ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The hamstring muscles play a crucial role in sprint running, but are also highly susceptible to strain injuries, particularly within the biceps femoris long head (BFlh). This study compared the adaptations in muscle size and strength of the knee flexors, as well as BFlh muscle and aponeurosis size, after two eccentrically focused knee flexion training regimes: Nordic hamstring training (NHT) or lengthened state eccentric training (LSET, isoinertial weight-stack resistance in an accentuated hip-flexed position), to habitual activity (no training controls: CON). METHODS: 42 healthy young males completed 34 sessions of NHT or LSET over 12 weeks or served as CON (n = 14/group). MRI-measured muscle volume of seven individual knee flexors and BFlh aponeurosis area, and maximum knee flexion torque during eccentric, concentric and isometric contractions were assessed pre- and post-training. RESULTS: LSET induced greater increases in hamstrings (+18% vs +11%) and BFlh (+19% vs +5%) muscle volumes and BFlh aponeurosis area (+9% vs +3%) than NHT (all P ≤ 0.001), with no changes after CON. There were distinctly different patterns of hypertrophy between the two training regimes, largely due to the functional role of the muscles; LSET was more effective for increasing the size of knee flexors that also extend the hip (2.2-fold vs NHT), whereas NHT increased the size of knee flexors that do not extend the hip (1.9-fold vs LSET; both P ≤ 0.001). Changes in maximum eccentric torque differed only between LSET and CON (+17% vs +4%; P = 0.009), with NHT (+11%) in-between. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that LSET is superior to NHT in inducing overall hamstrings and BFlh hypertrophy, potentially contributing to better sprint performance improvements and protection against hamstring strain injuries than NHT.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to establish how well a three-parameter sigmoid exponential function, DIFACT, follows experimentally obtained voluntary neural activation-angular velocity profiles and how robust it is to perturbed levels of maximal activation. Six male volunteers (age 26.3±2.73 years) were tested before and after an 8-session, 3-week training protocol. Torque-angular velocity (T-ω) and experimental voluntary neural drive-angular velocity (%VA-ω) datasets, obtained via the interpolated twitch technique, were determined from pre- and post-training testing sessions. Non-linear regression fits of the product of DIFACT and a Hill type tetanic torque function and of the DIFACT function only were performed on the pre- and post-training T-ω and %VA-ω datasets for three different values of the DIFACT upper bound, αmax, 100%, 95% & 90%. The determination coefficients, R(2), and the RMS of the fits were compared using a two way mixed ANOVA and results showed that there was no significant difference (p<0.05) due to changing αmax values indicating the DIFACT remains robust to changes in maximal activation. Mean R(2) values of 0.95 and 0.96 for pre- and post-training sessions show that the maximal voluntary torque function successfully reproduces the T-ω raw dataset.
