Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
1.
Vaccine ; 35(36): 4681-4686, 2017 08 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28754488

ABSTRACT

There is no global monitoring system for influenza vaccination coverage, making it difficult to assess progress towards the 2003 World Health Assembly (WHA) vaccination coverage target. In 2008, the IFPMA Influenza Vaccine Supply International Task Force (IVS) developed a survey method to assess the global distribution of influenza vaccine doses as a proxy for vaccination coverage rates. The latest dose distribution data for 2014 and 2015 was used to update previous analyses. Data were confidentially collected and aggregated by the IFPMA Secretariat, and combined with previous IFPMA IVS survey data (2004-2013). Data were available from 201 countries over the 2004-2015 period. A "hurdle" rate was defined as the number of doses required to reach 15.9% of the population in 2008. Overall, the number of distributed doses progressively increased between 2004 and 2011, driven by a 150% increase in AMRO, then plateaued. One percent fewer doses were distributed in 2015 than in 2011. Twenty-three countries were above the hurdle rate in 2015, compared to 15 in 2004, but distribution was highly uneven in and across all WHO regions. Three WHO regions (AMRO, EURO and WPRO) accounted for about 95% of doses distributed. But in EURO and WPRO, distribution rates in 2015 were only marginally higher than in 2004, and in EURO there was an overall downward trend in dose distribution. The vast majority of countries cannot meet the 2003WHA coverage targets and are inadequately prepared for a global influenza pandemic. With only 5% of influenza vaccine doses being distributed to 50% of the world's population, there is urgency to redress the gross inequities in disease prevention and in pandemic preparedness. The 2003WHA resolution must be reviewed and revised and a call issued for the renewed commitment of Member States to influenza vaccination coverage targets.


Subject(s)
Global Health , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Health Surveys , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Seasons , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/trends
2.
Vaccine ; 35(33): 4167-4176, 2017 07 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28655451

ABSTRACT

B lineage mismatch prompted introduction of quadri-valent influenza vaccines (QIV) with two influenza B viruses representing distinct antigenic lineages. To explore the impact on antibody induction and vaccine effectiveness predicted from antibody (VEab), we performed a systematic literature search on immunogenicity studies conducted to assess antibody superiority of QIV over trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV). Thirteen relevant articles described 31 trials from 2007 and 2013. Log-transformed GMT trial estimates and their variances were converted to clinical protection rates predicted from antibody (PRab). VEab estimates were calculated from pre- and post-vaccination PRab. Without specific pre-vaccination immunity, average VEab was 69% for match, and -4% for lineage mismatch. With increasing pre-vaccination seropositivity, mismatch impact declined to 2%. We also performed an umbrella literature search for randomised controlled trials and test-negative case-control trials with TIV, and estimated vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed influenza B (VEf). Sixty-eight eligible clinical articles described 110 season-trials from 1965 to 2012, covering seasons with B lineage match (n=52), lineage drift (n=15) and lineage mismatch (n=43). With no pre-vaccination antibody levels determined, we used chance of previous exposure to influenza B (Ppe) as pre-seasonal immunity measure. When Ppe was 0%, average VEf for matched seasons was 67%, and for mismatched seasons 35%, indicating a moderate, yet significant mismatch impact on VEf. With increasing Ppe, mismatch impact declined to 3%. Thus serological and field trials indicate that B lineage mismatch impact is negatively related to pre-seasonal immunity and that the gain of QIV over TIV most benefits infants and children not yet exposed to influenza B.


