Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Asia Pac J Public Health ; 28(1): 61-71, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26646422

ABSTRACT

Pacific Islanders experience high rates of cervical cancer incidence and mortality. This cross-sectional study examined the extent to which Samoan, Chamorro, and Tongan women's perceived receipt of social support from their husbands or male partners was associated with rates of routine cancer screening- specifically Pap testing. A total of 585 Pacific Islander women who live in the United States completed a self-report survey. Women who reported having a Pap test within the past 3 years had significantly higher scores on support from their husbands/male partners. Furthermore, the relationship of emotional support and informational support with increased Pap testing was significantly stronger for Tongan women. The findings suggest that men play an important role in promoting women's cancer prevention behaviors in Pacific Islander and potentially other collectivistic populations. Incorporating social support messages into interventions may be a simple yet effective strategy to increase women's Pap testing.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/psychology , Papanicolaou Test/statistics & numerical data , Social Support , Spouses/psychology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Self Report , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/ethnology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Young Adult
2.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 9(3): 389-96, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26548790

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pacific Islanders (PIs) experience high cervical cancer rates in the United States. Stage of diagnosis is also later for PIs than non-Hispanic Whites. The Pap test is severely underutilized among PIs: only 71% of Asian American and Pacific Islander women age 25 years or older received a Pap test within the last 3 years (U.S. average, 82%). Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is increasingly seen as an essential approach in designing and conducting culturally relevant and appropriate studies that reduce cancer incidence and other health disparities among minority and other medically underserved populations. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to describe the lessons learned thus far regarding the identification, recruitment, and retention of PI community organizations and members into a CBPR-informed, randomized, community trial promoting Pap testing. METHODS: This 5-year study used CBPR to develop and test the efficacy of a social support intervention for Chamorro, Samoan, and Tongan women to increase Pap testing in southern California. Eligible women were between the ages of 21 and 65, and married or in a long-term relationship with a man for at least 5 years. Women and their husbands or significant others received a 2-hour, culturally tailored workshop that include a group activity, information on Pap testing, a video, and corresponding materials. Comparison participants received a brochure about Pap testing. Three waves of data are collected from all participants: pretest (before workshop or brochure), posttest 1 (immediately after workshop or brochure), and posttest 2 (6 months follow-up). RESULTS: Of the 76 organizations approached to participate in the study, 67 (88.2%) eventually agreed to participate. Thus far, 473 women and 419 men completed the study pretest, post-test, education, and 6-month follow-up. Only 242 women and 204 men of the eligible participants have completed the follow-up survey (63.5% of women and 60.5% of men retained after 6 months). LESSONS LEARNED: The main strategy to overcome initial recruitment challenges was study staff persistence, because they averaged five contacts with each church or clan leader before receiving confirmation that an educational session can be scheduled. Personal connections provided an introduction to the most appropriate church or clan leader. Other efforts for retention include creation of an online version of the survey, re-attending church services, and creating special events organized around clan activities. CONCLUSIONS: Although CBPR improves the cultural competence and relevance of study activities for ethnically diverse populations, selected past research shows that it does not ensure that such designs overcome all of the unique challenges in ethnically diverse communities. PI-specific organizational recruitment and individual retention is influenced by study issues and cultural factors in each community.


Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Papanicolaou Test/statistics & numerical data , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , California , Cultural Competency , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Patient Selection , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Social Support , Young Adult
3.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 9(3): 457-63, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26548798

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Challenges in community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships often pertain to trust and power, dilemmas posed by funding sources, and equitable community participation. Although challenges in CBPR can be welcomed because they present opportunities for growth and development of partnerships, tools are needed to facilitate issue identification and resolution. Moreover, such tools need to align with CBPR principles involving equal feedback among partners to improve the partnership and its outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To describe how appreciative inquiry (AI) was used as an evaluation tool to contribute to the strengthening of empowerment of ongoing and future community-university relationships in CBPR collaborations. METHODS: AI was applied at the end of a community-university partnership to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among Tongan women in Southern California. Through individual interviews and group discussion, tensions were identified and discussed in light of partnership and community strengths. RESULTS: Through AI, program staff emphasized community and university strengths of shared key values related to the program and aspects of program management that enabled them to contribute to successful program outcomes. They also discussed the following challenges: 1) approach of partners, 2) role definition, and 3) and time span of program development and implementation. Based on these discussions, recommendations were made to overcome current challenges and improve ongoing and future CBPR collaborations. CONCLUSIONS: The AI process helped the partners recommit to collaborate with each other, renewed their excitement about working together, and assisted with reclarification of their roles to inform future collaborations.


Subject(s)
Community Participation/methods , Community-Based Participatory Research/methods , Community-Institutional Relations , Early Detection of Cancer , Program Evaluation/methods , Breast Neoplasms , California , Female , Humans , Power, Psychological , Program Development/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...