Improving Care at Emergency Department Discharge for Pediatric Patients with Anaphylaxis Using a Quality Improvement Framework.

Introduction: Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal systemic reaction that requires prompt recognition and targeted treatment. Despite international consensus and national guidelines, there is often incomplete care for pediatric patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of anaphylaxis. Our institution experienced wide variability in discharge planning for patients with anaphylaxis. The goal of our study was to improve care at ED discharge for pediatric patients with anaphylaxis using a quality improvement framework. The specific aims were to increase the frequency of patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis who receive an anaphylaxis action plan at ED discharge from 0% to 60% and to increase referrals to an allergy clinic from a baseline of 61%-80% between October 2020 and April 2021. Methods: Targeted interventions included revisions to the electronic health record system, forging interdisciplinary partnerships and emphasizing provider education. Outcome measures were the proportion of patients receiving an anaphylaxis action plan and an allergy clinic follow-up. The balancing measure was the ED length of stay. Results: The study showed an increase in anaphylaxis action plans from 0% to 34%. Allergy clinic referral rates improved from 61% to 82% within the same period. The average length of stay of 347 minutes remained unchanged. Conclusions: Revising the discharge instructions to include an anaphylaxis action plan and reinforcing provider behaviors with educational interventions led to an overall improvement in discharge care for patients with anaphylaxis. Future work will focus on electronic health record changes to continue progress in additional clinical settings.

Decreasing Blood Culture Contaminants in a Pediatric Emergency Department: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: High peripheral blood culture contamination rates (BCCR) in the emergency department (ED) contribute to overuse and harm. This study describes 2 years of quality improvement (QI) interventions that aimed to decrease a high BCCR in a pediatric ED. METHODS: The QI team created a Key Driver Diagram with multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. PDSA interventions included a venipuncture sterility checklist (PDSA1), phlebotomist feedback system (PDSA2), and physician ordering guidelines (PDSA3). The specific aim was to decrease the BCCR by 50% within 24 months. The secondary aim was to decrease the peripheral blood culture ordering rate (BCOR) by 10% within 24 months. The balancing measure was the proportion of pathogenic bacteremia cases at ED return visits before and after PDSA3 implementation. A financial measure estimated the savings in charges between the observed and expected contaminants in PDSA3. An interrupted time series design applied statistical process control methodology to detect special cause variations. RESULTS: The BCCR in the baseline, PDSA1, PDSA2, and PDSA3 periods were 3.02%, 2.30%, 1.58%, and 1.17%, respectively. The BCOR in the baseline, PDSA1, PDSA2, and PDSA3 periods was 4.80%, 4.26%, 3.82%, and 3.49%, respectively. Special cause variations occurred after PDSA cycle implementations for both BCCR and BCOR. There was no change in the balancing measure. The interventions were associated with an annual prevention of 95 contaminants and savings of $300,070. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that focused on improving venipuncture technique and limiting unnecessary blood cultures were associated with fewer contaminants and the achievement of the QI team's project aims.