Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Psychol Med ; 48(6): 879-888, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28956518

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Auditory Hallucinations (AH) are nowadays regarded as symptoms following a continuum; from a (transient) phenomenon in healthy individuals on one end to a symptom of (psychiatric) illnesses at the other. An accumulating number of epidemiological studies focused on the prevalence of AH in the general population, but results vary widely. The current meta-analysis aims to synthesize existing evidence on lifetime prevalence of AH across the lifespan. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were combined to calculate a mean lifetime general population AH prevalence rate. Moreover, prevalences were calculated for four age groups: children (5-12 years), adolescents (13-17 years), adults (18-60 years) and elderly (⩾60 years). RESULTS: We retrieved 25 study samples including 84 711 participants. Mean lifetime prevalence rate of AH was 9.6% (95% CI 6.7-13.6%). The mean lifetime prevalence was similar in children (12.7%) and adolescents (12.4%), but these two groups differed significantly from the adults (5.8%) and the elderly (4.5%). Significant heterogeneity indicated that there is still dispersion in true prevalence rates between studies, even within the different age categories. CONCLUSIONS: Current meta-analysis shows that AH are quite common (up to one in ten individuals) in the general population during lifetime, with children and adolescents reporting these experiences significantly more often compared with adults and elderly. Large follow-up studies on the longitudinal course of AH are needed to reveal associated risk and resilience factors.


Subject(s)
Hallucinations/epidemiology , Hallucinations/psychology , Longevity , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
Glia ; 64(11): 1857-68, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27442614

ABSTRACT

The biology of microglia has become subject to intense study, as they are widely recognized as crucial determinants of normal and pathologic brain functioning. While they are well studied in animal models, it is still strongly debated what specifies most accurately the phenotype and functioning of microglia in the human brain. In this study, we therefore isolated microglia from postmortem human brain tissue of corpus callosum (CC) and frontal cortex (CTX). The cells were phenotyped for a panel of typical microglia markers and genes involved in myeloid cell biology. Furthermore, their response to pro- and anti-inflammatory stimuli was assessed. The microglia were compared to key human myeloid cell subsets, including monocytes, monocyte-derived macrophages and monocyte-derived dendritic cells, and several commonly used microglial cell models. Protein and mRNA expression profiles partly differed between microglia isolated from CC and frontal cortex and were clearly distinct from other myeloid subsets. Microglia responded to both pro- (LPS or poly I:C) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4 or dexamethasone) stimuli. Interestingly, pro-inflammatory responses differed between microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages, as the former responded more strongly to poly I:C and the latter more strongly to LPS. Furthermore, we defined a large phenotypic discrepancy between primary human microglia and currently used microglial cell models and cell lines. In conclusion, we further delineated the unique and specific features that discriminate human microglia from other myeloid subsets, and we show that currently used cellular models only partly reflect the phenotype of primary human microglia. GLIA 2016;64:1857-1868.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression/physiology , Microglia/physiology , Myeloid Cells/classification , Myeloid Cells/physiology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Antigens, CD/genetics , Antigens, CD/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Corpus Callosum/cytology , Cytokines/genetics , Cytokines/metabolism , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Flow Cytometry , Frontal Lobe/cytology , Gene Expression/drug effects , Humans , Interleukin-4/pharmacology , Lipopolysaccharides/pharmacology , Macrophages/drug effects , Macrophages/metabolism , Microglia/drug effects , Monocytes/drug effects , Monocytes/metabolism , Poly I-C/pharmacology , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors
4.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 57(6): 446-51, 2015.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26073839

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Our knowledge about auto-immune limbic encephalitis is increasing rapidly and it is now evident that patients with this disease can present with psychiatric symptoms. AIM: To propose practical guidelines for the recognition and diagnosis of an underlying auto-immune limbic encephalitis in patients with acute psychiatric symptoms. METHOD: We studied recent reviews on the topic and had discussions with psychiatrists, a neurologist and a neuroimmunologist in order to reach consensus. RESULTS: Auto-immune limbic encephalitis is a rather rare but important diagnostic consideration in patients with acute psychiatric symptoms. We describe the different steps in the diagnostic work-up and mention features that can point to an underlying auto-immune encephalitis. These include atypical psychiatric symptoms, seizures, movement disorders and autonomic instability. CONCLUSION: Since patients with autoimmune limbic encephalitis often present with psychiatric symptoms, curative treatment is often available and the prognosis depends on the delay from presentation to treatment, psychiatrists should be aware of the signs of an underlying autoimmune encephalitis which have been described in this article.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/psychology , Limbic Encephalitis/psychology , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Autoantibodies/blood , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Limbic Encephalitis/diagnosis , Limbic Encephalitis/immunology , Mental Disorders/immunology , Practice Guidelines as Topic
5.
Psychol Med ; 38(9): 1361-7, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17825125

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The DSM-IV-R classification Pervasive Developmental Disorder - Not otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS) is based on the symptoms for autism and includes a wide variety of phenotypes that do not meet full criteria for autism. As such, PDD-NOS is a broad and poorly defined residual category of the autism spectrum disorders. In order to address the heterogeneity in this residual category it may be helpful to define clinical and neurobiological subtypes. Multiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD) may constitute such a subtype. In order to study the neurobiological specificity of MCDD in comparison with other autism spectrum disorders, we investigated brain morphology in children (age 7-15 years) with MCDD compared to children with autism and typically developing controls. METHOD: Structural MRI measures were compared between 22 high-functioning subjects with MCDD and 21 high-functioning subjects with autism, and 21 matched controls. RESULTS: Subjects with MCDD showed an enlarged cerebellum and a trend towards larger grey-matter volume compared to control subjects. Compared to subjects with autism, subjects with MCDD had smaller intracranial volume. CONCLUSIONS: We report a pattern of volumetric changes in the brains of subjects with MCDD, similar to that seen in autism. However, no enlargement in head size was found. This suggests that although some of the neurobiological changes associated with MCDD overlap with those in autism, others do not. These neurobiological changes may reflect differences in the developmental trajectories associated with these two subtypes of autism spectrum disorders.


Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder/diagnosis , Brain/pathology , Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/diagnosis , Developmental Disabilities/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Phenotype , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Male , Netherlands , Organ Size
6.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 111(7): 903-29, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15206006

ABSTRACT

Autism is now widely viewed as a neurodevelopmental disorder, although the underlying biological causes remain to be established. In this review, we examine the literature in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as applied to autism, discuss the findings that have emerged, and give directions for potential future research. To date, structural MRI results are inconsistent, partly due to the heterogeneity of the disorder itself, and partly due to the different composition and the varied degree of matching of the studied groups. However, recent studies have begun to elucidate the underlying neuroanatomical abnormalities and brain-behavior relationships in autism, with the most consistent finding being increased brain volume in autism. Future large-scale longitudinal structural imaging studies, starting at very young ages, investigating homogeneous groups of patients and extensively matched control groups, and making use of (combinations of) newer and more sophisticated techniques, hold a great promise to further elucidate the enigma of autism.


Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder/pathology , Brain/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...