Subject(s)
Influenza B virus/classification , Influenza B virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/virology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
3.
Science ; 346(6212): 996-1000, 2014 Nov 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25414313

ABSTRACT

We introduce the antibody landscape, a method for the quantitative analysis of antibody-mediated immunity to antigenically variable pathogens, achieved by accounting for antigenic variation among pathogen strains. We generated antibody landscapes to study immune profiles covering 43 years of influenza A/H3N2 virus evolution for 69 individuals monitored for infection over 6 years and for 225 individuals pre- and postvaccination. Upon infection and vaccination, titers increased broadly, including previously encountered viruses far beyond the extent of cross-reactivity observed after a primary infection. We explored implications for vaccination and found that the use of an antigenically advanced virus had the dual benefit of inducing antibodies against both advanced and previous antigenic clusters. These results indicate that preemptive vaccine updates may improve influenza vaccine efficacy in previously exposed individuals.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Vaccination , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antigenic Variation/genetics , Antigenic Variation/immunology , Evolution, Molecular , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/genetics , Influenza, Human/blood , Influenza, Human/prevention & control
4.
Vaccine ; 29(34): 5785-92, 2011 Aug 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21624411

ABSTRACT

Several inactivated influenza vaccine formulations for systemic administration in man are currently available for annual (seasonal) immunization: split virus and subunit (either plain-aqueous, or virosomal, or adjuvanted by MF59). From a literature search covering the period 1978-2009, 33 articles could be identified, which described randomized clinical trials comparing at least two of the four vaccine formulations with respect to serum hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody response, local and systemic vaccine reactions and serious adverse events after vaccination, and employing seasonal vaccine components and doses. In total, 9121 vaccinees of all ages, either healthy or with underlying diseases, were involved. Most vaccinees were primed or had been vaccinated in previous years. For immunogenicity, homologous post-vaccination geometric mean HI titers (GMTs) were analyzed by a random effects model for continuous data. Unreported standard deviations (SD) were addressed by imputing assumed SD-values. Age and health state of the vaccinees appeared to have little influence on the outcome. The immunogenicity of split, aqueous and virosomal subunit formulations were similar, with geometric mean ratio values (GMR, quotient of paired GMT-values) varying around one (0.93-1.24). The MF59-adjuvanted subunit vaccine induced, on average, larger antibody titers than the non-adjuvanted vaccine formulations, but the absolute increase was small (GMR-values varying between 1.25 and 1.40). Vaccine reactions were analyzed using a random effects model for binary data. Local and systemic reactogenicity was similar among non-adjuvanted formulations. The adjuvanted subunit formulation was more frequently associated with local reactions than the non-adjuvanted formulations (rate ratio: 2.12, significant). Systemic reactions were similar among all vaccine formulations. The original articles emphasized the mild and transient character of the vaccine reactions and the absence of serious vaccine-related adverse events. This adequate amount of evidence led to the conclusion that all the currently available inactivated influenza vaccine formulations are safe, well tolerated and similarly effective to control seasonal influenza outbreaks across primed populations and age ranges.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Influenza Vaccines , Vaccines, Inactivated , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology
5.
Vaccine ; 27(18): 2414-7, 2009 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19368782

ABSTRACT

Between 1982 and 2006, 76 clinical studies (including the annual update studies required for licensing in Europe) were performed with the trivalent inactivated subunit influenza vaccine Influvac. In all, 6415 subjects were vaccinated, of whom 5034 were eligible for safety evaluation and 4534 for efficacy evaluation. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 13.7% of subjects. Transient mild-to-moderate local and systemic reactions occurred in up to half of subjects. Post-marketing surveillance confirmed the well-established safety profile reported for inactivated influenza vaccines. All three serological criteria for immunogenicity of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) were met for all three virus strain (sub)types in healthy adults, elderly (over 60 years), nursing home residents, and those at high risk of influenza-related complications. In an additional trial in children aged 3 -- 12 years, all three CHMP criteria for adults were met for all three virus strains. Influvac is thus immunogenic and safe, and is a suitable vaccine to combat the annually recurring medical and economic burden of influenza epidemics.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Humans , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/adverse effects , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology
6.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 68(6): 873-8, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18625625

