Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(5): JC51, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33939485

ABSTRACT

SOURCE CITATION: Cheng HY, McGuinness LA, Elbers RG, et al. Treatment interventions to maintain abstinence from alcohol in primary care: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;371:m3934. 33239318.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Deterrents , Alcoholism , Acamprosate/therapeutic use , Adult , Alcohol Deterrents/therapeutic use , Alcoholism/drug therapy , Alcoholism/prevention & control , Ethanol , Humans , Taurine/therapeutic use
3.
J Opioid Manag ; 9(1): 35-41, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23709302

ABSTRACT

AIM/BACKGROUND: Tramadol is a synthetic opiate and a centrally acting weak m-opioid receptor agonist. The potential advantages of tramadol include ease of administration, low abuse potential, and being nonscheduled. This study compared tramadol and buprenorphine for controlling withdrawal symptoms in patients with opioid dependence syndrome. METHODS: Consenting male subjects between 20 and 45 years of age who fulfilled the ICD-10-DCR criteria for opiate dependence syndrome were randomly assigned in a double-blind, double-dummy placebo-controlled trial for detoxification. Those with multiple drug dependence, abnormal cardiac, renal and hepatic functions, psychosis, or organic mental illness were excluded. Assessments included Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS), Objective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (OOWS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Side Effect Check List. Subjects were evaluated daily and study duration was 10 days. RESULTS: Sixty two subjects were enrolled. The mean SOWS and OOWS and VAS were significantly lower in the buprenorphine group on second and third day of detoxification as compared to the tramadol group. Although the retention rate was higher for buprenorphine group throughout the study, when compared with tramadol the difference was not significant on any day. Three subjects in the tramadol group had seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Tramadol was found to have limited detoxification efficacy in moderate to severe opioid withdrawal and substantial risk of seizures as compared to buprenorphine. Further studies are warranted to examine its efficacy in mild opioid withdrawal symptoms and its potential use in outpatient settings where its administration advantages may be valuable.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Heroin Dependence/rehabilitation , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/rehabilitation , Tramadol/therapeutic use , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Buprenorphine/adverse effects , Checklist , Chi-Square Distribution , Double-Blind Method , Heroin Dependence/diagnosis , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Opiate Substitution Treatment/adverse effects , Pain Measurement , Pilot Projects , Severity of Illness Index , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Tramadol/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Addiction ; 107(5): 957-66, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22126102

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a brief intervention (BI) for illicit drugs (cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants and opioids) linked to the World Health Organization (WHO) Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). The ASSIST screens for problem or risky use of 10 psychoactive substances, producing a score for each substance that falls into either a low-, moderate- or high-risk category. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled trial in which participants were either assigned to a 3-month waiting-list control condition or received brief motivational counselling lasting an average of 13.8 minutes for the drug receiving the highest ASSIST score. SETTING: Primary health-care settings in four countries: Australia, Brazil, India and the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 731 males and females scoring within the moderate-risk range of the ASSIST for cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants or opioids. MEASUREMENTS: ASSIST-specific substance involvement scores for cannabis, stimulants or opioids and ASSIST total illicit substance involvement score at baseline and 3 months post-randomization. FINDINGS: Omnibus analyses indicated that those receiving the BI had significantly reduced scores for all measures, compared with control participants. Country-specific analyses showed that, with the exception of the site in the United States, BI participants had significantly lower ASSIST total illicit substance involvement scores at follow-up compared with the control participants. The sites in India and Brazil demonstrated a very strong brief intervention effect for cannabis scores (P < 0.005 for both sites), as did the sites in Australia (P < 0.005) and Brazil (P < 0.01) for stimulant scores and the Indian site for opioid scores (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test-linked brief intervention aimed at reducing illicit substance use and related risks is effective, at least in the short term, and the effect generalizes across countries.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking , Counseling/methods , Illicit Drugs , Psychotherapy, Brief/methods , Smoking , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Cocaine-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Male , Marijuana Abuse/rehabilitation , Middle Aged , Motivation , Opioid-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Prospective Studies , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
6.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 6(8): 944-950.e3, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18585976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with carcinoma of the gallbladder (GBC) and obstructive jaundice are usually not amenable to curative resection. Effective palliation by biliary decompression is the goal of treatment. Endoscopic stenting (ES) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) can provide biliary decompression. We compared unilateral PTBD and ES in patients with a hilar block caused by GBC and assessed their quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Consecutive patients with GBC not suitable for curative resection with Bismuth type 2 or 3 block were randomized to either PTBD or ES with a 10F plastic stent. Technical success, successful drainage, early cholangitis, complications, procedure-related mortality, 30-day mortality, survival, and QOL before and 1 and 3 months after stenting were compared between the 2 groups. All patients were followed up until death. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were randomized to PTBD or ES (27 each). Successful drainage was better in the PTBD group (89% vs 41%; P < .001). Early cholangitis was significantly higher in the ES group (48% vs 11%; P = .002). Procedure-related (4% vs 8%) and 30-day mortality (4% vs 8%) and median survival were similar (60 days in both; P = .71). Although the World Health Organization-Quality of Life 1- and 3-month physical and psychological scores were better after PTBD, the difference was not significant. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 global health status at 3 months was significantly better after PTBD (75 vs 30.5, P = .02). The EORTC symptom scores improved in both groups, but only fatigue was significantly better after PTBD. CONCLUSIONS: PTBD provides better biliary drainage and has lower complication rates in patients with GBC and hilar block.


