A single ascending dose study of bapineuzumab in patients with Alzheimer disease.

The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of bapineuzumab (AAB-001), a humanized monoclonal antibody to amyloid beta, were evaluated in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease in a phase 1, randomized, third-party unblinded, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose trial. Thirty patients received bapineuzumab infusion of 0.5, 1.5, or 5 mg/kg or placebo (6 active, 2 placebo for 0.5 and 1.5-mg/kg cohorts; 10 active, 4 placebo for 5.0-mg/kg cohort). Three patients in the highest dose cohort (5.0 mg/kg) developed magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities consistent with vasogenic edema, predominantly high signal abnormalities on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences, all of which resolved over time. Plasma amyloid beta was elevated from baseline, peaking approximately 24 hours after infusion. PK analysis demonstrated a half-life of 21 to 26 days, supporting a 13-week dosing interval for bapineuzumab. This small, single-dose study demonstrated the safety profile and PK characteristics of bapineuzumab and was used to design later safety and efficacy trials.

Fiblast (trafermin) in acute stroke: results of the European-Australian phase II/III safety and efficacy trial.

BACKGROUND: Trafermin (basic fibroblast growth factor) has been shown to reduce infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke models, and to promote functional recovery and new synapse formation when given to animals with completed cerebral infarction. A previous study in acute stroke patients suggested that trafermin was safe and well tolerated when given over a 3-hour period over a wide dose range. METHODS AND RESULTS: Double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial of a single 24-hour intravenous infusion of trafermin. Patients having onset of stroke symptoms within 6 h and a baseline score of >/=7 on the NIH Stroke Scale (>/=2 motor) were randomized to receive 5 or 10 mg of trafermin or placebo intravenously infused over 24 h. The primary efficacy outcome was a categorized combination of the Barthel and Rankin scales assessed at 90 days. A total of 286 patients had been enrolled at 55 sites in 11 countries when the sponsor directed that enrollment be stopped because an interim analysis of efficacy data predicted too small a chance of demonstrating a statistically significant benefit after recruitment of the planned 900 patients. The 5-mg group showed a slight but nonsignificant advantage over placebo (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.72-2.00, p = 0.48); the 10-mg group showed a nonsignificant disadvantage (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.44-1.22, p = 0.24). Mortality rates at 90 days were 17% in the 5-mg group, 24% in the 10-mg group and 18% in the placebo group. Treatment with trafermin was associated with an increased leukocytosis and a decrease in blood pressure: mean decrease in systolic blood pressure from baseline was 19 mm Hg in the 5-mg group, 22 mm Hg in the 10-mg group and 8 mm Hg in the placebo group. In a post hoc subgroup analysis, patients in the 5-mg group treated more than 5 h after the onset of symptoms showed an apparent advantage over placebo (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.00-4.41, p = 0.044; after age adjustment: OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.91-4.13, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: With the proper treatment regimen, trafermin can likely be given safely to stroke patients. The 5-mg dose showed a trend toward a treatment advantage. The ideal time window for this agent may exceed 5 h. This may open new avenues for acute stroke therapy, aiming at enhancing recovery mechanisms rather than immediate neuroprotection.

Can improvement in well-being and functioning be distinguished from depression improvement in antidepressant clinical trials?

The Inventory of General Life Functioning (GLF), a self-evaluation scale for patients, was developed for use in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. The scale was designed to evaluate patient general well-being and functioning, areas not adequately covered by standard depression scales. We used the patient self-report version of the GLF in two imipramine-controlled clinical trials during the development of the antidepressant venlafaxine. In these double-blind studies, outpatients with depression received placebo (n = 158), venlafaxine (n = 152), or imipramine (n = 149) for up to 6 weeks. We examined the internal consistency and factor structure of the GLF, its correlation with standard depression rating scales, and its sensitivity to differential treatment effects. We found the scale to be internally consistent and moderately correlated with physician-rated measures of depression. A reported two-factor structure (general well-being and functioning) was evaluated by factor analysis. When analyses were restricted to patients who completed at least 4 weeks on therapy, the GLF displayed sensitivity to differential treatment effects. The GLF total and factor subscales demonstrated the superiority of an active therapy (venlafaxine) to placebo; the GLF factor and a 7-item subscale using only items derived from Dupuy's psychological general well-being index (PGWB) demonstrated an advantage for one active therapy (venlafaxine) over another (imipramine). The GLF is a useful complement to the standard depression rating scales because it may assess additional dimensions of the depressive syndrome.