Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Curr Environ Health Rep ; 10(4): 410-416, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884803

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Control banding (CB) is a risk assessment strategy that has been applied globally to a variety of occupational hazards. This article describes how this method can be applied, recent developments in the CB literature, an example of how it is utilized for a large, diverse worksite, and where the future of CB is headed. RECENT FINDINGS: Over the past several years, the applications of CB have widened significantly and have accordingly helped bolster the public and occupational safety, health, and hygiene (OSHH) professionals' understanding of occupational exposure to various hazards. The fields of workplace chemicals, nanomaterials, and airborne pathogens (i.e., COVID-19), specifically have seen remarkable increases in the development of CB tools. Extensive CB tool validation efforts have also lent increasing credibility to this alternative approach. CB is a simplified strategy of assessing occupational exposures and providing commensurate controls and solutions to reduce workplace risks. CB can be used as a primary or tiered risk assessment and risk management approach which can be utilized by both OSHH professionals and nonexperts alike to identify solutions for reducing work-related exposures. The need for health and safety expertise will continue to grow as technological advancements, environmental changes, and economic forces increase workplace hazard complexity, and CB will continue to be a useful tool for those performing risk assessments.


Subject(s)
Nanostructures , Occupational Exposure , Occupational Health , Humans , Risk Assessment/methods , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Workplace
2.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 65(8): 979-987, 2021 10 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33999132

ABSTRACT

Reuse of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs, commonly referred to as N95s) normally meant for single use has become common in healthcare facilities due to shortages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we report that murine hepatitis coronavirus initially seeded on FFR filter material is inactivated (6 order of magnitude reduction as measured by median tissue culture infective dose, TCID50) after dry heating at 75°C for 30 min. We also find that the quantitative fit of FFRs after heat treatment at this temperature, under dry conditions or at 90% relative humidity, is not affected by single or 10 heating cycles. Previous studies have reported that the filtration efficiency of FFRs is not negatively impacted by these heating conditions. These results suggest that thermal inactivation of coronaviruses is a potentially rapid and widely deployable method to reuse N95 FFRs in emergency situations where reusing FFRs is a necessity and broad-spectrum sterilization is unavailable. However, we also observe that a radiative heat source (e.g. an exposed heating element) results in rapid qualitative degradation of the FFR. Finally, we discuss differences in the results reported here and other recent studies investigating heat as a means to recycle FFRs. These differences suggest that while our repeated decontamination cycles do not affect FFR fit, overall wear time and the number of donning/doffing cycles are important factors that likely degrade FFR fit and must be investigated further.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Exposure , Animals , Hot Temperature , Humans , Mice , N95 Respirators , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 65(1): 63-83, 2021 01 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32820323

ABSTRACT

This study presents a quantitative validation of 15 Similar Exposure Groups (SEGs) that were derived via control bands inherent to the Risk Level Based Management System currently being used at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. For 93% of the SEGs that were evaluated, statistical analyses of personal exposure monitoring data, through Bayesian Decision Analysis (BDA), demonstrated that the controls implemented from the initial control bands assigned to these SEGs were at least as protective as the controls from the control band outcomes derived from the quantitative data. The BDA also demonstrated that for 40% of the SEGs, the controls from the initial control bands were overly protective, thus allowing controls to be downgraded, which resulted in a significant saving of environmental safety and health (ES&H) resources. Therefore, as a means to both confirm existing controls and to identify candidate SEGs for downgrading controls, efforts to continuously improve the accuracy of Control Banding (CB) strategies through the routine quantitative validation of SEGs are strongly encouraged. Targeted collaborative efforts across institutions and even countries for both the development of CB strategies and the validation of discreetly defined SEGs of commonly performed tasks will not only optimize limited ES&H resources but will also assist in providing a simplified process for essential risk communication at the worker level to the benefit of billions of workers around the world.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Bayes Theorem , Humans , Safety Management
4.
Saf Health Work ; 10(3): 389-392, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31497338

ABSTRACT

When conducting an exposure assessment, the primary goal of the industrial hygienist is to fully characterize the worker's exposure during a work shift to compare it with an occupational exposure limit. This applies regardless of the duration of the work activity as an activity that is relatively short in duration can still present exposure in excess of the occupational exposure limit even when normalized over an 8-hr shift. This goal, however, is often impeded by the specification of a minimum sample volume in the published sampling method, which may prevent the sample from being collected or submitted for analysis. Removing the specification of minimum sample volume (or adjusting it from a requirement to a recommendation), in contrast, allows for a broader assessment of jobs that consist of short-duration and high-exposure activities and also eliminates the unnecessary practice of running sampling pumps in clean air to collect a specified, minimum volume.

