Percutaneous approach options for embolization of endoleak after iliac artery aneurysm repair: stick the sac or stick the gluteal artery.

Internal iliac artery aneurysms (IIAAs), isolated or associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms, are at rupture risk with growth. Treatment is recommended when symptomatic or greater than 3 cm. Surgical or endovascular therapy should exclude the arterial origin and outflow branches. If all outflow branches are not completely embolized, an endoleak can develop, pressurizing the sac leading to growth and rupture. Accessing the arteries involved can be technically challenging and understanding potential targets is critical. We describe two percutaneous approaches for treatment: percutaneously accessing the sac from an anterior trans-iliopsoas approach and percutaneously accessing the gluteal artery from a posterior approach.

Outcomes of transjugular liver biopsies for liver transplant recipients with bicaval and piggyback hepatic vein anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant hepatic venous anastomoses are usually created using "bicaval" or "piggyback" techniques, which may result in unfavorable angulation between the inferior vena cava and hepatic veins, and makes hepatic vein catheterization and tissue sampling during transjugular liver biopsy (TLB) technically challenging. PURPOSE: To compare the technical successes and complications of TLBs for recipients of liver transplants with bicaval and piggyback hepatic vein anastomoses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Information on type of hepatic vein surgical anastomosis was available for 190 adult patients in whom 306 consecutive TLBs were performed during 2009-2017: 158 with bicaval and 148 with piggyback anastomoses. The primary outcome of procedural success was defined as obtaining a tissue sample sufficient to make a pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: A technical success rate of 97% with adequate liver tissue for diagnosis was similar between the anastomotic groups (P = 0.50). TLB was unsuccessful in 3% of patients with piggyback anastomoses due to unfavorable hepatic venous anatomy whereas biopsy was successful in all patients with bicaval anastomoses (P = 0.02). Fluoroscopy times were not significantly different (12.1 vs. 13.9 min, P = 0.08). Rates of major complication were similar between the two groups (3% vs. 3%, P > 0.99). CONCLUSION: TLB is safe and effective for liver transplant patients regardless of the type of hepatic vein anastomosis. While failure to catheterize or advance the stiffened biopsy cannula into the hepatic vein is more likely to occur in patients with piggyback anastomoses, this is a rare occurrence.

Intraperitoneal metastases after transarterial embolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: An observational study.

PURPOSE: Transarterial embolization is frequently used to treat local hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While various complications are known to occur following transarterial embolization, only one prior case of peritoneal spread of HCC occurring shortly after transarterial chemoembolization has been reported. We present five cases of peritoneal spread of HCC following transarterial embolization (including bland embolization, conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and doxorubicin-eluting beads TACE) and identify features common among those cases. METHODS: Search of electronic radiology reports and images identified five patients with imaging before and after treatment of HCC with transarterial embolization and with newly developed peritoneal metastases after treatment. Various patient demographics and tumor characteristics were noted. RESULTS: The mean maximal diameter of the treated HCC tumors was 3.7 cm (range 1.4-11.9 cm). Three of the patients had ascites and treated tumors in the posterior right hepatic lobe, and all patients had subcapsular tumors treated with transarterial embolization before developing peritoneal metastases. The mean time from treatment with transarterial embolization to the development of peritoneal metastases was four months. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal metastatic disease should be considered a rare but potential complication of transarterial embolization of subcapsular HCC, particularly in patients with ascites and tumors that are in the posterior segments of the right lobe. This potential complication should perhaps be considered when planning transarterial HCC treatment, and radiologists interpreting imaging after transarterial embolization of HCC should assess for peritoneal metastases.