Caregiver Burden of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Qualitative Study.

Rationale & Objective: There is limited published research on how autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) impacts caregivers. This study explored how caregivers of individuals with ADPKD perceive the burdens placed on them by the disease. Study Design: Qualitative study consisting of focus groups and interviews. Discussions were conducted by trained interviewers using semi-structured interview guides. Setting & Participants: The research was conducted in 14 countries in North America, South America, Asia, Australia, and Europe. Eligible participants were greater than or equal to 18 years old and caring for a child or adult diagnosed with ADPKD. Analytical Approach: The concepts reported were coded using qualitative research software. Data saturation was reached when subsequent discussions introduced no new key concepts. Results: Focus groups and interviews were held with 139 participants (mean age, 44.9 years; 66.9% female), including 25 participants who had a diagnosis of ADPKD themselves. Caregivers reported significant impact on their emotional (74.1%) and social life (38.1%), lost work productivity (26.6%), and reduced sleep (25.2%). Caregivers also reported worry about their financial situation (23.7%). In general, similar frequencies of impact were reported among caregivers with ADPKD versus caregivers without ADPKD, with the exception of sleep (8.0% vs 28.9%, respectively), leisure activities (28.0% vs 40.4% respectively), and work/employment (12.0% vs 29.8%, respectively). Limitations: The study was observational and designed to elicit concepts, and only descriptive analyses were conducted. Conclusions: These findings highlight the unique burden on caregivers in ADPKD, which results in substantial emotional, social, and professional/financial impact.

Polycystic Kidney Disease-Related Disease Burden in Adolescents With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: An International Qualitative Study.

Rationale & Objective: Little is known about symptoms and disease impacts in adolescents with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). The objective of the study was to explore these issues from the adolescent patient's perspective. Study Design: Observational, qualitative study. Setting & Participants: Eligible participants were 12-17 years old and had a diagnosis of ADPKD. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 18 cities in 13 countries to elicit participant experiences of ADPKD-related symptoms and physical, social, and emotional impacts. Analytical Approach: Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. Symptom and impact frequencies from the interviews were calculated, and representative quotes concerning elicited concepts were collated. Results: Thirty-three participants (mean age, 14.6 years; 42.4% female) completed interviews. Frequently reported symptoms included urinary urgency (n = 10; 30.3%) and back pain (n = 9; 27.3%). Consistent with previous findings in adults, participants experienced 3 primary types of pain: dull kidney pain, severe or sharp kidney pain, and a feeling of fullness and/or discomfort. Reported disease impacts included avoiding sports and physical activity (n = 10; 30.3%), missing school (n = 6; 18.2%) and social activities (n = 6; 18.2%), and feeling worried (n = 6; 18.2%), sad (n = 4; 12.1%), or frustrated (n = 3; 9.1%) about the disease and their future. Approximately one-fifth of participants (n = 7; 21.2%) reported that they were bothered or impacted by dietary limitations (primarily the need for reduced sodium intake and increased water intake). Limitations: The study had a small sample size. The researchers were unable to conduct focus groups with participants because of parental preferences. Conclusions: The findings from this exploratory study indicate that a substantial proportion of adolescents with ADPKD experience physical, social, and emotional impacts from their disease.

Developing a Conceptual Disease Model of Patient Experiences and Identifying Patient-Reported Clinical Outcome Assessments for Use in Trials of Treatments for Focal Onset Seizures.

Purpose: To identify concepts important to understanding the experiences of adults with focal onset seizures (FOS) and evaluate clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for measuring these concepts in clinical trials of treatments for FOS. Methods: A search of published qualitative research, clinical trials, and approved product labels for FOS treatments was performed to develop a conceptual disease model (CDM) of patients' experience of living with FOS. Concepts of interest (COI) were selected, and a second literature search was conducted to identify COAs measuring these concepts. Ten COAs were selected and reviewed to document their development process, evidence of measurement properties, and methods for interpreting change scores using criteria proposed in regulatory guidelines for patient-reported outcomes to support label claims. Results: Concepts identified from the published literature (13 articles, 1 conference abstract), 24 clinical trials, and 8 product labels were included in a novel CDM. Impacts on physical, cognitive, and social and emotional function were chosen as COI for evaluating treatment outcomes for FOS; the additional concept of social support and coping strategies was chosen to understand patients' lived experiences. From 51 unique COAs identified, 10 were selected based on their potential coverage of the COI; some symptom severity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) COAs covered multiple COI. Of these 10, 8 COAs evaluated impacts/limitations on physical function, 8 measured social and emotional impacts, and 5 assessed social support and coping strategies. While most assessments had gaps in evidence validating their measurement properties, 2 COAs measuring symptom severity and 1 COA measuring HRQoL had evidence confirming their potential utility in clinical trials to support label claims. Conclusion: This research provides insights into the experience of patients with FOS and identifies COAs that measure concepts considered to support endpoints in clinical trials for FOS.

