Long-term extracorporeal photochemotherapy in a pediatric patient with refractory sclerodermatous chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Sclerodermatous chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children is difficult to treat and life-threatening. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP; photopheresis), an immunomodulatory therapy that involves the infusion of autologous peripheral blood leukocytes after ex vivo exposure to the photoactive agent 8-methoxypsoralen and ultraviolet A radiation, is an effective treatment for steroid-refractory cGVHD. After undergoing allogeneic HSCT for pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a 14-year-old boy developed extensive sclerodermatous cGVHD that was refractory to prednisone, tacrolimus, and sirolimus. ECP was administered over the course of 53 months, during which the skin softened substantially and immunosuppressive therapy was discontinued. This case suggests that long-term ECP is a viable option in children with sclerodermatous cGVHD.

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy for the treatment of refractory Crohn's disease.

Crohn's disease is an idiopathic, relapsing inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. We prospectively evaluated the use of extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP; photopheresis), an immunomodulatory therapy, to treat moderate or severe Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score > or = 220 points) in 2 patients who failed multiple treatments, including immunosuppressants and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. After at least 24 weeks of ECP with stable concomitant therapy, the patient with moderate disease achieved a clinical response (a decrease in CDAI score from baseline of > or = 100 points and an endpoint CDAI score of < or = 150 points), whereas the other patient with severe disease demonstrated limited improvement. ECP was well tolerated in both patients. These observations suggest that adjunctive ECP can be of benefit among patients with active, refractory Crohn's disease of moderate intensity. Further investigation is needed to define the role of ECP in treating Crohn's disease.

Treatment of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease with extracorporeal photochemotherapy.

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP; photopheresis), an immunomodulatory therapy developed for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, has shown promise in treating chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) in uncontrolled studies. The purpose of this study was to further examine the effects of ECP on cGvHD. ECP (administered initially 3 times weekly on alternating days) was retrospectively evaluated in 14 patients with extensive cGvHD following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The median time from transplantation to ECP initiation was 29 months (range, 5-96 months). The median number of concomitant baseline treatments per patient was 3 (range, 0-5). During a median ECP duration of 17 months (range, 3-44 months), 3 patients (21%) achieved a complete cutaneous response (100% improvement), 4 patients (29%) achieved a partial cutaneous response (> or =50% improvement), and 7 patients (50%) had stable skin disease. The median time to response was 6 months (range, 2-15 months), and the median response duration was 5 months (range, 1-31 months). At endpoint, responses were ongoing in 4 patients. Resolution or improvement was noted in arthralgia (5/7 patients), oral changes (3/7), elevated liver enzymes (3/5), dry eyes (2/5), joint stiffness (3/3), pulmonary disease (1/3), and thrombocytopenia (1/1). Because of a favorable response, 11 of 13 patients (85%) who received prednisone at baseline were able to taper (7/13; 54%) or discontinue (4/13; 31%) this medication, and 12 of 14 patients (86%) were able to taper (11/14; 79%) or discontinue (1/14; 7%) ECP. Five-year posttransplantation survival was 77%. Our results suggest that adjunctive ECP improves cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations of cGvHD and has a steroid-sparing effect.

Giant congenital melanocytic nevus with a large ulceration at birth: a 5-year follow-up.

Giant congenital melanocytic nevus (GCMN) is a rare birthmark that places patients at an increased lifetime risk of malignant melanoma. Herein, we describe an unusual case of GCMN that was followed up from birth until 5 years of age. A white girl was born, after an uncomplicated gestation, with a large cutaneous ulceration that extended over her entire back and laterally toward the anterior aspect of her trunk to involve the chest symmetrically. Biopsy specimens from several sites indicated GCMN that was centrally ulcerated. The patient was followed up closely, and the denuded area of skin was allowed to heal by secondary intention. By 19 months of age, the ulceration had healed completely. By 5 years of age, the nevus had lightened significantly and the scar tissue within the nevus had softened. The patient developed normally, meeting all milestones. Clinical and histologic examination did not reveal any signs of malignant transformation. The case we describe here delineates an approach to the long-term management of GCMN complicated by a large ulceration.

