Bathing hospitalized dependent patients with prepackaged disposable washcloths instead of traditional bath basins: A case-crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Basins used for patient bathing have been shown to be contaminated with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and have prompted the evaluation of alternatives to soap and water bathing methods. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label interventional crossover study to assess the impact of replacing traditional bath basins with prepackaged washcloths on the incidence of hospital-associated infections (HAIs), MDROs, and secondarily, rates of skin deterioration. Unit-wide use of disposable washcloths over an 8-month period was compared with an 8-month period of standard care using basins. RESULTS: A total of 2,637 patients were included from 2 medical-surgical units at a single tertiary medical center, contributing 16,034 patient days. During the study period, there were a total of 33 unit-acquired infections, the rates of which were not statistically different between study phases (incidence rate ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-2.23; P = .88). However, occurrence of skin integrity deterioration was significantly less in the intervention group (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Although we were unable to demonstrate a significant reduction in HAI or MDRO acquisition, we found a decrease in skin deterioration with the use of disposable washcloths and confirmed earlier findings of MDRO contamination of wash basins.

Impact of Palliative Care Screening and Consultation in the ICU: A Multihospital Quality Improvement Project.

CONTEXT: There are few multicenter studies that examine the impact of systematic screening for palliative care and specialty consultation in the intensive care unit (ICU). OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of receiving palliative care consultation (PCC) for patients who screened positive on palliative care referral criteria. METHODS: In a prospective quality assurance intervention with a retrospective analysis, the covariate balancing propensity score method was used to estimate the conditional probability of receiving a PCC and to balance important covariates. For patients with and without PCCs, outcomes studied were as follows: 1) change to "do not resuscitate" (DNR), 2) discharge to hospice, 3) 30-day readmission, 4) hospital length of stay (LOS), 5) total direct hospital costs. RESULTS: In 405 patients with positive screens, 161 (40%) who received a PCC were compared to 244 who did not. Patients receiving PCCs had higher rates of DNR-adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 7.5; 95% CI 5.6-9.9) and hospice referrals-(AOR = 7.6; 95% CI 5.0-11.7). They had slightly lower 30-day readmissions-(AOR = 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.0); no overall difference in direct costs or LOS was found between the two groups. When patients receiving PCCs were stratified by time to PCC initiation, early consultation-by Day 4 of admission-was associated with reductions in LOS (1.7 days [95% CI -3.1, -1.2]) and average direct variable costs (-$1815 [95% CI -$3322, -$803]) compared to those who received no PCC. CONCLUSION: Receiving a PCC in the ICUs was significantly associated with more frequent DNR code status and hospice referrals, but not 30-day readmissions or hospital utilization. Early PCC was associated with significant LOS and direct cost reductions. Providing PCC early in the ICU should be considered.

Reducing Pressure Injury Incidence Using a Turn Team Assignment: Analysis of a Quality Improvement Project.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze outcomes of a quality improvement project that evaluated a turning intervention for prevention of facility-acquired pressure injuries. DESIGN: A descriptive correlational study design examined the effectiveness of using a "turn team assignment" on pressure injury incidence and staff perceptions. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The study sample comprised RNs and patient care associates assigned to provide care for patients admitted on the first or any subsequent day of hospitalization to a surgical intensive care unit at a Midwest inner-city teaching hospital. METHODS: Direct observation by expert clinicians occurred in 2-hour increments over a 14-day period using an 11-item, unit-designed process improvement tool. We collected information regarding cueing, concurrent turning, independent turning in lieu of the cue, staff support, and possible barriers to turning and repositioning. Staff perceptions were collected using an online tool via survey. The survey utilized a 14-item questionnaire, and a 5-point Likert Scale to identify staff perceptions and beliefs about the turn team intervention. Pressure injury occurrences were measured using data from our monthly prevalence study. RESULTS: Pressure injury occurrences declined from 24.9% to 16.8% over the data collection period. There was a strong positive correlation between verbal cueing and turning (r = 0.815; P < .05). Staff perceptions supported preintervention education (64.3%) and cueing (93%; 78%) as effective interventions in completing patient turning. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that turn team assignments using verbal cueing are an effective intervention that decreases pressure injury occurrence. This intervention required no increase in staffing personnel, making this type of intervention reasonable and effective in improving frequency of repositioning and decreasing pressure injury prevalence rates.

An interprofessional process to improve early identification and treatment for sepsis.

The course of sepsis is rapid. Patient outcomes improve when sepsis is diagnosed and treated quickly. The clinical goals of the evidence-based bundled strategies from the International consortium Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) include optimizing timeliness in the delivery of care and creating a continuum for sepsis management that runs from the emergency department (ED) to the acute and critical care settings. Successful implementation of processes that integrate sepsis bundles can improve patient mortality and hospital costs. Improving interprofessional education and collaboration are necessary to facilitate the effective use of bundled strategies. An intervention that included interprofessional education resulted in a statistically significant difference between the three phases studied. There was a statistically significant improvement between the phases for lactate completion X(2) = 16.908 (p < .01) after education. Frequency of blood cultures being obtained before antibiotic administration was nearing statistical significance (p < .054). There was an improvement in time to antibiotic administration between phase 2 (182.09 mean average minutes, SD = 234.06) and phase 3 (91.62 mean average minutes, SD = 167.99).

Nurse-led change: a statewide multidisciplinary collaboration targeting intensive care unit delirium.