A comparison of PROMIS Global Health-Mental and legacy orthopedic outcome measures for evaluating preoperative mental health status.

The influence of mental health on postoperative outcomes necessitates comparison of the mental health constructs captured by patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). 1,026 patients completed preoperative PROMs including the PROMIS Physical Function (PF), PROMIS Global Health (GH), and a subspecialty-specific PROM. Across specialties, PROMIS GH-Physical, PF-CAT, and PF-SF scores correlated more strongly with all legacy PROMs than the GH-Mental score. Moderate to strong correlation between the PF-SF, PF-CAT, and GH-Physical questionnaires and subspecialty-specific PROMs across specialties suggest they assess similar concepts. Lower correlation between the GH-Mental and subspecialty-specific PROMs suggest that the GH-Mental questionnaire captures distinct patient-reported mental health.

Opioid Prescribing Guidelines for Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy Based on Patient-reported Opioid Consumption.

The purpose of our study was to determine the optimum number of opioid pills and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) required to treat postoperative pain following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. A retrospective cohort study of 77 patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy between January, 2017 and May, 2019 was conducted. Of patients, 19.48% took no opioids following surgery. Patients were prescribed 84.34 ± 49.54 MME on average and took 28.23 ± 40.99 MME. This equated to an average of 16.52 ± 8.85 narcotic pills prescribed and 4.90 ± 6.26 pills taken. Of 77 patients, 66 (85.7%) took less than 10 total pills, and 57 (74.0%) took 5 or fewer. Patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy are commonly overprescribed opioids postoperatively. On average, patients consumed just under five narcotic pills, less than one-third of the number prescribed. A standard prescription of 5 opioid pills or 25 MME is recommended for patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 29(4):240-243, 2020).

Health state utilities for skeletal-related events secondary to bone metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with bone metastases often experience skeletal-related events (SREs). Although cost-utility models are used to examine treatments for metastatic cancer, limited information is available on utilities of SREs. The purpose of this study was to estimate the disutility of four SREs: spinal cord compression, pathological fracture, radiation to bone, and surgery performed to stabilize a bone. METHODS: General population participants from the UK and Canada completed time trade-off (TTO) interviews to assess the utility of health states drafted based on literature review, clinician interviews, and patient interviews. Respondents first rated a health state describing cancer with bone metastases. Then, the SREs were added to this health state. RESULTS: Interviews were completed with 187 participants (50.8 % male, 80.2 % white). Cancer with bone metastases without an SRE had a mean utility of 0.47 (SD = 0.43) on a standard utility scale (1 = full health, 0 = death). Of the SREs, spinal cord compression was associated with the greatest disutility (i.e., the utility decrease): -0.32 with paralysis and -0.22 without paralysis. Surgery had a disutility of -0.07. Leg, arm, and rib fractures had disutilities of -0.06, -0.04, and -0.03. Two weeks of daily radiation treatment had a disutility of -0.06, while two radiation appointments had the smallest impact on utility (-0.02). CONCLUSION: All SREs were associated with statistically significant utility decreases, suggesting a perceived impact on quality of life beyond the impact of cancer with bone metastases. The resulting disutilities may be used in cost-utility models examining treatments to prevent SREs secondary to bone metastases.

The development of a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing nighttime symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is important for monitoring and managing the disease and for evaluating outcomes of interventions. COPD patients experience symptoms during the day and night, and symptoms experienced at night often disturb sleep. The aim of this paper is to describe methods used to develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for evaluating nighttime symptoms of COPD, and to document evidence for the content validity of the instrument. METHODS: Literature review and clinician interviews were conducted to inform discussion guides to explore patients' nighttime COPD symptom experience. Data from focus groups with COPD patients was used to develop a conceptual framework and the content of a new PRO instrument. Patient understanding of the new instrument was assessed via cognitive interviews with COPD patients. RESULTS: The literature review confirmed that there is no instrument with evidence of content validity currently available to assess nighttime symptoms of COPD. Additionally, the literature review and clinician interviews suggested the need to understand patients' experience of specific symptoms in order to evaluate nighttime symptoms of COPD. Analyses of patient focus group data (N = 27) supported saturation of concepts and aided in development of a conceptual framework. Items were generated using patients' terminology to collect data on concepts in the framework including the occurrence and severity of COPD symptoms, use of rescue medication at night, and nocturnal awakening. Response options were chosen to reflect concepts that were salient to patients. Subsequent cognitive interviewing with ten COPD patients demonstrated that the items, response options, recall period, and instructions were understandable, relevant, and interpreted as intended. CONCLUSIONS: A new PRO instrument, the Nighttime Symptoms of COPD Instrument (NiSCI), was developed with documented evidence of content validity. The NiSCI is ready for empirical testing, including item reduction and evaluation of psychometric properties.