Subject(s)
Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/methods , Drainage/methods , Endoscopy/methods , Gallbladder Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Drainage/adverse effects , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Survival Analysis
7.
Addiction ; 103(6): 1039-47, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18373724

ABSTRACT

AIM: The concurrent, construct and discriminative validity of the World Health Organization's Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) were examined in a multi-site international study. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand and 47 participants, recruited from drug treatment (n = 350) and primary health care (PHC) settings (n = 697), were administered a battery of instruments. MEASUREMENTS: Measures included the ASSIST; the Addiction Severity Index-Lite (ASI-Lite); the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS); the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI-Plus); the Rating of Injection Site Condition (RISC); the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST); the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT); the Revised Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (RTQ); and the Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP). FINDINGS: Concurrent validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between ASSIST scores and scores from the ASI-Lite (r = 0.76-0.88), SDS (r = 0.59), AUDIT (r = 0.82) and RTQ (r = 0.78); and significantly greater ASSIST scores for those with MINI-Plus diagnoses of abuse or dependence (P < 0.001). Construct validity was established by significant correlations between ASSIST scores and measures of risk factors for the development of drug and alcohol problems (r = 0.48-0.76). Discriminative validity was established by the capacity of the ASSIST to discriminate between substance use, abuse and dependence. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to establish cut-off scores with suitable specificities (50-96%) and sensitivities (54-97%) for most substances. CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrated that the ASSIST is a valid screening test for identifying psychoactive substance use in individuals who use a number of substances and have varying degrees of substance use.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Adult , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychometrics , Severity of Illness Index , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , World Health Organization
8.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 55(3): 105-12, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17447508

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review short- and long-term outcomes following total correction in patients with tetralogy of Fallot that presented during adulthood. METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis of 284 patients (aged 14-50 years, mean 19.4 +/- 2.5 years) with tetralogy of Fallot who underwent total correction at our institution between January 1991 and December 2001. Thirty patients were subjected to postoperative first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography scans. A Hindi version of the standard World Health Organization quality of life proforma was mailed to 120 patients operated on during the first half of the study period. RESULTS: Altogether, 45 (15.8%) patients had palliative shunts, and 32 (11%) had preoperative coil embolization. The transatrial/transpulmonary artery approach was used in 62 (22%) patients, the transventricular approach in 86 (30%) patients, and a combined approach in 136 (48%) patients. A transannular pericardial patch was used in 200 (70%) patients. A total of 61 (21%) patients had nonfatal complications. There were 28 hospital deaths. Follow-up ranged from 1 month to 10 years (mean 4.6 +/- 2.3 years). There were 7 (2.5%) late deaths and 6 (2.1%) reoperations. Altogether, 94% of patients were in New Yk Heart Association (NYHA) class I. Radionuclide angiocardiography showed normal right ventricular and left ventricular function in 18 (60%) and 22 (73%) patients, respectively. All of the 66 respondents perceived an improved quality of life. The actuarial survival and freedom from reoperation at 10 years were 82.88% +/- 3.80% and 92.82% +/- 3.40%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Total correction in this subset of patients offers the best option for long-term symptom-free survival.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Tetralogy of Fallot/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Radionuclide Imaging , Reoperation , Research Design , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stroke Volume , Tetralogy of Fallot/diagnostic imaging , Tetralogy of Fallot/epidemiology , Tetralogy of Fallot/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Indian J Med Sci ; 60(1): 3-12, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16444082

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of Human Deficiency Virus (HIV)/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) on the quality of life (QOL) on such patients in North India. DESIGN: A cross sectional study. SETTING: Outpatient setting and wards, Department of Medicine at a premier tertiary health care center, North India. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight consecutive HIV/AIDS patients attending Medicine out patient department and/or admitted to the wards of All India Institute of Medical Sciences were administered a structured questionnaire by the HIV nurse coordinator. QOL was evaluated using the WHOQOL-Bref (Hindi) instrument. ANALYSIS: One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to find out significant difference between the clinical categories and socio-demographic variables on QOL domains. RESULTS: The overall QOL mean score on a scale of 0-100 was found to be 25.8. Similarly, on the scale of 0-100 the mean scores in the four domains of QOL in descending order were social (80.9); psychological (27.5); physical (17.7) and environmental domain (11.65). There was a significant difference of quality of life in the physical domain between asymptomatic patients (14.6) and patients with AIDS (10.43) defining illnesses (p< 0.001) and asymptomatic and early symptomatic (12) patients (p=0.014). QOL in the psychological domain was significantly poorer in early symptomatic (12.1) (p< 0.05) and AIDS patients (12.4) (p< 0.006) as compared to asymptomatic individuals (14.2). A significant difference in QOL scores in the psychological domain was observed with respect to the educational status (p< 0.037) and income of patients (p< 0.048). Significantly better QOL scores in the physical (p< 0.040) and environmental domain (p< 0.017) were present with respect to the occupation of the patients. Patients with family support had better QOL scores in environmental domain. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, QOL is associated with education, income, occupation, family support and clinical categories of the patients.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/epidemiology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , HIV Infections/psychology , Health Status , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires , World Health Organization
10.
Indian J Cancer ; 42(3): 125-32, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16276012

