Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sleep ; 29(3): 375-80, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16553024

ABSTRACT

Positive airway pressure (PAP) devices are used to treat patients with sleep related breathing disorders (SRBD) including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Currently, PAP devices come in three forms: (1) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), (2) bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP), and (3) automatic self-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP). After a patient is diagnosed with OSA, the current standard of practice involves performing full, attended polysomnography during which positive pressure is adjusted to determine optimal pressure for maintaining airway patency. This titration is used to find a fixed single pressure for subsequent nightly usage. A task force of the Standards of Practice Committee of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine reviewed the available literature. Based on this review, the Standards of Practice Committee developed these practice parameters as a guideline for using CPAP and BPAP appropriately (an earlier review and practice parameters for APAP was published in 2002). Major conclusions and current recommendations are as follows: 1) A diagnosis of OSA must be established by an acceptable method. 2) CPAP is effective for treating OSA. 3) Full-night, attended studies performed in the laboratory are the preferred approach for titration to determine optimal pressure; however, split-night, diagnostic-titration studies are usually adequate. 4) CPAP usage should be monitored objectively to help assure utilization. 5) Initial CPAP follow-up is recommended during the first few weeks to establish utilization pattern and provide remediation if needed. 6) Longer-term follow-up is recommended yearly or as needed to address mask, machine, or usage problems. 7) Heated humidification and a systematic educational program are recommended to improve CPAP utilization. 8) Some functional outcomes such as subjective sleepiness improve with positive pressure treatment in patients with OSA. 9) CPAP and BPAP therapy are safe; side effects and adverse events are mainly minor and reversible. 10) BPAP may be useful in treating some forms of restrictive lung disease or hypoventilation syndromes associated with hypercapnia.


Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/therapy , Adult , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/instrumentation , Humans , Polysomnography , Positive-Pressure Respiration/instrumentation , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy
2.
Sleep ; 29(2): 240-3, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16494092

ABSTRACT

These practice parameters are an update of the previously published recommendations regarding use of oral appliances in the treatment of snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Oral appliances (OAs) are indicated for use in patients with mild to moderate OSA who prefer them to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, or who do not respond to, are not appropriate candidates for, or who fail treatment attempts with CPAP. Until there is higher quality evidence to suggest efficacy, CPAP is indicated whenever possible for patients with severe OSA before considering OAs. Oral appliances should be fitted by qualified dental personnel who are trained and experienced in the overall care of oral health, the temporomandibular joint, dental occlusion and associated oral structures. Follow-up polysomnography or an attended cardiorespiratory (Type 3) sleep study is needed to verify efficacy, and may be needed when symptoms of OSA worsen or recur. Patients with OSA who are treated with oral appliances should return for follow-up office visits with the dental specialist at regular intervals to monitor patient adherence, evaluate device deterioration or maladjustment, and to evaluate the health of the oral structures and integrity of the occlusion. Regular follow up is also needed to assess the patient for signs and symptoms of worsening OSA. Research to define patient characteristics more clearly for OA acceptance, success, and adherence is needed.


Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/instrumentation , Orthodontic Appliances, Removable , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Snoring/epidemiology , Snoring/therapy , Equipment Design , Humans , Polysomnography , Prosthesis Fitting , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis
3.
Sleep ; 28(4): 499-521, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16171294

ABSTRACT

These practice parameters are an update of the previously-published recommendations regarding the indications for polysomnography and related procedures in the diagnosis of sleep disorders. Diagnostic categories include the following: sleep related breathing disorders, other respiratory disorders, narcolepsy, parasomnias, sleep related seizure disorders, restless legs syndrome, periodic limb movement sleep disorder, depression with insomnia, and circadian rhythm sleep disorders. Polysomnography is routinely indicated for the diagnosis of sleep related breathing disorders; for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration in patients with sleep related breathing disorders; for the assessment of treatment results in some cases; with a multiple sleep latency test in the evaluation of suspected narcolepsy; in evaluating sleep related behaviors that are violent or otherwise potentially injurious to the patient or others; and in certain atypical or unusual parasomnias. Polysomnography may be indicated in patients with neuromuscular disorders and sleep related symptoms; to assist in the diagnosis of paroxysmal arousals or other sleep disruptions thought to be seizure related; in a presumed parasomnia or sleep related seizure disorder that does not respond to conventional therapy; or when there is a strong clinical suspicion of periodic limb movement sleep disorder. Polysomnography is not routinely indicated to diagnose chronic lung disease; in cases of typical, uncomplicated, and noninjurious parasomnias when the diagnosis is clearly delineated; for patients with seizures who have no specific complaints consistent with a sleep disorder; to diagnose or treat restless legs syndrome; for the diagnosis of circadian rhythm sleep disorders; or to establish a diagnosis of depression.


Subject(s)
Polysomnography/methods , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/therapy , Sleep Wake Disorders/diagnosis , Chronobiology Disorders/diagnosis , Chronobiology Disorders/physiopathology , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Humans , Narcolepsy/diagnosis , Narcolepsy/physiopathology , Nocturnal Myoclonus Syndrome/diagnosis , Nocturnal Myoclonus Syndrome/physiopathology , Restless Legs Syndrome/diagnosis , Restless Legs Syndrome/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/physiopathology , Sleep Arousal Disorders/diagnosis , Sleep Arousal Disorders/physiopathology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/diagnosis , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/physiopathology , Sleep Wake Disorders/physiopathology , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...