Multilab Validation Report for the Verification and Subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes Using qPCR.

Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) is a Gram-positive bacterium that causes invasive listeriosis, an illness with high mortality and hospitalization rates. Due to the severity of illness associated with Lm, rapid identification and characterization of isolates from foods and the food-processing environment are critical to properly identify and track the pathogen and quickly remove adulterated foods from the market. Prior methods can rely on time-consuming biochemical or sera-agglutination assays to perform these tasks. Development of a high-throughput method that would rapidly perform these tasks is critical to improve response to contamination events. Previously, a single laboratory validation of a qPCR-based method was presented that could rapidly verify Lm isolates and characterize them into six molecular serogroups. In the current study, a multi-laboratory validation (MLV) was performed to evaluate the reliability of the qPCR method for identification and serogrouping of Lm isolates. Sixteen collaborating laboratories independently analyzed a panel of 43 blinded isolates plus three control strains using the qPCR method. This panel was comprised of representatives for non-Listeria (n = 7), Listeria sp. (n = 8), and Lm (n = 28) strains. The Lm isolates contained representatives of the six serogroups: 2A, 2B, 2C, 4B, NT, and 4bV/IVb-v1, with five strains for each serogroup except 4bV/IVb-v1 (n = 3). The results generated by 16 laboratories showed high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, generally ≥97%, for both the genus-species and serogrouping qPCRs. Results from one laboratory lowered the sensitivity of the non-Listeria group to 93%. These results indicated the method was highly reliable. However, only the previously evaluated serogroups were tested within the MLV panel, though there is the potential for other serogroup results. Sequence Read Archive (SRA) files for Lm isolates were evaluated to determine the frequency of other potential serogroup profiles. This effort identified a low percentage of isolates with atypical qPCR serogroups (0.30%) that are consistent with Lm and were generally associated with lineage II and the natural environment. In summary, the results indicate that the proposed qPCR method is reliable and has a high degree of sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity, while also decreasing hands-on analysis time and increasing throughput of the analysis.

Multi-laboratory validation study of a real-time PCR method for detection of Salmonella in baby spinach.

The FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Salmonella culture method takes at least 3 days for a presumptive positive result. The FDA developed a quantitative PCR (qPCR) method to detect Salmonella from 24-h preenriched cultures, using ABI 7500 PCR system. The qPCR method has been evaluated as a rapid screening method for a broad range of foods by single laboratory validation (SLV) studies. The present multi-laboratory validation (MLV) study was aimed to measure the reproducibility of this qPCR method and compare its performance with the culture method. Sixteen laboratories participated in two rounds of MLV study to analyze twenty-four blind-coded baby spinach test portions each. The first round yielded ∼84% and ∼82% positive rates across laboratories for the qPCR and culture methods, respectively, which were both outside the fractional range (25%-75%) required for fractionally inoculated test portions by the FDA's Microbiological Method Validation Guidelines. The second round yielded ∼68% and ∼67% positive rates. The relative level of detection (RLOD) for the second-round study was 0.969, suggesting that qPCR and culture methods had similar sensitivity (p > 0.05). The study demonstrated that the qPCR yields reproducible results and is sufficiently sensitive and specific for the detection of Salmonella in food.

Multi-Laboratory Validation of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for Screening Salmonella in Animal Food.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has gained wide popularity in the detection of Salmonella in foods owing to its simplicity, rapidity, and robustness. This multi-laboratory validation (MLV) study aimed to validate a Salmonella LAMP-based method against the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method in a representative animal food matrix (dry dog food). Fourteen independent collaborators from seven laboratories in the United States and Canada participated in the study. Each collaborator received two sets of 24 blind-coded dry dog food samples (eight uninoculated; eight inoculated at a low level, 0.65 MPN/25 g; and eight inoculated at a high level, 3.01 MPN/25 g) and initiated the testing on the same day. The MLV study used an unpaired design where different test portions were analyzed by the LAMP and BAM methods using different preenrichment protocols (buffered peptone water for LAMP and lactose broth for BAM). All LAMP samples were confirmed by culture using the BAM method. BAM samples were also tested by LAMP following lactose broth preenrichment (paired samples). Statistical analysis was carried out by the probability of detection (POD) per AOAC guidelines and by a random intercept logistic regression model. Overall, no significant differences in POD between the Salmonella LAMP and BAM methods were observed with either unpaired or paired samples, indicating the methods were comparable. LAMP testing following preenrichment in buffered peptone water or lactose broth also resulted in insignificant POD differences (P > 0.05). The MLV study strongly supports the utility and applicability of this rapid and reliable LAMP method in routine regulatory screening of Salmonella in animal food.

