Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Vestn Otorinolaringol ; 85(1): 74-78, 2020.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32241994

ABSTRACT

Allergic rhinitis, according to modern data, affects up to a quarter of the population of developed countries. The disease affects not only the nasal mucosa, but also affects the receptors and mediators of inflammation in the bone marrow. A significant decrease in the quality of life of patients against the background of exacerbation of allergic rhinitis makes us look for new approaches to both the treatment of attacks and their prevention. Correction, including surgical, of concomitant pathology of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses significantly improves the quality of life of patients with allergic rhinitis. For a long time, surgical treatment of concomitant pathology of the nasal cavity in children was extremely limited due to the risk of damage to the growth zones and, as a consequence, a high probability of recurrence of deformation of the structures of the nose and paranasal sinuses. With the development of endoscopic methods of surgical treatment of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, operations with minimal invasiveness and, as a consequence, safe at any age were introduced into practice. Surgical intervention on the structures of the lymphoid pharyngeal ring in children with allergic rhinitis is causing heated debate in the pediatric community to date. The article considers modern approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis in children. Topical problems of conservative and surgical treatment are discussed. Special attention is paid to the safety of various treatment regimens. The discussed practical issues of tactics of treatment of allergic rhinitis are relevant for both pediatric allergists and ENT pediatricians.


Subject(s)
Paranasal Sinuses , Rhinitis, Allergic , Child , Humans , Nasal Cavity , Nasal Mucosa , Quality of Life
2.
Eksp Klin Gastroenterol ; (1): 80-94, 2014.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25518462

ABSTRACT

Functional digestive disorders in infants comprise a group of disorders characterized by several specific features. They are related to structural and physiological peculiarities of the gastrointestinal tract in children during lactotrophic period of nutrition, limited pharmacotherapeutic options and supremacy of dietary correction in this age group, and psychological discomfort that has a negative impact on the quality of life of the whole family. The working protocol "Functional gastrointestinal disorders in infants' was prepared by the Russian Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (RusPGHAN) based on the previously proposed European (ESPGHAN) and American (NASPGHAN) guidelines. The protocol includes detailed description of the current approaches to diagnosis and management of the functional digestive disorders in young children, as well as algorithm tables that can be used by pediatricians and familial physicians in routine clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Diseases/diagnosis , Digestive System Diseases/therapy , Digestive System Physiological Phenomena , Colic/diagnosis , Colic/therapy , Constipation/diagnosis , Constipation/therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Infant , Practice Guidelines as Topic
3.
Klin Lab Diagn ; (4): 13-6, 2013 Apr.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23984547

ABSTRACT

The need in study and interpretation of eosinophilograms in children with allergic diseases is conditioned by higher rate of eosinophilia, large specter of morphologic and functional signs of eosinophils, dependence of indicators from character of clinical course of disease, presence of complications and schemes of treatment. The level of laboratory techniques applied in routine clinical practice to evaluate morphological and functional characteristics of eosinophils is not developed enough. The implementation of such modern high-tech techniques as computer morphometry, highly sensitive and highly specific modifications ELISA, which are applied to detect associated with eosinophilia cytokines, chemokines and growth factors make it possible to approach to this issue at the new qualitative level.


Subject(s)
Eosinophilia/blood , Eosinophils/pathology , Hypersensitivity/blood , Adolescent , Child , Cytokines/blood , Eosinophilia/complications , Eosinophilia/pathology , Eosinophils/metabolism , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/complications , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/pathology , Male
4.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 28(4): 623-42, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22455874

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of evidence supporting the safety profiles of frequently used oral H(1)-antihistamines (AHs) for the treatment of patients with histamine-release related allergic diseases, e.g. allergic rhinitis and urticaria, and to compare them to the safety profiles of other medications, mostly topical corticosteroids and leukotriene antagonists (LTRA). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Systematic search of the published literature (PubMed) and of the regulatory authorities databases (EMA and FDA) for oral AHs. RESULTS: Similarly to histamine, antihistamines (AHs) have organ-specific efficacy and adverse effects. The peripheral H(1)-receptor (PrH1R) stimulation leads to allergic symptoms while the brain H(1)-receptor (BrH1R) blockade leads to somnolence, fatigue, increased appetite, decreased cognitive functions (impaired memory and learning), seizures, aggressive behaviour, etc. First-generation oral AHs (FGAHs) inhibit the effects of histamine not only peripherally but also in the brain, and additionally have potent antimuscarinic, anti-α-adrenergic and antiserotonin effects leading to symptoms such as visual disturbances (mydriasis, photophobia, and diplopia), dry mouth, tachycardia, constipation, urinary retention, agitation, and confusion. The somnolence caused by FGAHs interferes with the natural circadian sleep-wake cycle and therefore FGAHs are not suitable to be used as sleeping pills. Second-generation oral AHs (SGAHs) have proven better safety and tolerability profiles, much lower proportional impairment ratios, with at least similar if not better efficacy, than their predecessors. Only SGAHs, and especially those with a proven long-term (e.g., ≥12 months) clinical safety, should be prescribed for young children. Evidence exist that intranasally applied medications, like intranasal antihistamines, have the potential to reach the brain and cause somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation oral antihistamines are the preferred first-line treatment option for allergic rhinitis and urticaria. Patients taking SGAHs report relatively little and mild adverse events even after long-term continuous treatments. An antihistamine should ideally possess high selectivity for the H(1)-receptor, high PrH1R occupancy and low to no BrH1R occupancy.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Histamine H1 Antagonists , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Leukotriene Antagonists , Safety , Administration, Oral , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypersensitivity/metabolism , Leukotriene Antagonists/adverse effects , Leukotriene Antagonists/therapeutic use
5.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 155(4): 367-78, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21346367

