Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
BMC Pulm Med ; 24(1): 122, 2024 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454418

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The existing respiratory fit test panels (RFTPs) are based on Bivariate and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) which utilise American and Chinese head and facial dimensions. As RFTPs based on local facial anthropometric data for Malaysia are not available, this study was conducted with the aim to develop new RFTPs using Malaysian data. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted across Malaysia among 3,324 participants of the study of National Health and Morbidity Survey 2020 aged 18 and above. Ten head and facial dimensions were measured. Face length and face width were used to construct bivariate facial panel, whereas the scores from the first two PCA were used to develop the PCA panel. RESULTS: This study showed that Malaysians have the widest upper limit for facial width. It also found that three factors could be reduced from the PCA analysis. However only 2 factors were selected with PCA 1 representing head and facial size and PCA 2 representing facial shape. Our bivariate panel could accommodate 95.0% of population, while our PCA panel accommodated 95.6%. CONCLUSION: This was the first study to use Malaysian head and facial anthropometry data to create bivariate and PCA panels. Respirators constructed using these panels are likely to fit ≥ 95.0% of Malaysia's population.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Respiratory Protective Devices , Southeast Asian People , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Equipment Design , Face/anatomy & histology , Malaysia
2.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1208348, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37965510

ABSTRACT

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may transmit through airborne route particularly when the aerosol particles remain in enclosed spaces with inadequate ventilation. There has been no standard recommended method of determining the virus in air due to limitations in pre-analytical and technical aspects. Furthermore, the presence of low virus loads in air samples could result in false negatives. Our study aims to explore the feasibility of detecting SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) in air samples using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). Active and passive air sampling was conducted between December 2021 and February 2022 with the presence of COVID-19 confirmed cases in two hospitals and a quarantine center in Klang Valley, Malaysia. SARS-CoV-2 RNA in air was detected and quantified using ddPCR and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The comparability of two different digital PCR platforms (QX200 and QIAcuity) to RT-PCR were also investigated. Additionally negative staining transmission electron microscopy was performed to visualize virus ultrastructure. Detection rates of SARS-CoV-2 in air samples using ddPCR were higher compared to RT-PCR, which were 15.2% (22/145) and 3.4% (5/145), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR was 100 and 87%, respectively. After excluding 17 negative samples (50%) by both QX200 and QIAcuity, 15% samples (5/34) were found to be positive both ddPCR and dPCR. There were 23.5% (8/34) samples that were detected positive by ddPCR but negative by dPCR. In contrast, there were 11.7% (4/34) samples that were detected positive by dPCR but negative by ddPCR. The SARS-CoV-2 detection method by ddPCR is precise and has a high sensitivity for viral RNA detection. It could provide advances in determining low viral titter in air samples to reduce false negative reports, which could complement detection by RT-PCR.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , RNA, Viral/analysis , Viral Load/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , COVID-19 Testing
3.
PLoS One ; 18(11): e0288105, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38019763

ABSTRACT

This study examined the association of various brands of NIOSH-certified N95 filtering face-piece respirators (FFR) fit with facial dimensions and gender. One hundred and thirty-five participants (77 females and 58 males) were recruited from the previous facial anthropometry study among Malaysians in 2020. Quantitative respirator fit testing of six FFR were performed using the TSI Portacount Pro+ 8038 which comprised of four exercises (bending over, talking, up-down head movement, and side to side head movement). An overall fit factor (FF) of ≥ 100 was considered a pass for each FFR. Analysis was done using T-test, Pearson's correlations, and generalised linear regression. The passing rates for the six FFR were 36.3% (Cup B), 50.4% (Trifold A), 54.1% (Duckbill A), 57.0% (Cup A), 74.1% (Trifold B), and 83.7% (Duckbill B). Both Duckbill B and Trifold B had the highest passing rates for both genders. However, certain FFR models (Cup B, Trifold A, Trifold B, and Duckbill A) fit better for participants with large facial size who were mostly males, while others (Cup A and Duckbill B) specifically fit better for those with small facial size, who were mostly females. This study showed significant positive effect of nose protrusion, nasal root and subnasale-sellion and the negative effect of menton-sellion, bigonial breadth and nose breadth on fit factors of various FFR. The results of this study emphasized the importance of choosing and designing FFR based on local anthropometry data, with careful consideration on the dimensions that affect the respirator fit. Since N95 are commonly used in the healthcare settings to prevent airborne transmission, the practice of respirator fit testing and selecting N95 with high passing rates for healthcare workers need to be emphasized.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Respiratory Protective Devices , Humans , Male , Female , Equipment Design , Materials Testing , Anthropometry , N95 Respirators , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control
4.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1028443, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36935685

