Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Physiol Behav ; 143: 151-7, 2015 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25728243

ABSTRACT

Tail biting in pigs is a major welfare problem within the swine industry. Even though there is plenty of information on housing and management-related risk factors, the biological bases of this behavioral problem are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible link between tail biting, based on behavioral recordings of pigs during an ongoing outbreak, and certain neurotransmitters in different brain regions of these pigs. We used a total of 33 pigs at a farm with a long-standing problem of tail biting. Three equally big behavioral phenotypic groups, balanced for gender and age were selected, the data thus consisting of 11 trios of pigs. Two of the pigs in each trio originated from the same pen: one tail biter (TB) and one tail biting victim (V). A control (C) pig was selected from a pen without significant tail biting in the same farm room. We found an effect of tail biting behavioral phenotype on the metabolism of serotonin and dopamine, with a tendency for a higher 5-HIAA level in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of TB compared to the other groups, while V pigs showed changes in both serotonin and dopamine metabolism in the striatum (ST) and limbic cortex (LC). Trp:BCAA and Trp:LNAA correlated positively with serotonin and 5-HIAA in the PFC, but only in TB pigs. Furthermore, in both ST and LC, several of the neurotransmitters and their metabolites correlated positively with the frequency of bites received by the pig. This is the first study indicating a link between brain neurotransmission and tail biting behavior in pigs with TB pigs showing a tendency for increased PFC serotonin metabolism and V pigs showing several changes in central dopamine and serotonin metabolism in their ST and LC, possibly due to the acute stress caused by being bitten.


Subject(s)
Biogenic Monoamines/metabolism , Bites and Stings/pathology , Bites and Stings/veterinary , Brain/metabolism , Central Nervous System/metabolism , Amino Acids/blood , Animals , Bites and Stings/blood , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Female , Male , Statistics as Topic , Swine
2.
Arch Anim Nutr ; 64(3): 238-53, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20578651

ABSTRACT

Digesta viscosity, ileal transit time of digesta, apparent ileal protein digestibility and apparent metabolisable energy (AME(N)) of diets based on wheat and dehulled barley (WB), oats (O) or a mixture of these (WBO) fed as such or with enzyme supplementation in three- and six-week old turkeys and broilers were investigated. In addition, differences between ileal digestibility and AME(N) calculated by using titanium dioxide (TiO2), chromic oxide (Cr2O3) or acid insoluble ash (AIA) as indigestible markers were compared. Digesta viscosities were generally moderate reaching from 2.5 mPa x s to 7.3 mPa x s. The highest viscosities were observed in WBO diets. Viscosities were reduced with age in broilers, and were generally higher in turkeys than in broilers, especially at six weeks of age. Digesta retention time in ileum was elongated with age of the birds, pronouncedly in broilers. Oat inclusion to the diets decreased retention time especially in broilers at six weeks of age. Apparent ileal digestibility of protein ranged from 0.64-0.83, was lower at six weeks of age than at three weeks of age and generally lowest in O diets, especially in turkeys. AME(N) of the diets ranged from 11.2-13.4 MJ/kg being higher at six weeks of age than at three weeks of age. AME(N) of Diets O was the lowest but AME(N) of WBO diets was higher than that of WB diets indicating a synergistic interaction of cereals, this trend being more pronounced in broilers. Enzyme supplementation decreased viscosity and improved AME(N) in most diets, but did not affect ileal protein digestibility. Differences between ileal digestibility estimates obtained with TiO2 or Cr2O3 were small and mainly not significantly different from 0. AME(N) estimates were generally higher when calculated with Cr2O3 than with TiO2. AIA gave remarkably lower AME(N) values than TiO2 (the significant differences ranging from 0.24-0.94 MJ/kg). In addition, effects of markers on AME(N) estimates interacted with age of the birds and dietary treatments.


Subject(s)
Chickens/physiology , Digestion , Edible Grain/metabolism , Energy Metabolism , Gastrointestinal Contents/chemistry , Turkeys/physiology , Aging , Animal Feed/analysis , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Biomarkers , Diet/veterinary , Female , Gastrointestinal Transit , Male , Viscosity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...