Palliative radiotherapy and chemotherapy instead of surgery in symptomatic rectal cancer with synchronous unresectable metastases: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: In stage IV rectal cancer, palliative surgery is often carried out upfront. This study investigated whether the surgery can be avoided. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with symptomatic primary rectal adenocarcinoma and synchronous distant metastases deemed to be unresectable received 5 × 5 Gy irradiation and then oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Before treatment, 38% of patients had a near-obstructing lesion. The palliative effect was evaluated by questionnaires completed by the patients. RESULTS: The median follow-up for living patients was 26 months (range 19-34). The median overall survival was 11.5 months. Eight patients (20%) required surgery during the course of their disease: seven patients required stoma creation and one had local excision. Thirty percent of patients had a complete resolution of pelvic symptoms during the whole course of the disease, and 35% had significant improvement. In the subgroup with a near-obstructing lesion, 23% of patients required stoma creation. In all patients, the probability of requiring palliative surgery at 2 years was 17.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13% to 22%), and the probability of sustained good palliative effect after radiotherapy and chemotherapy was 67% (95% CI 58% to 76%). CONCLUSION: Short-course radiotherapy and chemotherapy allowed most patients to avoid surgery, even those with a near-obstructing lesion. CLINICALTRIALS: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT01157806.

Endosonography versus helical computed tomography for locoregional staging of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endosonography (EUS) has been shown to be more accurate than incremental computed tomography (CT) in the local (T) and regional (N) staging of gastric carcinoma; however, EUS has never been compared with helical CT (HCT). The fifth edition of the TNM classification changed the guidelines for N-staging of gastric carcinoma. The accuracy of imaging methods in this new system remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Staging accuracy of EUS and HCT were compared prospectively with pathological or intraoperative findings in 88 gastric carcinoma patients. Staging was done according to the fourth and fifth editions of the TNM classification. EUS was done with a radial echo endoscope, and HCT with a scanner with two rows of detectors (two-phase contrast-enhanced scanning of a water-filled stomach). RESULTS: The T-staging accuracy of EUS (63 %, CI 52 - 73 %) was superior to the accuracy of HCT (44 %, CI 34 - 55 %; P = 0.021). N-staging accuracy of both methods was similar when the fourth edition of the TNM classification was used (EUS 47 %, CI 34 - 60 %; HCT 52 %, CI 38 - 65 %). However, HCT was more accurate than EUS when the fifth edition of the classification was applied (EUS 30 %, CI 18 - 43 %, HCT 47 %, CI 34 - 60 %; P = 0.044). The accuracy of detection of lymph node metastases was similar for both methods (EUS 67 %, CI 54 - 78 %; HCT 77 %, CI 64 - 86 %). CONCLUSIONS: EUS is more accurate than HCT in the T-staging of gastric carcinoma. Both methods are comparable for N-staging, when this is done according to the older, fourth edition of the TNM classification. If the fifth edition is used, EUS is less accurate than HCT.

Transabdominal ultrasound for visualizing gastric submucosal tumors diagnosed by endosonography: can surveillance be simplified?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Management options for gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) include tumor removal or surveillance. If the latter is chosen, it requires repeated measurements of the tumor diameter. Although this can be achieved using endoscopy or endosonography (EUS), a less invasive and cheaper method would be welcome. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the proportion of gastric SMTs that can be visualized using transabdominal ultrasound of the water-filled stomach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients with endosonographically diagnosed gastric SMTs underwent transabdominal ultrasound examinations of the water-filled stomach performed immediately after EUS; both procedures were carried out by the same investigator. Transabdominal ultrasound was considered positive only if: firstly, the tumor was visualized unequivocally; secondly, its dimensions could be measured; and thirdly, photographic documentation could be recorded. In each case, a positive result had to be confirmed by an independent investigator, who reviewed the photographic documentation. RESULTS: The median size of SMTs on EUS was 25 mm (range 4 - 55 mm). Twelve tumors were located in the antrum, 25 in the gastric body, and 14 in the gastric fundus or cardia. Transabdominal ultrasound demonstrated the tumor in 35 of 51 patients (69 %). For tumors < or = 30 mm, the visualization rate was 61 % (22 of 36). The location of the tumor and its EUS features did not significantly affect the sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: In 69 % of patients with endosonographically diagnosed gastric SMTs, the tumor can also be visualized (and measured) using transabdominal ultrasound of the water-filled stomach. This noninvasive and inexpensive method may potentially be useful for surveillance in patients with SMTs, and further evaluation in this setting is warranted.

Helical computed tomographic cholangiography versus endosonography for suspected bile duct stones: a prospective blinded study in non-jaundiced patients.

BACKGROUND: Helical computed tomography performed after intravenous administration of a cholangiographic contrast material (HCT-cholangiography) may be useful for detecting bile duct stones in non-jaundiced patients. However, this method has never been compared with other non-invasive biliary imaging tests. AIMS: To compare prospectively HCT-cholangiography and endosonography (EUS) in a group of non-jaundiced patients with suspected bile duct stones. METHODS: Fifty two subjects underwent both HCT-cholangiography and EUS. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP), with or without instrumental bile duct exploration, served as a reference method, and was successful in all but two patients. RESULTS: Thirty four patients (68%) were found to have choledocholithiasis at ERCP. The sensitivity for HCT-cholangiography in stone detection was 85%, specificity 88%, and accuracy 86%. For EUS the sensitivity was 91%, specificity 100%, and accuracy 94%. The differences were not significant. No serious complications occurred with either method. CONCLUSIONS: HCT-cholangiography and EUS are safe and comparably accurate methods for detecting bile duct stones in non-jaundiced patients.