ABSTRACT
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) is an endogenous inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and is highly expressed in breast cancer (BC) cases at diagnosis. However, the genetic investigations for the association of TIMP-2 genotypes with BC risk are rather limited. In this study, contribution of TIMP-2 rs8179090, rs4789936, rs2009196 and rs7342880 genotypes to BC risk was examined among Taiwan's BC population. TIMP-2 genotypic profiles were revealed among 1232 BC cases and 1232 controls about their contribution to BC using a PCR-based RFLP methodology. The TIMP-2 rs8179090 homozygous variant CC genotype was significantly higher in BC cases than controls (odds ratio (OR) = 2.76, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 1.78-4.28, p = 0.0001). Allelic analysis showed that C allele carriers have increased risk for BC (OR = 1.39, 95%CI = 1.20-1.62, p = 0.0001). Genotypic together with allelic analysis showed that TIMP-2 rs4789936, rs2009196 or rs7342880 were not associated with BC risk. Stratification analysis showed that TIMP-2 rs8179090 genotypes were significantly associated with BC risk among younger (≤55) aged women, not among those of an elder (>55) age. Last, rs8179090 genotypes were also associated with triple negative BC. This study sheds light into the etiology of BC in Taiwanese women. Rs8179090 may be incorporated into polygenic risk scores and risk prediction models, which could aid in stratifying individuals for targeted breast cancer screening.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is a critical protein in DNA repair, genomic stability, and carcinogenesis. Functional polymorphisms in FEN1 promoter -69G>A (rs174538) and 3'UTR 4150G>T (rs4246215), have been associated with the susceptibility to several cancers, including lung, breast, esophageal, gastric, liver, colorectal, and gallbladder cancer, as well as glioma, endometriosis, and leukemia. However, the contribution of FEN1 variant genotypes to oral cancer has never been examined. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the contribution of FEN1 rs174538 and rs4246215 genotypes to oral cancer risk in Taiwan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The contribution of FEN1 genotypes to oral cancer risk was examined in 958 oral cancer patients and 958 age- and sex-matched healthy controls by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). RESULTS: The percentages of GG, AG, and AA genotypes at FEN1 rs174538 were 34.8%, 46.0%, and 19.2% among oral cancer patients and 37.8%, 45.2%, and 17.0% among healthy controls (p for trend=0.2788). The genotypic percentages of FEN1 rs4246215 were 35.9%, 45.9%, and 18.2% among oral cancer patients and 37.6%, 45.1%, and 17.3% among healthy controls (p for trend=0.7315). Overall, FEN1 rs174538 and rs4246215 were not differently distributed between the oral cancer patient and healthy control groups. The allele frequency analysis confirmed that FEN1 rs174538 and rs4246215 were non-differentially distributed among case and control groups (OR=1.11 and 1.05, 95%CI=0.98-1.27 and 0.93-1.20, p=0.1074 and 0.4491, respectively). CONCLUSION: FEN1 may contribute to oral cancer risk determination via protein expression and/or post-transcription modification, but may not be a practical genetic marker.
