Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 44(5): 461-466, sept.-oct. 2016. graf, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-155860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic enterocolitis, also known as food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES), is an increasingly reported and potentially severe non-IgE mediated food allergy of the first years of life, which is often misdiagnosed due to its non-specific presenting symptoms and lack of diagnostic guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the knowledge of clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic features of FPIES among Italian primary-care paediatricians. METHODS: A 16-question anonymous web-based survey was sent via email to randomly selected primary care paediatricians working in the north of Italy. RESULTS: There were 194 completed surveys (48.5% response rate). Among respondents, 12.4% declared full understanding of FPIES, 49% limited knowledge, 31.4% had simply heard about FPIES and 7.2% had never heard about it. When presented with clinical anecdotes, 54.1% recognised acute FPIES and 12.9% recognised all chronic FPIES, whereas 10.3% misdiagnosed FPIES as allergic proctocolitis or infantile colic. To diagnose FPIES 55.7% declared to need negative skin prick test or specific-IgE to the trigger food, whereas 56.7% considered necessary a confirmatory oral challenge. Epinephrine was considered the mainstay in treating acute FPIES by 25.8% of respondents. Only 59.8% referred out to an allergist for the long-term reintroduction of the culprit food. Overall, 20.1% reported to care children with FPIES in their practice, with cow's milk formula and fish being the most common triggers; the diagnosis was self-made by the participant in 38.5% of these cases and by an allergist in 48.7%. CONCLUSION: There is a need for promoting awareness of FPIES to minimise delay in diagnosis and unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Enterocolitis/complications , Enterocolitis/epidemiology , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Allergy and Immunology/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 44(5): 461-6, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27498217

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic enterocolitis, also known as food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES), is an increasingly reported and potentially severe non-IgE mediated food allergy of the first years of life, which is often misdiagnosed due to its non-specific presenting symptoms and lack of diagnostic guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the knowledge of clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic features of FPIES among Italian primary-care paediatricians. METHODS: A 16-question anonymous web-based survey was sent via email to randomly selected primary care paediatricians working in the north of Italy. RESULTS: There were 194 completed surveys (48.5% response rate). Among respondents, 12.4% declared full understanding of FPIES, 49% limited knowledge, 31.4% had simply heard about FPIES and 7.2% had never heard about it. When presented with clinical anecdotes, 54.1% recognised acute FPIES and 12.9% recognised all chronic FPIES, whereas 10.3% misdiagnosed FPIES as allergic proctocolitis or infantile colic. To diagnose FPIES 55.7% declared to need negative skin prick test or specific-IgE to the trigger food, whereas 56.7% considered necessary a confirmatory oral challenge. Epinephrine was considered the mainstay in treating acute FPIES by 25.8% of respondents. Only 59.8% referred out to an allergist for the long-term reintroduction of the culprit food. Overall, 20.1% reported to care children with FPIES in their practice, with cow's milk formula and fish being the most common triggers; the diagnosis was self-made by the participant in 38.5% of these cases and by an allergist in 48.7%. CONCLUSION: There is a need for promoting awareness of FPIES to minimise delay in diagnosis and unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Enterocolitis/epidemiology , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Enterocolitis/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Humans , Internet , Italy/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 41(5): 131-5, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20101925

ABSTRACT

Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) is considered the most easily available clinical test to indirectly assess the level of eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma, and to predict the efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). It is possible to measure the level of exhaled NO using online or offline methods. The most widely used online method employs techniques that enable NO in exhaled air to be measured in a single exhalation, calculating the value at the end-expiratory plateau. Because of the correlation between the level of exhaled NO with the level of eosinophilic inflammation in the airway of asthmatic patients, it has been proposed as a clinical marker in the practice of respiratory and allergy physicians with differing targets. In particular it is considered to be highly effective in the diagnosis of allergic asthma, to be capable of identifying those patients with a higher response probability to inhaled corticosteroids, and to a lesser extent, to be of value in contributing to the management of the disease. The possibility of easily taking measurements of FeNO in an office setting even by relatively young children, and the availability of a portable device, opens a significant perspective for the routine use of FeNO evaluation in daily practice.


Subject(s)
Asthma/diagnosis , Biomarkers/analysis , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Nitric Oxide/analysis , Respiratory System/metabolism , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/pathology , Asthma/physiopathology , Eosinophils/pathology , Exhalation , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prognosis , Respiratory System/pathology
6.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res ; 3(5): 349-55, 1983.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6678828

ABSTRACT

Cefoperazone is a third-generation semisynthetic injectable cephalosporin. It has been reported that cefoperazone has beta-lactamase resistance and quite a broad antimicrobial spectrum against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms and most anaerobes. In this study, the pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone were examined in a group of 10 patients suffering from acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, with purulent or mucopurulent expectorations. Cefoperazone was administered at the dose of 1 g i.m. every 12 hours. Serum and urinary parameters and the profile of bronchial mucus diffusion were assessed after the first administration and during the whole period of treatment which lasted for 7 days. In a second, third, and fourth group of volunteer patients who had to undergo surgical operations, bone, lung and prostatic penetration of cefoperazone was determined in correlation with serum levels.


Subject(s)
Bone and Bones/metabolism , Bronchitis/metabolism , Cefoperazone/metabolism , Lung/metabolism , Prostate/metabolism , Sputum/analysis , Bronchitis/drug therapy , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Kinetics , Male
7.
Clin Ther ; 5(1): 69-78, 1982.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6290066

ABSTRACT

Cefotaxime is a new powerful methoxycephalosporin with a broad anti-microbial spectrum, suitable for parenteral administration. In the present study, the concentrations of cefotaxime in serum and in bronchial secretion were determined after intramuscular injection of 1 gm every eight hours for seven days. Subjects were patients suffering from an exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Serum levels versus time curve were interpreted in terms of a one-compartment open model. Pharmacokinetic parameters after single and multiple doses were investigated. No evidence of significant accumulation was found. Furthermore, a type of in vivo rate of killing with cefotaxime was investigated by evaluating the decrease in the number of colonies in bronchial mucus cultures daily for seven days. In two groups of volunteers who had to undergo surgery, bone and prostatic concentrations of cefotaxime were determined and correlated with serum levels.


Subject(s)
Bone and Bones/metabolism , Cefotaxime/metabolism , Prostate/metabolism , Sputum/metabolism , Bronchi/metabolism , Half-Life , Humans , Kinetics , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...