Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy at a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for gastric cancer has gradually gained popularity. However, laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) has been reported rarely when compared with LDG. This study was designed to evaluate the surgical outcomes as well as the morbidity and mortality of LTG compared with LDG to confirm the feasibility and safety of LTG. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the data of patients at our institution undergoing LTG (n = 448) or LDG (n = 956) for gastric cancer between January 2008 and July 2016. Then the clinical characteristics and perioperative clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Except for tumor size and stage, there were no statistically significant differences in the clinicopathological parameters between the groups. LTG was associated with significantly longer operation time, late time to postoperative diet, and longer hospital stay compared with the LDG group. Overall complications developed in 60 patients (13.4%) and surgical complications in 48 patients (10.7%) after LTG. Postoperative complications were less frequent in the LDG group than in the LTG group (8.4% versus 13.4%, p < .01), and fewer surgical complications were observed with LDG than with LTG (7.5% versus 10.7%, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of LTG were favorable even though are not inferior to those of LDG. LTG for gastric cancer is technically feasible and safe. However, because of the limits of this study, other high-quality studies are needed for further evaluation.

Totally laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A case-matched study about short-term outcomes.

Although surgical outcomes of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) have been reported from several centers, the effectiveness of this technique has not been conclusively established. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TLTG for gastric cancer.A prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data were used by comparing the short-term surgical outcomes of 124 patients who underwent TLTG with those of 124 patients who underwent open total gastrectomy (OTG) between March 2007 and March 2016.The 2 groups were well matched with respect to age, sex, body mass index, ASA score, and tumor stage. There was no significant difference with regard to the operation time but TLTG showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss (115.5 ±â€Š70.2 vs 210.5 ±â€Š146.7 mL, P < .01). Total numbers of retrieved lymph nodes were similar in the 2 groups. Postoperatively, no significant differences were found for morbidity or mortality. The time to first flatus, initiate oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the TLTG group than in the OTG group (3.2 ±â€Š1.0 vs 4.1 ±â€Š1.2 days; 4.4 ±â€Š1.2 vs 5.6 ±â€Š2.0 days; and 8.9 ±â€Š3.1 vs 11.3 ±â€Š4.5 days, respectively; P < .01).TLTG for gastric cancer is technically safe, feasible, and minimally invasive compared with OTG. A prospective randomized trial is needed to establish the value of TLTG.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic local resection for gastric submucosal tumors: a single-center experience of 266 patients.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resections for submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the stomach have been developed rapidly over the past decade. Several types of laparoscopic methods for gastric SMTs have been created. We assessed the short-term outcomes of two commonly used types of laparoscopic local resection (LLR) for gastric SMTs and reported our findings. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological results of 266 patients with gastric SMTs whom underwent LLR between January 2006 and September 2016. 228 of these underwent laparoscopic exogastric wedge resection (LEWR), the remaining 38 patients with the tumors near the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) or antrum underwent laparoscopic transgastric resection (LTR). RESULTS: All the patients underwent laparoscopic resections successfully. The mean operation times of LEWR and LTR were 90.2 ± 37.2 min and 101.7 ± 38.5 min respectively. The postoperative length of hospital stays for LEWR and LTR were 5.1 ± 2.1 days and 5.3 ± 1.7 days respectively. There was a low complication rate (4.4%) and zero mortality in our series. CONCLUSION: ELWR is technically feasible therapy of gastric SMTs. LTR is secure and effective for gastric intraluminal SMTs located near the EGJ or antrum.

Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for upper gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy gained wide popularity in recent years. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy with intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (LTGIE) is much less performed. In this study, we reported our preliminary experience of LTGIE using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil). METHODS: Clinical data of patients with upper gastric cancer who underwent LTGIE from January 2016 to January 2017 were retrospectively collected. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery time of intestinal function, the length of hospitalization and postoperative complications were summarized and compared between early and later cases. RESULTS: There were totally 26 patients underwent LTGIE using OrVil successfully. The mean total operation time and esophagojejunostomy time was 272.8 min and 45.3 min. The mean estimated blood loss was 113.8 ml. The mean first flatus time was 3.1±0.9 days and the postoperative length of hospitalization (LOH) was 13.0±6.4 days. Three patients suffered postoperative complications, including one abdominal fluid collection, one pulmonary embolism and one pulmonary infection. During the follow-up period, neither local recurrence nor anastomosis-related morbidity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The LTGIE using OrVil is feasible and safe for upper gastric cancer. These preliminary results warrant further evaluation in a larger population to validate.

A new technique of mesh-reinforced pancreaticogastrostomy: report of 13 initial cases.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic anastomotic leakage is a common problem after pancreaticoduodenectomy and is a leading cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. It is important to establish a safe and simple technique of pancreatic-enteric anastomosis to minimize pancreatic leakage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2009 to February 2012, a new method of mesh-reinforced pancreaticogastrostomy was performed in 13 patients after completion of the pancreaticoduodenal resection. Patient demographic data, pathology of lesions, operative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 6.9 hours (range, 5-11 hours), and the mean time for pancreaticogastrostomy was 25 minutes (range, 22-35 minutes). Intraoperative tests showed all pancreatic anastomoses were watertight. There was no postoperative death. No patient developed clinically significant pancreatic leakage (grade B or C) after operation; 1 patient (7.7%) was recognized to have a grade A pancreatic leakage. No significant complication (hemorrhage, intra-abdominal abscess, or cholangitis) was observed. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 20 days (range, 11-30 days). After discharge, all patients recovered well in the 4-week follow-up period without emergency room visit or re-admission. CONCLUSIONS: The mesh-reinforced pancreaticogastrostomy provides a new way to perform pancreatic-enteric drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy and has the advantages of simplicity, ease of handling, and applicability to all types of pancreatic remnants.

[Application of bio-mesh-reinforced pancreatico-gastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of bio-mesh-reinforced pancreaticogastrostomy. METHODS: A total of 23 patients undergoing bio-mesh-reinforced pancreaticogastrostomy from May 2011 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Their demographic data, operative parameters and post-operative outcomes were recorded. The severity of pancreatic leak was determined according to the criteria of International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF). RESULTS: The mean anastomotic time was 24 (20-35) minutes. Intra-operative leak tests showed all pancreatic anastomoses were watertight. Six patients (26.1%) had pancreatic leakage of grade A. One patient (4.3%) had pancreatic leakage of grade B. No patient developed postoperative pancreatic leakage of class C. One case of abdominal infection was reported. No severe complications such as hemorrhage, bile leakage or gastrojejunostomy leakage were observed. All patients recovered well within Month 1 post-discharge. CONCLUSION: This novel technique may be a simple and feasible strategy for all types of pancreatic remnants.