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) have been continually exposed to patients with COVID-19 and are at higher risk of contracting the disease. Their psychological health is important for overall wellbeing and productivity, which could lead to a reduction in human errors during the pandemic crisis. This study aimed to measure the level of concerns, work practices, adequacy of preventive measures among HCWs, and the impacts on their life and work, including mental health status during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed randomly to 1,050 HCWs from the Ministry of Health facilities in the Klang Valley who were involved directly in managing or screening COVID-19 cases from May to August 2020. The questionnaire was divided into five domains, which were concerns, impact on life and work, practice, perceived adequacy of preventive measures, and Revised Impact of Event Scale (IES-R). Logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic predictors of the five domains. Results: A total of 907 respondents (86.4%) participated in this survey. Approximately half of the respondents had a low concern (50.5%), most of them had a good practice (85.1%), with 67.5% perceiving there were adequate preventive measures, and they perceived the outbreak had a low impact (92%) on their life and work. From the IES-R domain, 18.6% of respondents potentially suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Conclusion: During the second wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in Malaysia, HCWs practiced high levels of precautions and preventive measures because they were aware of the risk of infection as an occupational hazard. With the adequate implementation of policy and control measures, the psychological wellbeing of the majority HCWs remained well and adequately supported.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Malaysia/epidemiology , Health Personnel/psychology
5.
Sci Total Environ ; 874: 162130, 2023 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36804978

ABSTRACT

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that approximately 4.2 million premature deaths worldwide were attributable to exposure to particulate matter 2.5 µm (PM2.5). This study assessed the environmental burden of disease attributable to PM2.5 at the national level in Malaysia. We estimated the population-weighted exposure level (PWEL) of PM10 concentrations in Malaysia for 2000, 2008, and 2013 using aerosol optical density (AOD) data from publicly available remote sensing satellite data (MODIS Terra). The PWEL was then converted to PM2.5 using Malaysia's WHO ambient air conversion factor. We used AirQ+ 2.0 software to calculate all-cause (natural), ischemic heart disease (IHD), stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer (LC), and acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) excess deaths from the National Burden of Disease data for 2000, 2008 and 2013. The average PWELs for annual PM2.5 for 2000, 2008, and 2013 were 22 µg m-3, 18 µg m-3 and 24 µg m-3, respectively. Using the WHO 2005 Air Quality Guideline cut-off point of PM2.5 of 10 µg m-3, the estimated excess deaths for 2000, 2008, and 2013 from all-cause (natural) mortality were between 5893 and 9781 (95 % CI: 3347-12,791), COPD was between 164 and 957 (95 % CI: 95-1411), lung cancer was between 109 and 307 (95 % CI: 63-437), IHD was between 3 and 163 deaths, according to age groups (95 % CI: 2-394) and stroke was between 6 and 155 deaths, according to age groups (95 % CI: 3-261). An increase in estimated health endpoints was associated with increased estimated PWEL PM2.5 for 2013 compared to 2000 and 2008. Adhering the ambient PM2.5 level to the Malaysian Air Quality Standard IT-2 would reduce the national health endpoints mortality.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution , Lung Neoplasms , Myocardial Ischemia , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Stroke , Humans , Air Pollutants/analysis , Malaysia/epidemiology , Environmental Exposure , Particulate Matter/analysis , Air Pollution/analysis , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology
6.
Front Public Health ; 10: 972249, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36091510