5.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 63(8): 898-917, 2019 10 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31433845

ABSTRACT

Eleven years (by publication) years after the development and application of the control banding (CB) Nanotool for the qualitative assessment and control of engineered nanoparticles (ENP), there remains no quantitative gold standard to serve as an alternative to the qualitative assessment. Many CB models have been developed during the years subsequent to the initial development of the CB Nanotool and the literature continues to blossom with comparisons and applications of these various tools; however, these developments have hitherto been made in the absence of validating and verifying their effectiveness using existing, albeit limited, quantitative methods. This paper reviews the existing literature on the CB Nanotool to evaluate its effectiveness in a variety of settings and presents a summary of qualitative and quantitative information from its application in a broad range of ENP handling activities performed in two different research institutions. A total of 28 ENP activities were assessed using the CB Nanotool (Version 2.0). Due to the lack of guidance on a single exposure assessment methodology, a combination of real-time monitoring, filter analysis, and microscopic analysis was used to assess various quantitative metrics, including mass concentration, particle number concentration, and particle speciation. All the results indicated that the control outcomes from the CB Nanotool qualitative assessment were sufficient to prevent workers from being exposed to ENP at levels beyond established exposure limits or background levels. These data represent an independent quantitative validation of CB Nanotool risk level outcomes and give further credence to the use of the CB Nanotool to effectively control worker exposures in the absence of quantitative air monitoring results.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/methods , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Nanoparticles/toxicity , Nanotechnology/methods , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Humans , Particle Size , Risk Assessment/methods
6.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 14(6): 438-447, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28278063

ABSTRACT

This article presents air and surface sampling data collected over the first two years since beryllium was introduced as a target material at the National Ignition Facility. Over this time, 101 experiments with beryllium-containing targets were executed. The data provides an assessment of current conditions in the facility and a baseline for future impacts as new, reduced regulatory limits for beryllium are being proposed by both the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Department of Energy. This study also investigates how beryllium deposits onto exposed surfaces as a result of x-ray vaporization and the effectiveness of simple decontamination measures in reducing the amount of removable beryllium from a surface. Based on 1,961 surface wipe samples collected from entrant components (equipment directly exposed to target debris) and their surrounding work areas during routine reconfiguration activities, only one result was above the beryllium release limit of 0.2 µg/100 cm2 and 27 results were above the analytical reporting limit of 0.01 µg/100 cm2, for a beryllium detection rate of 1.4%. Surface wipe samples collected from the internal walls of the NIF target chamber, however, showed higher levels of beryllium, with beryllium detected on 73% and 87% of the samples during the first and second target chamber entries (performed annually), respectively, with 23% of the samples above the beryllium release limit during the second target chamber entry. The analysis of a target chamber wall panel exposed during the first 30 beryllium-containing experiments (cumulatively) indicated that 87% of the beryllium contamination remains fixed onto the surface after wet wiping the surface and 92% of the non-fixed contamination was removed by decontaminating the surface using a dry wipe followed by a wet wipe. Personal airborne exposures assessed during access to entrant components and during target chamber entry indicated that airborne beryllium was not present in workers' breathing zones. All the data thus far have shown that beryllium has been effectively managed to prevent exposures to workers during routine and non-routine work.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Beryllium/analysis , Equipment Contamination , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Air Pollutants, Occupational/toxicity , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/toxicity , Beryllium/toxicity , California , Decontamination/methods , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Volatilization , X-Rays
7.
PLoS One ; 11(3): e0151022, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26942764

