Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr ; 202: 38-43.e1, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30195557

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between nutrition delivery practices and energy and protein intake during the transition from parenteral to enteral nutrition in infants of very low birth weight (VLBW). STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of 115 infants who were VLBW from a regional neonatal intensive care unit. Changes in energy and protein intake were estimated during transition phase 1 (0% enteral); phase 2 (>0, ≤33.3% enteral); phase 3 (>33.3, ≤66.7% enteral); phase 4 (>66.7, <100% enteral); and phase 5 (100% enteral). Associations between energy and protein intake were determined for each phase for parenteral nutrition, intravenous lipids, central line, feeding fortification, fluid restriction, and excess non-nutritive fluid intake. RESULTS: In phases 2 and 3, infants receiving feeding fortification received less protein than infants who were unfortified (-1.1 and -0.3 g/kg/d, respectively; P < .001). However, this negative association was not observed after adjusting for relevant nutrition delivery practices. Despite greater enteral protein intake during phases 2 and 3 (0.3 and 0.8 g/kg/d, respectively; P < .001), infants with early fortification received less parenteral protein than infants who were unfortified (-1.4 and -1.1 g/kg/d, respectively; P < .001). Similar patterns were observed for energy intake. Protein intake declined during phases 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Infants paradoxically received less protein and energy on days with early fortification, suggesting that clinicians may lack easily accessible data to detect the association between nutrition delivery practices and overall nutrition in infants who are VLBW.


Subject(s)
Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Energy Intake , Enteral Nutrition , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , Parenteral Nutrition , Female , Food, Fortified , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Pediatr ; 167(2): 384-9, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26001313

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI) in children. STUDY DESIGN: A nested case-control study was performed to identify RCDI risk factors using a pediatric cohort of inpatients and outpatients diagnosed with Clostridium difficile infection by tcdB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at an academic children's hospital between December 9, 2012, and June 30, 2014. Strict inclusion criteria were adopted to limit selection bias related to inappropriate inclusion of patients with probable C difficile colonization. RESULTS: Thirty children with RCDI were compared with 94 children with non-RCDI. Statistically significant associations were identified between RCDI and malignancy (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.0-7.4, P = .044), tracheostomy tube dependence (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.1-24.7, P = .037), and tcdB PCR cycle threshold (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97, P = .01) using multivariable logistic regression modeling. The receiver operator characteristic curve for PCR cycle threshold as a predictor of RCDI demonstrated area under the curve = 0.67. The highest predictive rate (75%) for RCDI was demonstrated at cycle threshold cutpoint ≤ 20. The difference between sensitivity (64%) and specificity (68%) was minimized at cycle threshold cutpoint ≤ 23. Compared with controls with non-RCDI, children excluded because of probable C difficile colonization had a similar cycle threshold value (27.5 vs 27.2, P = .77). CONCLUSIONS: Malignancy and tracheostomy tube dependence were identified as RCDI risk factors. Although RCDI was associated with positivity at a lower tcdB PCR cycle threshold, the clinical utility of cycle threshold as a tool to predict recurrence was limited. Better methods to predict RCDI are needed to prioritize pediatric populations to target for RCDI prevention efforts.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium Infections/etiology , Adolescent , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Tracheostomy , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL