Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prev Med Rep ; 38: 102621, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38375182

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Toxic substances can trigger headaches. The prevalence of pesticide use and headaches was high among the population of Rafsanjan. Methods: A cross-sectional study was used to collect data from 9991 adults who participated via sampling people aged 35-70 years old of both genders from the Rafsanjan Cohort Study (RCS) in Iran. Demographic characteristics, habits, chronic primary headache (CPH), and episodic primary headache (EPH) were measured. Results: The prevalence of CPH and EPH were 7.4 % and 29.9 % respectively. The multivariable model showed the odds of EPH increased significantly by the pesticide exposure on farm OR: 1.16 (1.02-1.34), in yard OR: 1.18 (1.01-1.39), duration of pesticide exposure in yard > median OR: 1.35 (1.06-1.73), at home OR: 1.31 (1.17-1.46), duration of pesticide exposure at home ≤ median OR: 1.24 (1.10-1.40) and > median OR: 1.38 (1.22-1.57). Also, pesticide preparation OR: 1.20 (1.03-1.39), duration of exposure in pesticide preparation ≤ median OR: 1.31 (1.09-1.57), and duration of exposure in managed spraying pesticide > median OR: 1.28 (1.04-1.57) increased odds of EPH. These results showed that the odds of CPH increased in participants using pesticides at home OR: 1.22 (1.02-1.48), duration of pesticide exposure at home > median OR: 1.37 (1.11-1.70), and duration of pesticide exposure in pesticide preparation > median OR: 0.47 (0.27-0.82). The odds of EPH increased with more pesticide exposures (18 %) and duration of pesticide exposure (25 %). Conclusions: As evidenced by the obtained results, there is a relationship between pesticide exposure and headaches.

2.
Adv Biomed Res ; 1: 7, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23210066

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty as to whether addition of magnesium sulfate to spinal local anesthetics improves quality and duration of block in the caesarean section. In this randomized double blind clinical trial study, we investigated the effect of adding different doses of intrathecal magnesium sulfate to bupivacaine in the caesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional approval and obtaining informed patient consent, 132 ASA physical status I-II women undergoing elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia were randomized to four groups: 1 - 2.5 cc Bupivacaine 0.5%+ 0.2 cc normal saline (group C) 2 - 2.5 cc Bupivacaine 0.5%+ 0.1 cc normal saline+ 0.1 cc magnesium sulfate 50% (group M(50)) 3- 2.5 cc Bupivacaine 0.5%+ 0.05 cc normal saline+ 0.15 cc magnesium sulfate 50% (group M(75)) 4- 2.5 cc Bupivacaine 0.5%+ 0.2 cc magnesium sulfate 50% (group M(100)). Patients and staff involved in data collections were unaware of the patient group assignment. We recorded the following: onset and duration of block, time to complete motor block recovery, and analgesic requirement. RESULTS: Magnesium sulfate caused a delay in the onset of both sensory and motor blockade. The duration of sensory and motor block were longer in M(75) and M(100) groups than group C (P < 0.001). Recovery time was shorter in group C (P < 0.001) and analgesic requirement was more in group C than others (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing the caesarean section under hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia, the addition of 50, 75, or 100 mg magnesium sulfate provides safe and effective anesthesia, but 75 mg of this drug was enough to lead a significant delay in the onset of both sensory and motor blockade, and prolonged the duration of sensory and motor blockade, without increasing major side effects.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...