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about health outcomes related to electronic cigarette (EC) use, despite its growing popularity. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between EC use and asthma. METHODS: The study design is a cross-sectional study. A total of 35,904 high school students were included as the final study population. The presence of asthma was based on a student's self-reported doctor diagnosis of asthma in the past 12 months. RESULTS: Prevalence rates of asthmatics in 'current EC users' (n = 2,513), 'former EC users' (n = 2,078), and 'never EC users' (n = 31,313), were 3.9% (n = 98), 2.2% (n = 46) and 1.7% (n = 530), respectively. Comparing 'current EC' users with 'never EC' users, the unadjusted OR for asthma was 2.36 (95% CI: 1.89-2.94). In order to control for the effect of conventional cigarette (CC) smoking, after stratifying the subjects by the three CC smoking categories (never CC, former CC, and current CC), within the 'never CC' category, the unadjusted OR for asthma for 'current EC' users was 3.41 (95% CI: 1.79-6.49), and the adjusted OR was 2.74 (95% CI: 1.30-5.78). Severe asthma was reflected by the number of days absent from school due to asthma symptoms; current EC users had the highest adjusted OR for severe asthma compared to 'never EC' users. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to a reference population of high school students in South Korea, EC users have an increased association with asthma and are more likely to have had days absent from school due to severe asthma symptoms. In conclusion, the results indicate that EC use may be a risk factor for asthma. The results may be useful in developing a scientific basis for the evaluation of a potential health hazard by EC.


Subject(s)
Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/etiology , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/adverse effects , Schools/statistics & numerical data , Students/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Asthma/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
8.
Ind Health ; 48(1): 18-28, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20160404

ABSTRACT

The Risk Level Based Management System (RLBMS) is an occupational risk management (ORM) model that focuses occupational safety, hygiene, and health (OSHH) resources on the highest risk procedures at work. This article demonstrates the model's simplicity through an implementation within a heavily regulated research institution. The model utilizes control banding strategies with a stratification of four risk levels (RLs) for many commonly performed maintenance and support activities, characterizing risk consistently for comparable tasks. RLBMS creates an auditable tracking of activities, maximizes OSHH professional field time, and standardizes documentation and control commensurate to a given task's RL. Validation of RLs and their exposure control effectiveness is collected in a traditional quantitative collection regime for regulatory auditing. However, qualitative risk assessment methods are also used within this validation process. Participatory approaches are used throughout the RLBMS process. Workers are involved in all phases of building, maintaining, and improving this model. This worker participation also improves the implementation of established controls.


Subject(s)
Government Regulation , Models, Organizational , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Assessment/organization & administration , Safety Management/methods , Guideline Adherence , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Safety Management/organization & administration , United States
9.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 52(6): 419-28, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18632731

ABSTRACT

Control banding (CB) strategies offer simplified solutions for controlling worker exposures to constituents that are found in the workplace in the absence of firm toxicological and exposure data. These strategies may be particularly useful in nanotechnology applications, considering the overwhelming level of uncertainty over what nanomaterials and nanotechnologies present as potential work-related health risks, what about these materials might lead to adverse toxicological activity, how risk related to these might be assessed and how to manage these issues in the absence of this information. This study introduces a pilot CB tool or 'CB Nanotool' that was developed specifically for characterizing the health aspects of working with engineered nanoparticles and determining the level of risk and associated controls for five ongoing nanotechnology-related operations being conducted at two Department of Energy research laboratories. Based on the application of the CB Nanotool, four of the five operations evaluated in this study were found to have implemented controls consistent with what was recommended by the CB Nanotool, with one operation even exceeding the required controls for that activity. The one remaining operation was determined to require an upgrade in controls. By developing this dynamic CB Nanotool within the realm of the scientific information available, this application of CB appears to be a useful approach for assessing the risk of nanomaterial operations, providing recommendations for appropriate engineering controls and facilitating the allocation of resources to the activities that most need them.


Subject(s)
Nanoparticles/toxicity , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Inhalation Exposure/prevention & control , Nanotechnology , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Particle Size , Pilot Projects , Risk Assessment/methods
10.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 48(1): 3-11, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14718340

