Baseline characteristics in the VERIFY study: a randomized trial assessing the durability of glycaemic control with early vildagliptin-metformin combination in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To assess the long-term clinical benefits of early combination treatment with vildagliptin-metformin vs. standard-of-care, metformin monotherapy in the ongoing VERIFY study. METHODS: We randomized 2001 participants with multi-ethnic background, aged 18-70 years, having HbA1c levels 48-58 mmol/mol (6.5-7.5%) and BMI 22-40 kg/m2 . Baseline data included HbA1c , fasting plasma glucose and homeostasis model ß-cell and insulin sensitivity. Standardized meal-tests, insulin secretion rate relative to glucose, and oral glucose insulin sensitivity were assessed in a subpopulation. RESULTS: Out of 4524 screened, data were collected from the 2001 eligible participants (53% women) across Europe (52.4%), Latin America (26.8%), Asia (17.2%), South Africa (3.1%) and Australia (0.5%). The median (interquartile range) disease duration was 3.4 (0.9, 10.2) months; mean (±SD) age 54.3±9.4 years; weight 85.5±17.5 kg and BMI 31.1±4.7 kg/m2 . Baseline HbA1c was 52±3 mmol/mol (6.9±0.3%), fasting plasma glucose 7.5±1.5 mmol/l and the median (interquartile range) of fasting insulin was 109 (75-160) mU/l. Homeostasis model ß-cell and insulin sensitivity values were 84% (60, 116) and 46% (31, 68), respectively. In those undertaking meal-tests, insulin secretion rate relative to glucose was 28±12 pmol/min/m2 /mmol/l and oral glucose insulin sensitivity was 353±57 ml/min/m2 . CONCLUSIONS: Our current, multi-ethnic, newly diagnosed VERIFY population reflects a characteristic presence of early insulin resistance in participants with increased demand for insulin associated with obesity. The VERIFY study will provide unique evidence in characterizing therapeutic intervention in a diverse population with hyperglycaemia, focusing on durability of early glycaemic control.

Diabetes, cardiovascular disease and the microcirculation.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet a significant proportion of the disease burden cannot be accounted for by conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Hypertension occurs in majority of people with T2DM, which is substantially more frequent than would be anticipated based on general population samples. The impact of hypertension is considerably higher in people with diabetes than it is in the general population, suggesting either an increased sensitivity to its effect or a confounding underlying aetiopathogenic mechanism of hypertension associated with CVD within diabetes. In this contribution, we aim to review the changes observed in the vascular tree in people with T2DM compared to the general population, the effects of established anti-diabetes drugs on microvascular outcomes, and explore the hypotheses to account for common causalities of the increased prevalence of CVD and hypertension in people with T2DM.

Differences in glycemic control across world regions: a post-hoc analysis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on dual antidiabetes drug therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This post-hoc analysis of the EDGE (Effectiveness of Diabetes control with vildaGliptin and vildagliptin/mEtformin) study assessed inter-regional differences in baseline characteristics and response to treatment intensification with dual oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with first-line monotherapy were assigned to receive a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, vildagliptin, or comparator OADs as add-on dual therapy. The primary effectiveness end point (PEP) was achieving glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction >0.3% without hypoglycemia, peripheral edema, discontinuation owing to gastrointestinal events or weight gain ⩾5% at 12 months. The secondary effectiveness end point (SEP) was achieving HbA1c of <7% without hypoglycemia or weight gain ⩾3% at 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients (N=43 791), including mean HbA1c (8.2%), varied across regions. Baseline age (62.3 years) and T2DM duration (6.3 years) were greater in patients from Europe than those from India and the Middle East (age: 51.8 and 52.1 years; T2DM duration: 4.3 and 4.2 years, respectively). The probability of achieving PEP with dual therapy was higher in India (odds ratio (OR): 1.5), Latin America (OR: 1.2) and Middle East (OR: 2.0) than in Europe (OR: 0.8) and East Asia (OR: 0.3). Achievement of SEP in patients receiving dual therapy was greater in Latin America (OR: 1.7) and Middle East (OR: 1.7). Vildagliptin add-on therapy allowed more patients to achieve SEP across regions. Women aged ⩾45 years less often attained glycemic target (HbA1c<7%) without significant weight gain ⩾5% compared with women aged <45 years (OR: 0.876, 95% confidence interval: 0.774, 0.992; P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline HbA1c and T2DM duration differed considerably across all regions. Treatment intensification with second OAD, particularly with a DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin, resulted in good treatment response without tolerability issues despite delayed intensification of failing monotherapy across regions.

Effectiveness of vildagliptin versus other oral antidiabetes drugs as add-on to sulphonylurea monotherapy: Post hoc analysis from the EDGE study.