ABSTRACT

Background: Existing anthropometric studies for respirator designs are based on the head and facial dimensions of Americans and Chinese nationals, with no studies for multi-ethnic countries like Malaysia. This study aimed to create head and facial morphological database for Malaysia, specifically to identify morphological differences between genders, ethnicities, and birthplaces, as well as predictors of the dimensions. Design: A cross-sectional study. Setting: Malaysia. Participants: A nation-wide cross-sectional study using a complex survey design with two stage-stratified random sampling was conducted among 3,324 participants, aged 18 years and above who were also participants of the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2020. Primary and secondary outcomes: The study collected data on sociodemographic, measurement of Body Mass Index (BMI) and 10 head and facial dimensions (3 dimensions were measured using direct measurement, and 7 others using Digimizer software for 2-dimension images). Linear regression was performed to determine the association between gender, ethnicity, birthplace, age and BMI and the dimensions. Results: There were significant differences in all the dimensions between sex, birthplace and ethnicity (p < 0.005). Further analysis using linear regression showed sex, ethnicity, birthplace, age and BMI were significant predictors of the dimensions. In comparison to studies from the United States and China, our study population had a wider interpupillary distance and nose breadth for both male and female participants, but smaller bigonial breadth and smaller minimal frontal breadth. Conclusion: These findings could assist in the design and sizing of respirators that will fit Malaysians and possibly other Southeast Asian population.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Respiratory Protective Devices , Cross-Sectional Studies , Equipment Design , Face/anatomy & histology , Female , Humans , Malaysia , Male , United States , Ventilators, Mechanical
7.
Front Public Health ; 10: 878396, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35923958

ABSTRACT

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of contracting coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in their workplace. Infection prevention guidelines and standard operating procedures were introduced to reduce risk of exposure and prevent transmission. Safe practices during interaction with patients with COVID-19 are crucial for infection prevention and control (IPC). This study aimed to assess HCWs' compliance to IPC and to determine its association with sociodemographic and organizational factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted between March and April 2021 at public healthcare facilities in the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia. HCWs who were involved with COVID-19-related works were invited to participate in the online survey. The questionnaire was adapted from the World Health Organization (WHO) Interim Guidance: WHO Risk Assessment and Management of Exposure of Healthcare Workers in the Context of COVID-19. Respondents were categorized as compliant or non-compliant to IPC. A total of 600 HCWs involved in COVID-19-related works participated in the survey. Most of them (63.7%) were compliant to IPC as they responded to all items as "always, as recommended" during interaction with patients with COVID-19. The multivariate analysis showed that non-compliance was significantly associated with working in the emergency department (AOR = 3.16; 95% CI = 1.07-9.31), working as laboratory personnel (AOR = 15.13; 95% CI = 1.36-168.44), health attendant (AOR = 4.42; 95% CI = 1.74-11.24), and others (AOR = 3.63; 95% CI = 1.1-12.01), as well as work experience of more than 10 years (AOR = 4.71; 95% CI = 1.28-17.27). The odds of non-compliance among respondents without adequate new norms and personal protective equipment training were 2.02 (95% CI = 1.08-3.81) more than those with adequate training. Although most of the respondents complied to IPC protocols, compliance status differed according to department, work category, and years of service. Ensuring adequate training that will hopefully lead to behavioral change is crucial to prevent breach in IPC and thus minimize the risk of exposure to and transmission of COVID-19 in healthcare facilities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Personnel , Humans , Malaysia/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control
8.
J Environ Public Health ; 2020: 1561823, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32351580

ABSTRACT

Particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 µm or less (PM10) pollution poses a considerable threat to human health, and the first step in quantifying health impacts of human exposure to PM10 pollution is exposure assessment. Population-weighted exposure level (PWEL) estimation is one of the methods that provide a more refined exposure assessment as it includes the spatiotemporal distribution of the population into the pollution concentration estimation. This study assessed the population weighting effects on the estimated PM10 concentrations in Malaysia for years 2000, 2008, and 2013. Estimated PM10 annual mean concentrations with a spatial resolution of 5 kilometres retrieved from satellite data and population count obtained from the Gridded Population of the World version 4 (GPWv4) from the Centre for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) were overlaid to generate the PWEL of PM10 for each state. The calculated PWEL of PM10 concentrations were then classified based on the World Health Organization (WHO) and the national Air Quality Guidelines (AQG) and interim targets (IT) for comparison. Results revealed that the annual mean PM10 concentrations in Malaysia ranged from 31 to 73 µg/m3 but became generally lower, ranging from 20 to 72 µg/m3 after population weighting, suggesting that the PM10 population exposure in Malaysia might have been overestimated. PWEL of PM10 distribution showed that the majority of the population lived in areas that complied with the national AQG, but were vulnerable to exposure level 3 according to the WHO AQG and IT, indicating that the population was nevertheless potentially exposed to significant health effects from long-term exposure to PM10 pollution.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Particulate Matter/analysis , Air Pollution/analysis , Environmental Monitoring , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/standards , Malaysia , Particle Size , Particulate Matter/chemistry , Spatio-Temporal Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...