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) is a systemic vasculitis characterised by relapsing and remitting disease activity. Immunosuppressive drugs are used to control disease, but increase susceptibility to infection. Therefore, influenza vaccination should be considered in WG patients. This study was performed to assess the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in WG patients. METHODS: A randomised, controlled trial was performed in WG patients with quiescent disease, defined as a Birmingham vasculitis activity score (BVAS) less than 2. Patients were randomly assigned to receive influenza vaccination (n = 49) or to participate as controls (n = 23). In addition, healthy controls (n = 49) were vaccinated. At entry and at 1 and 3-4 months after entry, antibody responses to vaccination were determined. Furthermore, disease activity was measured (BVAS), adverse effects were recorded and antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA) titres were determined. RESULTS: WG patients achieved high seroprotection rates to all three influenza strains, comparable with healthy controls. Only the A/H1N1 strain patients had a lower seroconversion rate (p = 0.002) and geometric mean titre (p = 0.037) than controls. After 1 month, one control and one vaccinated WG patient had developed active disease. At 3-4 months, two additional control patients had developed active disease compared with none of the vaccinated patients (p = 0.099). Vaccination did not influence ANCA titres. Adverse effects did not differ between patients and healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination in WG patients with quiescent disease induced a sufficient antibody response. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR1130.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic/blood , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/drug therapy , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vasculitis/immunology
9.
Vaccine ; 24(44-46): 6629-31, 2006 Nov 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16901593

ABSTRACT

Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. There are two influenza vaccines available for elderly subjects: Fluad (Chiron) and Invivac (Solvay Pharmaceuticals). The present clinical study was a randomized, endpoint-blind, parallel group study in elderly subjects aged 61 years and older to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of these vaccines as compared to a standard influenza vaccine Invivac (Solvay Pharmaceuticals). The three vaccines had similar immunogenicity results, whereas the tolerability profile of Invivac was better as compared to Fluad.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/pharmacology , Drug Delivery Systems , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Virosome/administration & dosage , Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/standards , Safety , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/adverse effects , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology , Vaccines, Virosome/adverse effects , Vaccines, Virosome/immunology
10.
Vaccine ; 23 Suppl 1: S39-49, 2005 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16005120

ABSTRACT

Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and the fact that currently available vaccines are generally less effective in elderly than in younger subjects. Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. A novel antigen-presenting strategy to overcome impaired immune responses is the use of virosomes. Previously, data on safety and reactogenicity have been published regarding the use of virosomal influenza vaccines. Data from three recent clinical trials are presented here. The first of these was a comparative study of a virosomal vaccine and a conventional subunit vaccine in "at-risk" adults with underlying chronic illness. The virosomal vaccine demonstrated comparable tolerability to the subunit vaccine, with about 98% of patients reporting tolerability to be good or very good. The vast majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity. With both vaccine types, mean HI titres decreased with age for both the A-H1N1 and B influenza virus strains, but for the A-H3N2 strain (the most virulent of the three strains), mean HI titres did not decrease with age, suggesting a better response with the virosomal vaccine when compared to the subunit vaccine. All three studies explored the long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with virosomal influenza vaccines. Immunogenicity declined over time but remained high at 4, 6 and 12 months post-vaccination compared to baseline, indicating that adequate seroprotection is achievable for the duration of the influenza season. Virosomal vaccines may induce better immunity in elderly subjects and may be more effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in this age group.


Subject(s)
Drug Delivery Systems , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Virosome/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Vaccination , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/adverse effects , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology , Vaccines, Virosome/adverse effects , Vaccines, Virosome/immunology
11.
Virus Res ; 103(1-2): 125-32, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15163500