AIM: In this post hoc analysis of the EDGE study, we assessed the effectiveness and safety of vildagliptin versus other oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) as add-on to first-line sulphonylurea (SU) therapy in patients who did not receive metformin in a real-life setting. METHODS: The primary endpoint was odds of achieving an HbA1c reduction of >0.3% without tolerability issues. Secondary endpoint was odds of achieving HbA1c <7.0% without hypoglycaemia or weight gain. Changes in HbA1c, body weight; and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: 2936 patients received vildagliptin and 820 received comparator OADs (any α-GI, TZD, glinide) as add-on to first-line SU therapy. Overall, the mean age, disease duration, HbA1c, and BMI at baseline were 57.1 years, 6.3 years, 8.5%, and 27.7kg/m2, respectively. The odds ratios for achieving primary and secondary endpoints were 1.6 (95% CI: 1.36, 1.86; p<0.0001) and 1.8 (1.45, 2.21; p<0.0001), respectively, in favour of vildagliptin. The between-treatment differences (vildagliptin vs. comparator OAD) for the mean change in HbA1c and body weight were -0.2±0.04% (p<0.0001) and -0.8±0.16kg (p<0.0001), respectively. Overall, the incidence of adverse events was low (vildagliptin, 7% vs. comparator, 8.2%) in both groups. Similar results were observed in a subset of patients enrolled from India and patients who received TZDs as a comparator OAD. CONCLUSION: Under real-life settings, vildagliptin as add-on to SU monotherapy showed better glycaemic response without tolerability issues compared with other OADs.

Time to do more: addressing clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: Clinical inertia, the tendency to maintain current treatment strategies despite results demanding escalation, is thought to substantially contribute to the disconnect between clinical aspirations for patients with diabetes and targets achieved. We wished to explore potential causes of clinical inertia among physicians and people with diabetes. METHODS: A 20-min online survey of 652 adults with diabetes and 337 treating physicians in six countries explored opinions relating to clinical inertia from both perspectives, in order to correlate perceptions and expectations relating to diagnosis, treatment, diabetes complications and therapeutic escalation. RESULTS: Physicians had low expectations for their patients, despite the belief that the importance of good glycaemic control through lifestyle and pharmacological interventions had been adequately conveyed. Conversely, people with diabetes had, at best, a rudimentary understanding of the risks of complications and the importance of good control; indeed, only a small proportion believed lifestyle changes were important and the majority did not intend to comply. CONCLUSIONS: The principal findings of this survey suggest that impairments in communication are at the heart of clinical inertia. This manuscript lays out four key principles that we believe are achievable in all environments and can improve the lives of people with diabetes.

Study to determine the durability of glycaemic control with early treatment with a vildagliptin-metformin combination regimen vs. standard-of-care metformin monotherapy-the VERIFY trial: a randomized double-blind trial.

AIMS: Durability of good glycaemic control (HbA1c ) is of importance as it can be the foundation for delaying diabetic complications. It has been hypothesized that early initiation of treatment with the combination of oral anti-diabetes agents with complementary mechanisms of action can increase the durability of glycaemic control compared with metformin monotherapy followed by a stepwise addition of oral agents. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are good candidates for early use as they are efficacious in combination with metformin, show weight neutrality and a low risk of hypoglycaemia. We aimed to test the hypothesis that early combined treatment of metformin and vildagliptin slows ß-cell deterioration as measured by HbA1c . METHODS: Approximately 2000 people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus who were drug-naive or who were treated with metformin for less than 1 month, and who have HbA1c of 48-58 mmol/mol (6.5-7.5%), will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio in VERIFY, a 5-year multinational, double-blind, parallel-group study designed to compare early initiation of a vildagliptin-metformin combination with standard-of-care initiation of metformin monotherapy, followed by the stepwise addition of vildagliptin when glycaemia deteriorates. Further deterioration will be treated with insulin. The primary analysis for treatment failure will be from a Cox proportional hazard regression model and the durability of glycaemic control will be evaluated by assessing treatment failure rate and the rate of loss in glycaemic control over time as co-primary endpoints. SUMMARY: VERIFY is the first study to investigate the long-term clinical benefits of early combination treatment vs. the standard-of-care metformin monotherapy with a second agent added by threshold criteria.

The effect of oral glucose tolerance test on serum osteocalcin and bone turnover markers in young adults.

Osteocalcin (OC) is an osteoblast-derived protein implicated in the regulation of glucose tolerance and energy metabolism. This endocrine function has been suggested to be exerted via its undercarboxylated form, which has been shown to induce expression of adiponectin, insulin, and islet cell proliferation in mice. Furthermore, insulin has recently been shown to regulate the biological activity of OC in bone. Our aim was to explore the association between glucose and bone metabolism by evaluating the effect of a standard 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on serum OC, carboxylated OC (cOC) and bone-turnover markers (BTMs) C terminal telopeptide (ßCTX-I) and N terminal propeptide (PINP) of type I collagen and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP5b). Serum samples collected at 0 and at 120 min were analyzed in a cohort of normoglycemic young adults (n = 23, mean age 23.6 years). During OGTT a significant decrease was observed in all BTMs (P < 0.001 for all variables). The median decreases from 0 to 120 min for OC, cOC, ßCTX-I, PINP, and TRACP5b were -32.1% (-37.9 to -19.6), -34.4% (-39.8 to -22.2), -61.4% (-68.5 to -53.0), -26.8% (-33.2 to -19.2), and -44.5% (-48.3 to -40.2), respectively. A strong association between the changes in OC and cOC was observed (r = 0.83, P < 0.001). The decrease in PINP was associated with changes in OC, whereas the changes in ßCTX-I and TRACP5b were not associated with decreases in OC or cOC. The observed OGTT-induced changes in bone-derived proteins were partially independent of each other and potentially mediated by different mechanisms.