ABSTRACT

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) are highly burdensome diseases, which are increasing in prevalence, especially in the paediatric population. Despite the availability of a large number of medications for treatment of AR and CIU, their use in children has primarily been based on data obtained from a limited number of clinical trials in children and/or testing in adults. The H(1)-antihistamines have traditionally been used as first-line treatment for the relief of both AR and CIU symptoms in children. The first-generation H(1)-antihistamines are associated with marked adverse effects such as sedation, sleepiness/drowsiness as well as difficulties in learning and cognitive processing; thus, they are recommended for limited or discontinued use in children with AR or CIU. In contrast, second-generation H(1)-antihistamines are more adapted for the use in children with AR and CIU due to better safety profiles. However, only a limited number of trials with these agents have been conducted and generally, data from well-designed trials in children are lacking. Levocetirizine is one of the most extensively investigated H(1)-antihistamines for its pharmacologic properties, safety, efficacy as well as overall global satisfaction in children aged 2-12 years. Levocetirizine is the only H(1)-antihistamine launched in the 21st century shown to lack clinically relevant adverse effects on physical and psychomotor development or routine laboratory tests over a long-term period of 18 months in 1- to 3-year-old children predisposed to development of allergic disease. Available data suggest that levocetirizine is a suitable treatment option for AR and CIU in children aged 6 months to 12 years.


Subject(s)
Cetirizine , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating , Parents/psychology , Physicians/psychology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Urticaria/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-Allergic Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cetirizine/adverse effects , Cetirizine/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/adverse effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/therapeutic use , Humans , Infant , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/physiopathology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Urticaria/physiopathology
6.
Med Parazitol (Mosk) ; (3): 11-5, 2010.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20873373

ABSTRACT

The paper describes a rare manifestation of Blastocystis hominis infection in a 3-month-old baby with food allergy that appeared as atopic dermatitis and coloproctitis induced by food proteins (cow's milk, hen's egg). The fact that food allergy may be one of the predisposing factors in the development of clinical manifestations of B. hominis infection is discussed. The assumption that the amoeboid form of blastocysts accompanies the clinical manifestation of the infection is confirmed.


Subject(s)
Blastocystis Infections/diagnosis , Blastocystis hominis/isolation & purification , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Egg Hypersensitivity/complications , Eggs/adverse effects , Milk Hypersensitivity/complications , Milk/adverse effects , Proctocolitis/complications , Animals , Blastocystis Infections/complications , Chickens , Feces/parasitology , Humans , Infant , Male
7.
Klin Lab Diagn ; (11): 21-3, 2000 Nov.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11486741

ABSTRACT

The density and morphology of blood eosinophils from 60 children with atopic dermatitis were investigated. The proportion of hypodense eosinophils is higher during the acute stage of disease than during remission (59.78 +/- 0.20% vs. 21.40 +/- 0.04%).


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/blood , Eosinophilia/blood , Eosinophils/pathology , Cell Separation , Centrifugation, Density Gradient , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Eosinophilia/etiology , Humans
8.
Ter Arkh ; 70(9): 79-81, 1998.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9821236

ABSTRACT

AIM: To test the efficiency and tolerance of the second generation antihistamine drug ebastin (kestine) in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kestin was given for 3 weeks in doses 10 and 20 mg/day to 226 patients with SAR running for 6.8 +/- 6.1 years. SAR symptoms relief, subjective effects, side effects were studied. RESULTS: The total index of rhinitis symptoms diminished from 11.6 to 1.2 scores. Subjective response was registered in 82% of the patients, objective in 77%. Neither treatment aggravations nor serious side effects occurred. 2 patients had drowsiness, head aches, dizziness and discontinued treatment. CONCLUSION: Kestin is effective in SAR, had no serious side effects, is well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Butyrophenones/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Butyrophenones/administration & dosage , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...