Photopheresis. Therapeutic potential in preventing restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Photopheresis (extracorporeal photochemotherapy) is an immunomodulatory therapy that entails the reinfusion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells after exposure to the photoreactive agent methoxsalen and ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation. Currently available at approximately 150 treatment centers worldwide, photopheresis is approved by the US FDA for advanced-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and has also shown promise in treating nonmalignant immune-related conditions such as organ transplant rejection, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, and autoimmune disorders. The precise mechanism by which photopheresis evokes clinical responses is unknown, although this modality seems capable of modulating T-cell and monocyte activity. Clinical and laboratory findings suggest that the reinfusion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells after exposure to UVA-activated methoxsalen engenders an immune response against proliferating T-cell clones. Methoxsalen is a naturally occurring furocoumarin that is biologically inert until exposed to UVA radiation at the proper wavelength, at which time it irreversibly cross-links DNA thymine bases and arrests cell proliferation. T cells isolated from the peripheral blood of patients after photopheresis demonstrate significantly increased levels of apoptosis, whereas macrophages and dendritic cells exhibit the ability to phagocytize the apoptotic T cells. It is surmised that photopheresis enhances the uptake, processing, and presentation of distinctive antigens from apoptotic pathogenic T cells by macrophages and dendritic cells leading to the induction of an anticlonotypic response by cytotoxic T cells. Induction by photopheresis of apparently opposite immune processes (i.e. upregulation of an antitumor response and downregulation of allogeneic or autoimmune responses) can be explained by its ability to target either a single malignant T-cell clone (as in CTCL) or multiple activated T-cell clones (as in organ transplant rejection, graft-versus-host disease, or autoimmune disease). Because acute inflammation and T-cell activation may be important in the pathogenesis of restenosis following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), photopheresis was used for the first time at our center to prevent restenosis. A total of 78 patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease amenable to PTCA with or without stent deployment were enrolled, 41 in the control group and 37 in the photopheresis group. Clinical restenosis occurred in significantly less photopheresis patients than control patients (8 vs 27%; p = 0.04), with a relative risk of 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-1.00). A multicenter clinical trial following a US FDA-recommended protocol is currently underway to better determine what, if any, impact photopheresis has in preventing restenosis.

Dose conversion and titration with a novel, once-daily, OROS osmotic technology, extended-release hydromorphone formulation in the treatment of chronic malignant or nonmalignant pain.

The objective of this open-label, repeated-dose, single-treatment, multicenter study was to evaluate the outcomes associated with a standardized conversion from prior opioid therapy to a novel, once-daily, OROS osmotic technology, extended-release (ER) hydromorphone formulation in an outpatient population with chronic malignant or nonmalignant pain. The study period was divided into 3 phases: the prior opioid stabilization phase (> or =3 days), the conversion and titration phase (3-21 days), and the maintenance phase (14 days). Patients were evaluated at 5 visits during the study period. Analgesic efficacy was measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). At baseline, patients were required to have daily oral morphine equivalent requirements of > or =45 mg. Prior oral or transdermal opioid therapy was converted to single daily doses of ER hydromorphone (8, 16, 32, and 64 mg tablets) at a 5:1 (morphine equivalent to hydromorphone) ratio. Immediate-release (IR) hydromorphone was given as rescue medication for breakthrough pain. Among the 445 patients who enrolled, 404 received the study medication. Of these, 73 (18.1%) had chronic malignant pain and 331 (81.9%) had chronic nonmalignant pain. Dose stabilization (defined as a 3-day period during which the total daily dose of ER hydromorphone remained unchanged and < or =3 doses of IR hydromorphone per day were required) was attained by 73.8% of patients (298/404), of whom 70.1% (209/298) were stabilized with < or =2 titration steps. The mean +/- standard deviation (SD) time to dose stabilization was 12.1 +/- 5.7 days (range of 3 to 33 days). The mean +/- SD final daily dose of ER hydromorphone was 63.4 +/- 129.2 mg. The mean +/- SD final daily dose of IR hydromorphone was 11.5 +/- 36.4 mg, and the mean +/- SD final number of daily doses of IR hydromorphone was 1.7 +/- 1.3. Intent-to-treat and completer analysis demonstrated significant improvements in BPI ratings from prior opioid therapy to the end of ER hydromorphone therapy (P < 0.01 for all pairwise comparisons). Adverse events were consistent with those expected of an opioid agonist in such a patient group, affecting primarily the gastrointestinal and central nervous systems. This uncontrolled study delineates a regimen by which patients with chronic malignant or nonmalignant pain can be readily converted from prior opioid therapy and titrated to an appropriate maintenance dose of ER hydromorphone. Controlled longitudinal studies are required to further evaluate the use of ER hydromorphone in patients with discrete chronic malignant or nonmalignant pain conditions.

