ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tumour budding, described as the presence of single cells or small clusters of up to five tumour cells at the invasive margin, is established as a prognostic marker in colorectal carcinoma. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the molecular signature of tumour budding cells and the corresponding tumour bulk. METHODS: Tumour bulk and budding areas were microdissected and processed for RNA-sequencing. As little RNA was obtained from budding cells, a special low-input mRNA library preparation protocol was used. Gene expression profiles of budding as compared with tumour bulk were investigated for established EMT signatures, consensus molecular subtype (CMS), gene set enrichment and pathway analysis. RESULTS: A total of 296 genes were differentially expressed with an FDR <0.05 and a twofold change between tumour bulk and budding regions. Genes that were upregulated in the budding signature were mainly involved in cell migration and survival while downregulated genes were important for cell proliferation. Supervised clustering according to an established EMT gene signature categorised budding regions as EMT-positive, whereas tumour bulk was considered EMT-negative. Furthermore, a shift from CMS2 (epithelial) to CMS4 (mesenchymal) was observed as tumour cells transit from the tumour bulk to the budding regions. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour budding regions are characterised by a phenotype switch compared with the tumour bulk, involving the acquisition of migratory characteristics and a decrease in cell proliferation. In particular, most tumour budding signatures were EMT-positive and switched from an epithelial subtype (CMS2) in the tumour bulk to a mesenchymal subtype (CMS4) in budding cells.
Subject(s)
Cell Division/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition/genetics , Genes, Switch/genetics , Transcriptome , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cell Proliferation/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Phenotype , Tissue Array AnalysisABSTRACT
Budding is a process during which individual or small clusters of up to five tumour cells detach from the main tumour mass and invade into the surrounding stroma. In colorectal cancer, this feature is observed in 20-40% of cases and is associated with lymphovascular invasion, lymph node and distant metastases, and poor prognosis. A variety of scoring systems for budding have been proposed but so far a gold standard is lacking, hampering implementation of a budding score in guidelines for pathological examination of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, little is known about the mechanisms which cause tumour cells to detach from the main tumour mass and obtain increased invasive potential. In this review, we present an overview of tumour budding including its definition, scoring systems, prognostic relevance and biological mechanisms involved.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition/physiology , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Forkhead box gene P1 (FOXP1) has proven to be a valuable prognostic biomarker in lymphomas, but little is known about this gene in colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the expression of FOXP1 in CRC and its potential associations with outcome in CRC. METHODS: We studied the expression pattern of FOXP1 retrospectively via immunohistochemistry in a series of 165 - CRC cases. Fluorescent in situ hybridization and RNA sequencing on FOXP1 knockdown cell lines were performed to investigate the mechanism of action and target genes of FOXP1. RESULTS: Complete loss of nuclear FOXP1 expression was observed in 11.5% of the subjects. A total of 70.9% of subjects showed a heterogeneous FOXP1 expression pattern, and 17.6% of them had high FOXP1 expression. Impaired expression of FOXP1 was significantly correlated with reduced survival rates by multivariate analysis (P = .004). We found no chromosomal aberrations involving FOXP1 in individuals with FOXP1 negativity via immunohistochemical testing. RNA sequencing revealed that genes involved in inflammation and cell proliferation were differentially expressed after FOXP1 knockdown. CONCLUSIONS: In our case series, loss of FOXP1 was associated with reduced survival rates in CRC tissue. Also, FOXP1 affects proliferation and inflammatory reaction in colorectal neoplasia.