For more than a decade, research has demonstrated both the widespread prevalence and negative outcomes associated with intensive care unit delirium. Hospitals are, therefore, being called to institute evidence-based protocols to prevent and manage its occurrence. Integrating evidence-based practice into bedside care can be a challenge. Having information ready and accessible is essential to implementing successful change. The state of Michigan, through the Michigan Health and Hospital Association Keystone Center, has historically gathered evidence and formulated processes to facilitate evidence implementation in statewide intensive care units. Toolkits have been developed to facilitate the spread of information and are used as a starting point for sites. This approach has been proven successful in reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonias and catheter-related blood stream infections, while in partnership with Johns Hopkins University. The purpose of this article is to describe the creation of evidence-based toolkits used to facilitate successful statewide changes in practice using an interprofessional team including nurses, physicians, and pharmacists. The content reflects a step-wise approach to not only engage and educate staff, but also strategies to execute and evaluate the effectiveness.

Discharge knowledge and concerns of patients going home with a wound.

PURPOSE: To examine patients' wound care knowledge and concerns prior to discharge from an acute care hospital. DESIGN: Comparative descriptive study of patients with wounds. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Participants (N = 76) included 17 men and 59 women who were African American (n = 33, 43.4%) or Caucasian (n = 43, 56.6%) and ranged in age from 20 to 83 years (M = 48, SD = 13). There were 67 persons with acute wounds and 9 with chronic wounds. All were scheduled to be discharged home from a large urban acute care hospital. INSTRUMENTS: The questionnaire for this study included the following sections: Demographic, Admission and Discharge, Health, Wound Care, Beliefs about Wounds and their Care, Pain and Wounds, Literacy and Learning, and Discharge Concerns. RESULTS: Participants' greatest concerns about going home were: (1) how active to be at home, (2) wound pain, (3) looking for wound complications, and (4) watching for wound infection. Many participants did not know the dressing (38.2%) or solution to cleanse the wound (58.7%) at home. Most had taken care of a wound before (67.1%), could see (68.4%) and reach (69.7%) the wound, and had looked at it (64.5%) during the hospitalization. Patients with acute and chronic wounds did not differ significantly in their concerns about their wound or their fear of taking care of their wound. Participants generally had appropriate knowledge about wounds and hand washing, nutrition, going out of the home, and cigarette smoking. They had incorrect information about drying out wounds and leaving them open to breathe the air. The majority of patients with chronic wounds preferred getting answers to questions about their wound and its care from their physician followed by their clinic and family/friends. Patients with acute wounds overwhelmingly chose their physician as a source of information about their wound and its care, followed by calling a nurse at the hospital and using the Internet. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were able to verbalize their concerns about going home with a wound. Concerns about discharge may help to direct patient teaching in preparation for discharge. Teaching literature could include the most common concerns, as well as ways to avoid misinformation about wound care. Discharge teaching needs to begin early so that patients feel they have adequate time to learn and ask questions. Further research is needed about patients' wound care knowledge and discharge concerns.

Nursing lessons from the MHA keystone ICU project: developing and implementing an innovative approach to patient safety.

Given the pivotal role of nurses in providing and supervising patient care, it is essential that nursing professionals are engaged fully in making care safer. Nursing involvement was instrumental in the Michigan Health and Hospital Association Keystone ICU Project, which resulted in rapid reduction in catheter-related blood stream infection rates and ventilator-associated pneumonia rates. Nurses of every credential and every nursing position participated in this broad scale improvement effort. This article describes the MHA Keystone ICU Project, including challenges implicit in changing nursing practice and team behavior in the ICU. The improvement strategies implemented by Keystone ICU teams, and lessons learned by nurses engaged in the work, are likely to have application in other clinical settings.

Bariatric surgery: patient incision care and discharge concerns.

Because it provides greater and more durable weight reduction than behavioral and pharmacological interventions for the morbidly obese, the number of bariatric surgeries is increasing - one such procedure is the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A cross-sectional study was conducted to examine incision care knowledge and discharge concerns of patients who had undergone this type of gastric bypass bariatric surgery. Participants (N = 31; 28 women, three men; mean age 45 years), recruited from a bariatric surgery center in a large, urban teaching hospital, had undergone a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass by either the open (n = 29) or laparoscopic (n = 2) method. Patients scheduled to be discharged home, 21 years of age or older, and able to understand and respond in English were eligible to participate. Participants completed questionnaires that included demographic information and rating scales regarding incision care knowledge, fears, and discharge concerns. Mean time from hospital admission to study participation was 1.1 days (SD = 3 days). Knowledge of incision care and amount of information received about incision care were rated low. The five most frequently mentioned postdischarge concerns included bowel trouble at home, wound pain at home, looking for wound complications, watching for wound infection, and activity limitations. The higher the amount of information received about incision care, the higher the patient's knowledge (r = .57, P <.001). Lower incision care knowledge scores were correlated with a higher fear of incision care (r = .46, P = .008) and patients reporting greater pain had more concerns about discharge (r = .49, P <.005). Little is known about preparing the bariatric surgery patient for discharge home. To improve outcomes, research that examines issues including discharge teaching methods, patient concerns, and information for persons undergoing bariatric surgery is needed.

Discharge information needs of patients after surgery.

Patients who have undergone surgical procedures often have self-care concerns in their preparation for discharge from the hospital. This article examines the research literature about information needs of postoperative patients prior to their discharge. The most common concerns were the incision/wound care, pain management, activity level, monitoring for complications, symptom management, elimination, and quality of life. Because of their clinical knowledge of the perioperative experience, wound, ostomy, and continence nurses and other advanced practice nurses have a critical role in the development of discharge-educational programs for postoperative patients and caregivers. Because unmet discharge needs can contribute to poor patient outcomes and readmission, it is critical that wound, ostomy, and continence nurses, advanced practice nurses, and clinical staff nurses accurately identify patients' informational needs and find ways to meet these needs especially with the aging population, new/advanced surgical procedures, vulnerability/poverty, and literacy level of patients.