ABSTRACT

Serological parameters intend to describe antibody response to influenza vaccine in a population. However, there is uncertainty about the mathematical appropriateness and the biological or clinical meaning of conventionally used parameters. Theoretical considerations and exploration of a data-set of 16 studies with an inactivated (subunit) influenza vaccine involving 1176 adult subjects suggest the following conclusions. In a population seronegative before vaccination, the post-vaccination geometric mean titre (post-GMT) is a meaningful immunological parameter adequately expressing antibody response after vaccination. The related protection rate (PR) is a good surrogate parameter for protection provided by a given vaccine, thus relevant to public health. However, in a population partially seropositive before vaccination (due to previous exposition to influenza antigens), the same parameters may, under certain conditions, seriously overestimate the antibody response, as they do not account for the pre-vaccination state. Conventional attempts to address pre-vaccination antibody are associated with either loss of information (exclusion of seropositive subjects) or incomplete control of pre-vaccination state (mean fold increase (MFI), response rate (RR)). Although not devoid of theoretical limitations (heteroscedasticity), correction of post-GMT and PR by linear regression appears to provide better estimates of antibody response and vaccine immunogenicity.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Adult , Humans , Immunization , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/immunology , Influenza, Human/virology , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage
12.
Virus Res ; 103(1-2): 139-45, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15163502

ABSTRACT

In 14 clinical studies, various efficacy and safety aspects of a new virosomal influenza vaccine (Invivac) were assessed in 2865 subjects. The virosomal influenza vaccine fully complies with the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) requirement for immunogenicity of influenza vaccines. In particular, in a subset of subjects with low pre-vaccination titers (thus those persons who actually need protection by a vaccine), between 76 and 99% of subjects (dependent on age, health status and vaccine components) achieved protective hemagglutination inhibiting (HI) antibody titers after vaccination with the virosomal influenza vaccine. Acceptable frequencies of well-known local and systemic reactions were observed in healthy adults and risk subjects in clinical studies and in a post-marketing study population. These reactions were transient and generally not severe, and did not cause major inconvenience. In conclusion, Invivac is an efficacious and safe vaccine for the protection against influenza in healthy and chronically ill adult subjects. The vaccine is especially efficacious in subjects with low pre-vaccination immunity.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccines, Virosome , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Vaccination , Vaccines, Virosome/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Virosome/adverse effects , Vaccines, Virosome/immunology
13.
Vaccine ; 21(21-22): 2743-6, 2003 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12798612

ABSTRACT

We have investigated whether 'at risk' subjects who did not respond serologically during a pre-study vaccination with a commercial egg grown influenza sub-unit vaccine would respond to a subsequent vaccination with either a single dose of MDCK cell grown influenza vaccine or a standard egg grown influenza vaccine containing the same virus strains. We studied 48 non-responder subjects with a mean age 67.5, range: 34-82 years. In this non-responder group the increased immune response that was detected after boosting with an MDCK cell derived vaccine response was variable and relatively modest, except for the A/Texas strain in the vaccine. The proportion of subjects, with an HI titre of >/=40 (protective antibody titre) increased from 50 to 83% (A/Texas strain), from 13 to 25% (B/Harbin strain) and from 38 to 46% (A/Wuhan strain). In comparison a booster vaccination with egg-derived influenza vaccine resulted in an increase immune response with an HI antibody titre >/=40 for two of the three strains, namely from 17 to 58% for the B/Harbin strain and from 8 to 33% for the A/Wuhan strain.


Subject(s)
Immunization, Secondary , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Cell Line , Chick Embryo , Dogs , Female , Humans , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza B virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Injections, Intramuscular , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination
14.
Vaccine ; 21(16): 1780-5, 2003 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12686094

ABSTRACT

Influenza vaccination is becoming an increasingly important aspect of public health programs in developed and rapidly developing countries. In 2000, most of these countries had national recommendations to vaccinate elderly people and those with high-risk conditions. Levels of vaccine use, however, varied widely and several rapidly developing countries had higher levels than those seen in many developed countries. More than one-third of all influenza vaccinations occurred in countries outside North America, western Europe and Australia and New Zealand. With increasing vaccine use, all countries will be better prepared for the next pandemic. Nonetheless, those countries that use but do not produce influenza vaccine will find it difficult to obtain supplies of pandemic vaccine.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Developed Countries , Developing Countries
15.
Dev Biol (Basel) ; 115: 63-73, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15088777

