Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 23(1): 49.e9-49.e14, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27693658

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the incidence of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired pneumonia caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and its association with S. aureus colonization at ICU admission. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of two cohort studies in critically ill patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of microbiologically confirmed S. aureus ICU-acquired pneumonia. Incidences of S. aureus ICU pneumonia and associations with S. aureus colonization at ICU admission were determined using competing risks analyses. In all ICUs, patients were screened for respiratory tract S. aureus carriage on admission as part of infection control policies. Pooling of data was not deemed possible because of heterogeneity in baseline differences in patient population. RESULTS: The two cohort studies contained data of 9156 ICU patients. The average carriage rate of S. aureus among screened patients was 12.7%. In total, 1185 (12.9%) patients developed ICU pneumonia. Incidences of S. aureus ICU pneumonia were 1.33% and 1.08% in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. After accounting for competing events, the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) of S. aureus colonization at admission for developing S. aureus ICU pneumonia was 9.55 (95% CI 5.31-17.18) in cohort 1 and 14.54 (95% CI 7.24-29.21) in cohort 2. CONCLUSION: The overall cumulative incidence of S. aureus ICU pneumonia in these ICUs was low. Patients colonized with S. aureus at ICU admission had an up to 15 times increased risk for developing this outcome compared with non-colonized patients.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/microbiology , Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia, Staphylococcal/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Carrier State , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
2.
Neth J Med ; 70(9): 422-4, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23123541

ABSTRACT

Ibogaine is a naturally occurring psychoactive alkaloid extracted from the roots of the Tabernanthe iboga plant, which in alternative medicine is used to treat drug dependency. However, this upcoming, online advocated therapy can be dangerous due to its potentially lethal adverse effects. We present three cases in which toxic side effects were noted. We used the Naranjo scale to estimate the probability of a causal relationship between these effects and ibogaine. Findings in these three cases are suggestive of a causal relationship between the use of ibogaine and serious respiratory and cardiac problems (including lengthening of the QT interval). In our opinion it is of great importance that clinicians are aware of these potentially serious side effects and realise that widespread online marketing practices will give many more people access to ibogaine.


Subject(s)
Ibogaine/adverse effects , Tachycardia, Ventricular/chemically induced , Tachycardia/chemically induced , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Substance-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Torsades de Pointes/chemically induced
3.
Fam Pract ; 29(4): 383-93, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22159030

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Excessive prescription of antibiotics in patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is common in primary care and might be reduced by rapid point-of-care (POC) C-reactive protein (CRP) testing. However, the exact benefits of this test are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To review the available evidence for the role of POC CRP measurement in (i) guiding antibiotic prescription, (ii) predicting aetiology, (iii) prognosis and (iv) diagnosis (pneumonia) in LRTI patients. METHODS: For each research question, studies were retrieved through an electronic literature search in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library using synonyms for CRP and LRTI combined with different relevant subheadings. Study quality was assessed using validated instruments and predefined outcome measures were extracted from each study. RESULTS: The search yielded 13 articles, each answering one or more questions; one was excluded by insufficient internal validity. (i) One of four studies showed a significant reduction in the antibiotic prescriptions when applying POC CRP measurement [relative risk (RR) 0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-0.7]. (ii) Three studies on aetiology demonstrated that an elevated CRP was associated with bacterial [odds ratio (OR) 2.46-4.8] and one with viral (OR 2.7) aetiology. (iii) Results on the prognostic value were contradictory, providing evidence for faster symptom resolution (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.1-1.3), higher mortality rate (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.1) and no difference in outcome in patients with high CRP levels. (iv) Four studies showed that CRP had limited value as a single predictor of pneumonia. When combined with clinical assessment, its value increased according to two of these studies (receiver operating characteristic area from 0.7 to 0.9). However, methodological flaws and/or wide CIs limit the generalizability of findings in all studies. CONCLUSION: The evidence for the benefits of POC CRP measurement in LRTI patients in primary care is limited, contradictory and does not support its use to guide treatment decisions yet.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Point-of-Care Systems , Primary Health Care , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers/blood , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Bacterial/blood , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...