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Survival has not improved significantly in spite of newer therapies. In view of the high-symptom burden and severe morbidity, evaluation of quality of life (QOL) becomes important in these patients. Several instruments are now available for this purpose, and have demonstrated good correlation with performance status, symptoms, and survival. Quality of life assessments also help in comparing different therapeutic regimes, thus allowing selection of the appropriate modality. Problems of inconsistent interpretability and high-patient dropout rate poses a challenging problem that needs to be tackled. In spite of these drawbacks, QOL is now considered to be an essential component of lung cancer management and should be performed routinely. Such a practice will help the physician plan appropriate treatment strategies and set practical therapeutic goals.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Quality of Life , Sickness Impact Profile , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/physiopathology , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Qual Life Res ; 14(8): 1953-8, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16155783

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF STUDY: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multisystem disease with various extra-articular manifestations (EAMs). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) issues are assuming increasing importance in chronic rheumatic diseases like RA. No data on QOL in RA is available from the Indian subcontinent. There is also a paucity of literature on the impact of EAMs on HRQOL in RA. The objective of this study was to address these lacunae. METHODS: The study group comprised 81 patients with RA from a rheumatology clinic in India. Quality of life was estimated by the generic HRQOL measure: World Health Organization quality of life instrument (WHOQOL-Bref). Disease activity in RA was measured by calculating Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28). RESULTS: The mean HRQOL scores of the patients were 12.0+/-2.8, 13.2+/-2.7, 14.4+/-2.9 and 13.3+/-2.6 in the physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains of the WHOQOL-Bref respectively. Age, gender, disease duration, educational status, constitutional symptoms, rheumatoid factor positivity, erosions and deformities did not influence HRQOL. Disease activity had a negative influence on the physical and psychological domains. Patients with EAMs had significantly higher DAS28 scores compared to patients without EAMs. Even after adjustment for disease activity, patients with EAMs had lower HRQOL scores than patients without these features (statistically significant for physical domain). CONCLUSIONS: The physical domain of HRQOL is most affected in Indian patients with RA. Increasing disease activity and presence of EAMs worsens the quality of life.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 13(9): 615-9, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15362084

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the adverse consequences of recently introduced higher strength (0.4 and 2.0 mg per tablet) buprenorphine in Indian market. Buprenorphine, a partial opiate agonist and antagonist, is an emerging alternative to methadone as an agent for long-term treatment of opiate dependence. METHODS: The current investigation was conducted through a multi-centric post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study using a structured performa from patients receiving buprenorphine as routine therapy from de-addiction centres. Evaluation included subjective and objective assessments and recording of adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 5551 observations from ten centres, common subjective symptoms were generalised weakness (48.9%), sense of high (euphoria) (44.5%), muscle aches (39.5%) and relief from pain (37.2%). About 5% observations recorded systolic hypertension. Among 55 subjects where laboratory tests were conducted, 12 showed raised levels of AST ad 9 had elevated ALT. Twelve adverse events reported included seizure, epistaxis, panic attacks, constipation and dyspnoea. Significant relation was seen between duration of use and time since last dose, and total number of subjective symptoms reported. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the adverse effects could be understood as either effects related to intoxication or withdrawal from agonists.


Subject(s)
Buprenorphine/adverse effects , Narcotic Antagonists/adverse effects , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Receptors, Opioid/agonists , Administration, Sublingual , Adult , Buprenorphine/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Nausea/chemically induced , Sleep Stages/drug effects , Substance-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Tablets , Vomiting/chemically induced
13.
J Psychiatry Neurosci ; 28(6): 415-29, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14631454

ABSTRACT

We present an overview of current progress and future directions in the molecular genetics of schizophrenia. We review linkage studies, involving the genome-wide scan of chromosomes with closely spaced polymorphic markers, and association studies of candidate genes, identified on the basis of receptors, neurotransmitters and response to certain drugs. The limitations of the research methodology involved in analyzing such a complex disorder are discussed, as are methods to strengthen this methodology with newer statistical and technological advances to give results that are replicable, statistically significant and applicable to a wider population. A greater understanding of the genetic mechanisms and the application of pharmacogenetics would lead to improvements in therapeutic interventions.


Subject(s)
Molecular Biology/methods , Schizophrenia/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6/genetics , Genetic Markers , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genome, Human , Humans , Linkage Disequilibrium/genetics , Point Mutation/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic/genetics , Receptors, Dopamine D1/genetics , Receptors, Dopamine D5 , Receptors, GABA/genetics , Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/genetics , Receptors, Serotonin/genetics , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Trinucleotide Repeats/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...