[Analysis on the anatomic features of 47 cases of hepatic hydatidosis complicated with biliary fistula].

OBJECTIVE: To propose a criterion and its significance of clinical classification of hepatic hydatidosis complicated with biliary fistula. METHODS: 47 hepatic hydatidosis with biliary fistula cases who were given a subadventitial pericystectomy were observed from 2000 to 2005 in a retrospective study. The methods included observation of the different anatomic features of hepatic hydatidosis complicated with biliary fistula during the surgical operation and evaluation of the curative effect. RESULTS: All the 47 patients recuperated successfully and had no complication. Based on the anatomic features of hepatic hydatidosis complicated with biliary fistula, a criterion on clinical classification was proposed as three types: tangential, transfixional and terminal types. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic hydatidosis complicated with biliary fistula can be classified as three types according to its anatomic features.

[FDG dual-head tomography with coincidence imaging and serum tumor marker assays for the assessment of malignancy of pulmonary lesions].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of FDG dual-head tomography with coincidence (DHTC) imaging and serum tumor marker assays in identifying lung carcinoma in 160 patients with abnormal findings on chest radiography. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of FDG imaging with DHTC and the measurement of 3 serum tumor markers for lung cancer (carcinoembryonic antigen, CYFRA21-1 and neuron specific enolase) were performed in two weeks in 160 consecutive patients with known or suspected lung malignancy. All images were analyzed visually, and the count ratio of tumor to normal tissue (T/N ratio) was calculated. It was considered positive if the FDG uptake was increased relative to that in the adjacent lung tissue, and the uptake was focal and the T/N ratio > or = 1.3. The serum tumor marker test was considered positive for malignancy if the serum level of at least 1 marker was elevated. RESULTS: 127 patients were proven to have lung cancer by pathology, and 33 patients had benign lung disease. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG DHTC in assessing lung cancer were 94.5%, 84.8% and 92.5%, respectively, and those of the serum tumor markers were 67.7%, 84.8% and 71.3%, respectively. FDG DHTC showed significantly higher sensitivity (P < 0.001) and accuracy (P < 0.001) than serum tumor markers. Four patients with lung cancer had negative findings on FDG DHTC but had positive serum markers. CONCLUSION: FDG DHTC imaging is a powerful tool for evaluating patients with lung lesions suggestive of malignancy. Although the determination of serum tumor marker levels is less accurate than FDG DHTC, the combination of a positive FDG result and positive tumor markers may be helpful in improving the diagnosis of lung cancer.