Speech summer camp for treating articulation disorders in cleft palate patients.

INTRODUCTION: Compensatory articulation disorder (CAD) severely affects speech intelligibility of cleft palate children. CAD must be treated with speech therapy. Children can manage articulation better when they use language in event contexts such as every day routines. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to study and compare two modalities of speech intervention in cleft palate children with associated CAD. The first modality is a conventional approach providing speech therapy in 1-h sessions, twice a week. The second modality is a speech summer camp in which children received therapy 4h per day, 5 days a week for a period of 3 weeks. We were aimed to determine if a speech summer camp could significantly enhance articulation in CP children with CAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five children with repaired cleft palates who exhibited CAD were studied. A matched control group of 45 children with repaired cleft palate who also exhibited CAD were identified. The patients included in the first group attended a speech summer camp for 3 weeks. The matched control subjects included in the second group received speech therapy aimed to correct CAD twice per-week in 1-h sessions. RESULTS: At the onset of either the summer camp or the speech therapy period, the severity of CAD was evenly distributed with non-significant differences across both groups of patients (p > 0.05). After the summer camp (3 weeks) or 12 months of speech therapy sessions at a frequency of twice per-week, both groups of patients showed a significant decrease in the severity of their CAD (p < 0.05). However, when the distribution of the severity of CAD was compared at the end of the summer camp or the speech therapy period, non-significant differences were found between both groups of patients (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A speech summer camp is a valid and efficient method for providing speech therapy in cleft palate children with compensatory articulation disorder.

Velopharyngeal surgery: a prospective randomized study of pharyngeal flaps and sphincter pharyngoplasties.

Residual velopharyngeal insufficiency after palatal repair varies from 10 to 20 percent in most centers. Secondary velopharyngeal surgery to correct residual velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate is a topic frequently discussed in the medical literature. Several authors have reported that varying the operative approach according to the findings of videonasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy significantly improved the success of velopharyngeal surgery. This article compares two surgical techniques for correcting residual velopharyngeal insufficiency, namely pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty. Both techniques were carefully planned according to the findings of videonasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy. Fifty patients with cleft palate and residual velopharyngeal insufficiency were randomly divided into two groups: 25 in group 1 and 25 in group 2. Patients in group 1 were operated on by using a customized pharyngeal flap according to the findings of videonasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy in each case. Those in group 2 received a sphincter pharyngoplasty also customized according to the findings of videonasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy. The median age of the patients in both groups was not significantly different (p > 0.5). The frequency of residual velopharyngeal insufficiency after the individualized velopharyngeal surgery was not significantly different between the patient groups (12 percent versus 16 percent; p > 0.05). It seems that customized pharyngeal flaps and sphincter pharyngoplasties performed according to the findings of videonasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy are safe and reliable procedures for treating residual velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate patients.