ABSTRACT

The results of the haemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibody test for influenza virus antibody in human sera closely match those produced by virus neutralization assays and are predictive of protection. On the basis of the data derived from 12 publications concerning healthy adults, we estimated the median HI titre protecting 50% of the vaccinees against the virus concerned at 28. This finding supports the current policy requiring vaccines to induce serum HI titres of > or = 40 to the vaccine viruses in the majority of the vaccinees. Unfortunately similar studies are scanty for the elderly, the group most at risk of influenza. There still remain many unsolved technical problems with the HI assay and we recommend that these problems be studied and the virus neutralization test as a predictor of resistance to influenza be assessed. Although the studies on this issue often give conflicting results, they generally show that HI antibody responses to influenza vaccination tend to diminish with increasing age, when health is often compromized. Advanced age in itself seems not to be an independent factor in this process. However, even in completely healthy elderly individuals the response to vaccination with an antigenically new virus may be strongly reduced compared with younger vaccinees.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/immunology , Influenza A virus/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Humans , Influenza Vaccines , Neutralization Tests
16.
Vaccine ; 20(9-10): 1340-53, 2002 Jan 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11818152

ABSTRACT

Since the 1940s, influenza vaccines are inactivated and purified virus or virus subunit preparations (IIV) administered by the intramuscular route. Since decades, attempts have been made to construct, as an alternative, attenuated live influenza vaccines (LIV) for intranasal administration. Presently, the most successful LIV is derived from the cold-adapted master strains A/Ann Arbor/6/60 (H2N2) and B/Ann Arbor/1/66 (AA-LIV, for Ann-Arbor-derived live influenza vaccine). It has been claimed that AA-LIV is more efficacious than IIV. In order to assess differences between the two vaccines with respect to systemic reactogenicity, antibody response, and efficacy, we performed a meta-analysis on eighteen randomised comparative clinical trials involving a total of 5000 vaccinees of all ages. Pooled odds ratios (AA-LIV versus IIV) were calculated according to the random effects model. The two vaccines were associated with similarly low frequencies of systemic vaccine reactions (pooled odds ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.24). AA-LIV induced significantly lower levels of serum haemagglutination inhibiting antibody and significantly greater levels of local IgA antibody (influenza virus-specific respiratory IgA assayed by ELISA in nasal wash specimens) than IIV. Yet, although they predominantly stimulate different antibody compartments, the two vaccines were similarly efficacious in preventing culture-positive influenza illness. In all trials assessing clinical efficacy, the odds ratios were not significantly different from one (point of equivalence). The pooled odds ratio for influenza A-H3N2 was 1.50 (95% CI: 0.80-2.82), and for A-H1N1, 1.03 (95% CI: 0.58-1.82). The choice between the two vaccine types should be based on weighing the advantage of the attractive non-invasive mode of administration of AA-LIV, against serious concerns about the biological risks inherent to large-scale use of infectious influenza virus, in particular the hazard of gene reassortment with non-human influenza virus strains.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Adaptation, Physiological , Administration, Intranasal , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Child , Child, Preschool , Cold Temperature , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Infant , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Injections, Intramuscular , Middle Aged , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology
17.
Vaccine ; 19(20-22): 2898-907, 2001 Apr 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11282201

ABSTRACT

Local mucosal IgA antibodies play a central role in protection of the respiratory tract against influenza virus infection. Therefore, new-generation influenza vaccines should aim at stimulating not only systemic, but also local antibody responses. Previously, we demonstrated that the recombinant B subunit of the Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin (LTB) is a potent adjuvant towards nasally administered influenza subunit antigen. Here, we investigated the protection conferred by LTB-supplemented influenza subunit antigen given intranasally (i.n.) or intramuscularly (i.m.) to mice. Both i.n. and i.m. immunization with subunit antigen and LTB completely protected the animals against viral infection. Protection upon i.n. immunization was associated with the induction of antigen-specific serum IgG and mucosal IgA, whereas protection upon i.m. immunization correlated with strong serum and mucosal IgG, but not IgA responses. We conclude that LTB-supplemented influenza subunit antigen, given either i.n. or i.m, induces protective antibody-mediated mucosal immunity and thus represents a promising novel flu vaccine candidate.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Bacterial Toxins/administration & dosage , Enterotoxins/administration & dosage , Escherichia coli Proteins , Immunoglobulin A, Secretory/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Administration, Intranasal , Animals , Female , Immunization , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Injections, Intramuscular , Lung/virology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Nasal Mucosa/virology , Protein Subunits , Rats
18.
J Med Virol ; 61(1): 94-9, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10745239