Combination hydrocodone and ibuprofen versus combination oxycodone and acetaminophen in the treatment of moderate or severe acute low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Introduced in 1997, the combination of hydrocodone and ibuprofen is the only fixed-dose combination analgesic containing an opioid and ibuprofen that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of combination hydrocodone 7.5 mg and ibuprofen 200 mg (HC/IB) with those of combination oxycodone 5 mg and acetaminophen 325 mg (OX/AC) in the treatment of moderate or severe acute low back pain. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, repeat-dose study lasting up to 8 days. The recommended dosing of the study medications was 1 tablet every 4 to 6 hours, not to exceed 5 tablets per day. If adequate pain relief was not obtained, patients were permitted to take up to 4 doses per day of supplemental analgesic medication-the nonopioid component of the assigned study medication (ibuprofen 200 mg or acetaminophen 325 mg). Measures of efficacy included mean daily pain relief scores (0 = no relief, 1 = slight relief, 2 = moderate relief, 3 = good relief, and 4 = complete relief), mean daily number of tablets and doses of study medication, mean daily number of tablets and doses of supplemental analgesic medication, global evaluation (poor, fair, good, very good, or excellent), and results on the modified 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). All efficacy measures were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. Tolerability was evaluated based on adverse events reported spontaneously or elicited by the in vestigators using nonsuggestive questioning, as well as on the number of patients discontinuing treatment because of adverse events. RESULTS: The study enrolled 147 patients (75 HC/IB, 72 OX/AC). The most common cause of low back pain was muscular/ligamentous injury (97/147; 66.0%), followed by degenerative disk disease (27/147; 18.4%). At baseline, 80 patients (54.4%) reported experiencing moderate pain, and 67 patients (45.6%) reported experiencing severe pain. There were no significant differences between HC/IB and OX/AC with regard to mean ( +/- SD) daily pain relief scores (2.40 +/- 1.06 vs 2.50 +/- 1.01, respectively), mean daily number of tablets of study medication (1.80 +/- 1.70 vs 2.20 +/- 1.60), mean daily number of doses of study medication (1.80 +/- 1.65 vs 2.10 +/- 1.58), mean daily number of tablets of supplemental analgesic medication (0.60 +/- 1.13 vs 0.50 +/- 0.99), mean daily number of doses of supplemental analgesic medication (0.60 +/- 1.07 vs 0.50 +/- 0.90), global evaluations, or mean scores on the modified SF-36. In addition, there were no significant differences in the proportion of patients experiencing adverse events with HC/IB (47; 62.7%) and OX/AC (45; 62.5%). Adverse events were consistent with those generally associated with the component analgesics and predominantly involved the central nervous system and gastrointestinal system. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that HC/IB and OX/AC are similarly effective and tolerable in relieving moderate or severe acute low back pain. Additional controlled longitudinal trials are necessary to evaluate the clinical utility of HC/IB in treating acute low back pain.