Interlaboratory Validation for a Real-Time PCR Salmonella Detection Method Using the ABI 7500 FAST Real-Time PCR System.

Sixteen FERN (Food Emergency Response Network) member laboratories collaborated in this study to verify extension of the real-time PCR Salmonella detection method originally designed for the single-tube Cepheid SmartCycler II and validated against the Salmonella method of the U. S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual to the Applied Biosystems (ABI) 7500 FAST Real-Time PCR system multiwell plate platform. Four foods were selected for this study: chili powder, soft cheese, fish, and tomatoes; these foods represent products that are commonly analyzed for the presence of Salmonella for regulatory purposes. Each food consisted of six uninoculated control samples, six samples inoculated with low Salmonella levels (target 1 to 5 CFU/25 g), and six samples inoculated with high levels (target 10 to 50 CFU/25 g). All samples were tested for Salmonella using the 24-h quantitative PCR (qPCR) method for detecting Salmonella, which utilizes modified buffered peptone water as the sole enrichment medium and an internal control for the qPCR. Each of these 18 samples was individually analyzed for Salmonella by the collaborating laboratories using both the ABI 7500 FAST system (alternative method) and the SmartCycler II system (reference method). Statistical analysis of the data revealed no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) between these two qPCR platforms except for the chili powder samples. The differences noted with chili powder (P = 0.0455) were attributed to the enhanced sensitivity of the ABI 7500 FAST system compared with the SmartCycler II system. The detection limit of both qPCR methods was 0.02 to 0.15 CFU/g. These results provide a solid basis for extending the 24-h qPCR Salmonella method to the ABI 7500 FAST system for high-throughput detection of Salmonella in foods.

Investigation of Listeria, Salmonella, and toxigenic Escherichia coli in various pet foods.

The Veterinary Laboratory Investigation and Response Network (Vet-LIRN), in collaboration with the Food Emergency Response Network (FERN) and its Microbiology Cooperative Agreement Program (MCAP) laboratories, conducted a study to evaluate the prevalence of selected microbial organisms in various types of pet foods. The goal of this blinded study was to help the Center for Veterinary Medicine prioritize potential future pet food-testing efforts. The study also increased the FERN laboratories' screening capabilities for foodborne pathogens in animal feed matrices, since such pathogens may also be a significant health risk to consumers who come into contact with pet foods. Six U.S. Food and Drug Administration FERN MCAP laboratories analyzed approximately 1056 samples over 2 years. Laboratories tested for Salmonella, Listeria, Escherichia coli O157:H7 enterohemorrhagic E. coli, and Shiga toxin-producing strains of E. coli (STEC). Dry and semimoist dog and cat foods purchased from local stores were tested during Phase 1. Raw dog and cat foods, exotic animal feed, and jerky-type treats purchased through the Internet were tested in Phase 2. Of the 480 dry and semimoist samples, only 2 tested positive: 1 for Salmonella and 1 for Listeria greyii. However, of the 576 samples analyzed during Phase 2, 66 samples were positive for Listeria (32 of those were Listeria monocytogenes) and 15 samples positive for Salmonella. These pathogens were isolated from raw foods and jerky-type treats, not the exotic animal dry feeds. This study showed that raw pet foods may harbor food safety pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella. Consumers should handle these products carefully, being mindful of the potential risks to human and animal health.