ABSTRACT

The success of influenza vaccination depends largely on the antigenic match between the influenza vaccine strains and the virus strains actually circulating during the season. In the past, this match has proved to be satisfactory in most seasons. In the 1997/1998 season, however, hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays with ferret antisera indicated a considerable mismatch between the H3N2 vaccine component and the most prevalent epidemic influenza A(H3N2) virus. The results from antigenic analyses using pre- and postvaccination serum samples from volunteers of various ages, including residents of nursing homes who were more than 60 years of age, were in good agreement with the results obtained with ferret antisera. Homologous serum antibody responses to the H3N2 vaccine component as well as the cross-reactivity of the induced antibodies to the epidemic H3N2 strain, declined with increasing age of the vaccinees. As a consequence of these two effects, 84% of the vaccinees over 75 years of age did not develop HI antibody titers >/= 40 against the major H3N2 virus variant of 1997/1998, suggesting that they were not protected against infection with this virus variant. These findings support the current policy of the World Health Organization (WHO), which is to base worldwide influenza virus surveillance on results predominantly obtained by antigenic analyses of influenza virus isolates with ferret antisera in HI tests. If an antigenic mismatch is observed, the protective efficacy of the vaccine, especially for the elderly, may be insufficient. The observations also support the current policy to include the elderly in serologic efficacy trials.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Antibody Formation , Ferrets , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/blood , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/immunology , Humans , Influenza A virus/classification , Influenza, Human/blood , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Vaccination
19.
Dev Biol Stand ; 98: 77-87; discussion 89-90, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10494961

ABSTRACT

The replacement of embryonated chicken eggs by tissue culture cells for the production of influenza vaccines is likely to take place in the near future. Vaccines have already been produced in Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells (Brands et al, in this issue) and extensively tested in phase III trials in humans (Palache et al, in this issue) and it seems a matter of time before such vaccines will become available. For this reason, the generation of high-growth reassortants of influenza A virus strains in MDCK cells has been examined. Influenza A virus reassortants of the field strains A/Taiwan/1/86, A/Johannesburg/82/96 and A/Shenzhen/227/95 (all H1N1) were generated in serum-free cultured MDCK-SF1 cells by dual infection with A/Hong Kong/2/68 (H3N2), a strain selected for its high-growth phenotype. These reassortant viruses all contained at least the matrix gene of A/Hong Kong/2/68 which apparently correlates with an improvement of the viral yield.


Subject(s)
Influenza A virus/genetics , Recombination, Genetic , Animals , Cell Line , Culture Media, Serum-Free , Dogs , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/immunology , Influenza A virus/growth & development , Influenza A virus/immunology , Neuraminidase/genetics , Neuraminidase/immunology , Viral Plaque Assay , Virus Cultivation
20.
Dev Biol Stand ; 98: 93-100; discussion 111, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10494962

ABSTRACT

Influenza vaccine production technology based on large scale cell culture technology has been developed. From the characterization of the continuous cell line MDCK as well as drug safety studies we conclude that this cell line and the cell culture system are suitable for biological production. The Down Stream Process (DSP) of the virus-containing harvest fluids guarantees sufficient inactivation of influenza viruses and adequate removal or inactivation of putative adventitious or endogenous viruses, mycoplasma or bacteria. Our data indicate that the tissue culture-based production technology is feasible.


Subject(s)
Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/immunology , Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza B virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Virus Cultivation , Animals , Cell Line/virology , Consumer Product Safety , Dogs , Humans , Influenza B virus/growth & development , Mice
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...