hydroxylated derivative M13. In rats, there was an evident sex-related difference in the rate of elimination of drug-related material with elimination being more rapid in males than in females. In dogs and mice, no notable sex differences were observed in the pattern of excretion. The elimination of drug-related radioactivity was largely by metabolism, with metabolites excreted primarily in the feces. The predominant route of metabolism was the oxidation of the parent molecule, observed together with loss of the N-acetyl group, N-demethylation, and modification of piperazine with consequent opening and cleavage of the ring, giving a complex pattern of metabolites. Conjugation of some of those oxidized products with glucuronic acid was observed. Urinary excretion in all three species was a minor route of elimination, accounting for between 2 and 7% of the dose, with unchanged parent drug never quantifiable.