ABSTRACT

This paper describes two sets of experiments that were intended to characterize the orientation-averaged aspiration efficiencies of IOM samplers mounted on rotating bluff bodies. IOM samplers were mounted on simplified, three-dimensional rectangular bluff bodies that were rotated horizontally at a constant rate. Orientation-averaged aspiration efficiencies (A360) were measured as a function of Stokes' number (St), velocity ratio (R) and dimension ratio (r). Aspiration efficiency (A) is the efficiency with which particles are transported from the ambient air into the body of a sampler, and A360 is A averaged over all orientations to the wind. St is a dimensionless variable that represents particle inertia, R is the ratio of the air velocity in the freestream and that at the plane of the sampler's entry orifice, and r is the ratio of the sampler's orifice diameter and the bluff body's width. The first set of experiments were instrumental in establishing a hierarchy of effects on orientation-averaged A. It was clear that compared to r, St had a much larger influence on A. It was also clear, however, that the effects of St were overpowered by the effects of R in many cases. As concluded in previous studies, R and St were considered the most important factors in determining A, even for A360. The second set of experiments investigated A360 of IOM samplers for a much wider range of r than examined in previous research. Two important observations were made from the experimental results. One was that the A360 of IOM samplers, as a function of St, did not change for an r-range of 0.066-0.4. This meant that an IOM sampler mounted on a near life-size mannequin would measure the same aerosol concentration as one not mounted on anything. The second observation was that the aspiration efficiency curve of the IOM sampler was close to the inhalability curve. This gave further evidence that the bluff body did not play a major role in influencing A360, as the IOM samplers, in these experiments, were either mounted on miniature bluff bodies or on nothing at all. These observations all suggest that it is quite possible to design and test personal samplers with desired sampling characteristics using protocols that do not require full-size mannequins, which greatly simplifies the development of new samplers.


Subject(s)
Aerosols/analysis , Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Air Movements , Analysis of Variance , Equipment Design , Humans , Manikins , Particle Size , Reproducibility of Results
11.
J Environ Monit ; 4(5): 633-41, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12400907

ABSTRACT

An understanding of the scaling laws governing aerosol sampler performance leads to new options for testing aerosol samplers at small scale in a small laboratory wind tunnel. Two methods are described in this paper. The first involves an extension of what is referred to as the "conventional" approach, in which scaled aerosol sampler systems are tested in a small wind tunnel while exposed to relatively monodisperse aerosols. Such aerosols are collected by test and reference samplers respectively and assessed gravimetrically. The new studies were carried out for a modified, low flowrate version of the IOM personal inhalable aerosol sampler. It was shown that such experiments can be carried out with a very high level of repeatability, and this supported the general validity of the aerosol sampler scaling laws. The second method involves a novel testing system and protocol for evaluating the performances of aerosol samplers. Here, scaled aerosol samplers of interest are exposed to polydisperse aerosols, again in a small wind tunnel. In this instance, the sampled particles are counted and sized using a direct-reading aerodynamic particle sizer (the APS). A prototype automated aerosol sampler testing system based on this approach was built and evaluated in preliminary experiments to determine the performance of another modified version of the IOM personal inhalable aerosol sampler. The design of the new test system accounts for the complex fluid mechanical coupling that occurs near the sampler inlet involving the transition between the external flow outside the sampler and the internal airflow inside the sampler, leading in turn to uncontrolled particle losses. The problem was overcome by the insertion of porous plastic foam plugs. where the penetration characteristics are well understood, into the entries of both the test and the reference samplers. Preliminary experiments with this new system also supported the general validity of the aerosol sampler scaling laws. In addition, they demonstrated high potential that this approach may be applied in a standardised aerosol testing method and protocol.


Subject(s)
Aerosols/analysis , Air Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Exposure , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Air Movements , Humans , Particle Size , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va) ; 63(6): 698-702, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12570076

ABSTRACT

In the gravimetric assessment of workplace aerosols, there is an increasing need to confidently measure smaller and smaller collected masses. To do this, it is important to know both the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of the analysis performed, determined by the weighing imprecision of blank samples. Of particular current interest is the measurement of inhalable aerosols, as defined for many substances in the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists threshold limit values list. One popular method is the use of a filter contained within a small cassette, in which both are weighed. Earlier investigations of plastic and stainless steel cassettes showed that plastic cassettes are highly sensitive to changes in humidity. But one study also demonstrated that the resulting changes in mass could be largely corrected using field blanks. An investigation, therefore, was undertaken to determine the weighing imprecision of various cassette and filter assemblies, assuming blank corrections are made. Three types of filter (Teflon, glass fiber, and polyvinyl chloride) were investigated in combination with three types of cassette (plastic, nickel-plated plastic, and stainless steel). Results show that regardless of the substrate being used, sample masses equal to or higher than 0.19 and 0.65 mg can be confidently detected and quantified, respectively.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Filtration/methods , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Filtration/instrumentation , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Threshold Limit Values , United States , Workplace
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...