Associations, follow up data, and postnatal outcome of antenatally diagnosed Urinary Tract Dilatation - Five-year single tertiary center experience from South India.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract dilatations (UTD) are frequently diagnosed during Mid-Trimester Anomaly Scan (MTAS), at which time, given their variable progression and heterogeneous classification systems, offering suitable counsel to the couple is challenging. OBJECTIVE: Based on postnatal data, we aimed to guide parental counseling, and further evaluation of UTD diagnosed at MTAS. Specifically, the utility of multi-disciplinary UTD classification system was tested. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of all UTDs included from five years (2015-2020) MTAS register. The multi-disciplinary UTD classification system was used for antenatal/postnatal UTD categorization. Follow-up data were obtained from case records until the current age of children (2-6 years). RESULTS: Out of 527 fetal abnormalities, 103 had UTD at MTAS. Based on the third-trimester ultrasound, 49 were low-risk UTD A1, and 44 were increased-risk UTD A2-3 (including the nineteen UTD A1 at MTAS worsened to A2-3 by third-trimester). On postnatal follow-up of UTD A1 and A2-3, respectively, neonatal UTD P2/P3 was seen in 2% and 40.9%; complete spontaneous resolution was seen in 79.5% and 43.18%; none and 22.7% underwent surgical intervention; persistent P2/P3 UTD were seen on follow-up in 2% and 4.5% (excluding those who needed surgery); impaired renal function was seen in none and 36.3%, and recurrent UTI in 8.1% and 34.09%. The subgroup with progressive UTD (from A1 to A2-3 by third-trimester ultrasound) formed 43% of the final UTD A2-3 category. Among these 19 cases, surgical intervention was performed in eight (42%); impaired renal function was seen in 7 cases (36.8%), and recurrent UTI was seen in eight (42%). DISCUSSION: Given the diverse classification systems for UTD, ours is the second Indian data proving the prognostic utility of multi-disciplinary UTD classification system, specifically at third trimester scan, based on postnatal outcome. In contrast to published guidelines, our data suggests follow-up for renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter (APD) of 4-7 mm at MTAS, as some may worsen. Similar progression has been noted in other Indian studies, but the classification systems are different. Contrary to the published literature, we could not suggest a renal APD cut-off as a single criterion to predict surgical intervention. Significant limitations are retrospective observational design and multiple sonographers. CONCLUSION: Our data helps guide parental counseling and further evaluation for UTD diagnosed at MTAS. The multi-disciplinary Consensus UTD Classification system, was helpful in prognostication.

We Need to Improve Prenatal Screening Practices in Primary Obstetric Care: A Representative Data from a Fetal Medicine Unit in Coastal Karnataka.

BACKGROUND: The present observational data from the fetal medicine unit aim to identify gaps in prenatal screening modalities employed in the primary obstetric care population in coastal Karnataka. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of all referrals to Fetal Medicine unit is over 2 years. For each fetal abnormality, we reviewed the literature to note the range of gestational age at which the abnormality should almost always be diagnosed. Taking this as standard, the gestational age at which each of these problems was diagnosed and referred was noted down. They were compared and analysed to understand the efficiency of prenatal screening practices in the referral population. The final perinatal outcome was also noted down in order to assess the impact on perinatal mortality/morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 277 cases were referred to fetal medicine unit. Two hundred twenty-eight cases (82.31%) were low risk pregnancies. Among 277 cases, 200 (72.2%) had structural abnormalities, 7 (2.5%) chromosomal/ genetic abnormalities, 61 (22.02%) isolated soft markers, and 9 (3.2%) twin-related problems. Detection rate of structural abnormalities was 33% at 14 weeks and 52.22% at 20 weeks, considering those anomalies usually diagnosed by these gestational age windows. The primary reason for delayed diagnosis was non-performance of ultrasound "on time", rather than missed diagnosis. Fifty-three per cent (106 out of 200) of all the fetal structural abnormalities were diagnosed beyond 20 weeks. Average gestational age at mid-trimester anomaly scan in this group was between 20 and 24 weeks. Sixty-one patients were referred due to isolated soft markers, 30 beyond 20 weeks. Eighty per cent of them did not have any aneuploidy screening in pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Practice of fetal medicine hugely depends upon appropriate prenatal screening practices in the referral population. There is an urgent need to bring in standard protocols for Prenatal Screening across all the primary obstetric care providers, both in the public and private sectors. Considering the huge burden of delayed prenatal diagnosis in our country, the proposed revision of MTP bill is a welcome change in fast-growing field of fetal diagnosis and therapy.