Validation of a patient interview for assessing reasons for antipsychotic discontinuation and continuation.

INTRODUCTION: The Reasons for Antipsychotic Discontinuation Interview (RAD-I) was developed to assess patients' perceptions of reasons for discontinuing or continuing an antipsychotic. The current study examined reliability and validity of domain scores representing three factors contributing to these treatment decisions: treatment benefits, adverse events, and distal reasons other than direct effects of the medication. METHODS: Data were collected from patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and their treating clinicians. For approximately 25% of patients, a second rater completed the RAD-I for assessment of inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: All patients (n = 121; 81 discontinuation, 40 continuation) reported at least one reason for discontinuation or continuation (mean = 2.8 reasons for discontinuation; 3.4 for continuation). Inter-rater reliability was supported (kappas = 0.63-1.0). Validity of the discontinuation domain scores was supported by associations with symptom measures (the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia, the Clinical Global Impression - Schizophrenia Scale; r = 0.30 to 0.51; all P < 0.01), patients' primary reasons for discontinuation, and adverse events. However, the continuation domain scores were not significantly associated with these other indicators. DISCUSSION: Results support the reliability, convergent validity, and known-groups validity of the RAD-I for assessing patients' reasons for antipsychotic discontinuation. Further research is needed to examine validity of the RAD-I continuation section.

Validation of a clinician questionnaire to assess reasons for antipsychotic discontinuation and continuation among patients with schizophrenia.

The Reasons for Antipsychotic Discontinuation Questionnaire (RAD-Q) was designed to assess clinicians' perceptions of reasons for antipsychotic discontinuation or continuation. The current study examined psychometric properties of this instrument and patterns of antipsychotic discontinuation. The sample of 121 patients (81 discontinuation, 40 continuation) with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was 66.9% male, with a mean age of 41.6 years. Treating clinicians reported a mean of 4.1 reasons for discontinuation and 7.5 reasons for continuation. RAD-Q domain scores were derived to quantify the impact of three factors on the decision to discontinue or continue: treatment benefits, adverse events, and distal reasons other than direct effects of the medication. Analysis of inter-rater reliability indicated an acceptable degree of agreement between clinicians (weighted Kappa for discontinuation scores=0.70-0.78). Correlations with symptom measures (Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale (CGI-SCH), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)) supported convergent validity of the benefits domain score (r=0.28-0.47; all p<0.05). Domain scores discriminated among groups of patients differing in clinician and patient-reported clinical variables. Results suggest that the RAD-Q is a useful detailed measure of reasons for antipsychotic discontinuation and continuation. Findings indicate that clinicians usually report multiple reasons for discontinuation, rather than a single reason for each patient.

Utilities and disutilities for attributes of injectable treatments for type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Although cost-utility models are frequently used to estimate treatment outcomes for type 2 diabetes, utilities are not available for key attributes of injectable treatments. The purpose of this study was to identify the utility or disutility of three injection-related attributes (dose frequency, dose flexibility, injection site reaction) that may influence patient preference. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes in Scotland completed standard gamble (SG) interviews to assess the utility of hypothetical health states and their own current health state. The EQ-5D, PGWB, IWQOL-Lite, and QIDS were also administered. Construct validity and differences among health states were examined. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients completed interviews. Of the three injection-related attributes, dose frequency was the only attribute with a statistically significant impact on utility (in a multiple regression model, p = 0.01). Weekly injections were associated with an average added utility of 0.023 in comparison to everyday injections. Flexible dosing and injection site reactions resulted in somewhat smaller utility shifts that were in the expected directions (+0.006 and -0.011, respectively). SG utility of current health (mean = 0.897) demonstrated construct validity through statistically significant correlations with patient-reported outcome measures. DISCUSSION: The three injection attributes were associated with small utility shifts in the expected directions. Dose frequency appears to be the most important of the three attributes from the patients' perspective. The vignette-based SG approach was feasible and useful for assessing added utility or disutility of injection-related attributes associated with treatments for type 2 diabetes.