A randomized trial of intensive versus minimal surveillance of patients with resected Dukes B2-C colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common and the third most lethal cancer in both men and women in developed countries. About 75% of cases are first diagnosed when the disease is classified as localized or regional, undergo potentially curative treatment and enter a post-treatment surveillance program. Although such programs drain significant resources from health systems, empirical evidence of their efficacy is scanty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dukes B2-C colorectal cancer patients who had no evidence of disease at the end of their front-line treatment (surgery and adjuvant radiochemotherapy, if indicated) were eligible for the trial and randomized to two different surveillance programs. These programs differed greatly in the frequency of diagnostic imaging. They had similar schedules of physical examinations and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assessments. Patients received baseline and yearly health-related quality-of-life (HR-QoL) questionnaires. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and QoL. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2006, 1228 assessable patients were randomized, 933 with colon cancer and 295 with rectal cancer. More than 90% of patients had the expected number of diagnostic procedures. Median follow-up duration was 62 months [interquartile range (IQR) 51-86] in the minimal surveillance group and 62 months (IQR 50-85) in the intensive group. At primary analysis, 250 patients had recurred and 218 had died. Intensive surveillance anticipated recurrence, as shown by a significant difference in mean disease-free survival of 5.9 months. Comparison of OS curves of the whole intention-to-treat population showed no statistically significant differences. HR-QoL of life scores did not differ between regimens. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the conclusions of other randomized clinical trials, which show that early diagnosis of cancer recurrence is not associated with OS benefit. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT02409472.

Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy: a well-tolerated but ineffective chemotherapeutic regimen in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. A report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

BACKGROUND: This phase II study was initiated to determine the activity and toxicity of a combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CDDP 35 mg/m(2) was given as a 30-min infusion and GEM 1000 mg/m(2) as a 30-min infusion. Both drugs were administered once weekly for 2 consecutive weeks out of every 3 weeks to chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: Forty-five advanced pancreatic cancer patients received this regimen for a total of 180 cycles of chemotherapy. One complete and four partial responses have been observed for an overall response rate of 9% (95% confidence interval 10% to 11%). Twenty-one patients (46%) had stable disease and 19 progressed on therapy. The median time to progression was 3.6 months, with a median survival of 5.6 months. A clinical benefit was obtained in nine of 37 patients (24%). Side-effects were mainly represented by hematological toxicity. Grade 3/4 WHO toxicities included neutropenia (6% of the patients) and thrombocytopenia (11%). The dose of GEM and CDDP was reduced in 14 patients (31%) and treatment was delayed in 10 patients (22%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results in terms of response rate, clinical benefit and survival do not support an advantage for the combination of GEM and CDDP given by this schedule.

The value of oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusion +/- bolus 5-fluorouracil and levo-folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing after 5FU-based chemotherapy: a GISCAD (Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract) cancer phase II trial.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The phase II trial was designed to evaluate the activity of combined oxaliplatin (L-OHP), continuous infusion (CI) +/- bolus 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and levo-folinic acid (I-FA) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer progressing after one or more lines of 5FU-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed two contemporary studies: in the former we enrolled patients previously treated with 1 line of chemotherapy, and in the latter, patients previously treated with 2, 3 and 4 lines. Seventy-six consecutive patients were enrolled: 45 received L-OHP (85 mg/m2 i.v. 2 h on day 1) + I-FA (100 mg/m2 i.v. 2 h on days 1 and 2) + 5FU i.v. bolus (400 mg/m2 days 1 and 2) + 5FU (600 mg/m2 CI 22 h days 1 and 2 (FOLFOX 4); 31 received L-OHP (100 mg/m2 i.v. 2 h on day 1) + I-FA (250 mg/m2 i.v. 2 h on days 1 and 2), followed by 5FU (1500 mg/m2 Cl 24 h days 1 and 2 (FOLFOX 2). The treatment was recycled every 2 weeks and continued until progression and/or unacceptable toxicity or patient preference. The primary end point was activity (tumor growth control [TGC]: partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD]); the secondary end points were time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-five patients in 2nd line (22 FOLFOX 4, 23 FOLFOX 2), 23 (17 FOLFOX 4, 6 FOLFOX 2) in 3rd, 4 in 4th and 1 in 5th line were assessable; 3 were lost to follow-up. In 15 patients (11 FOLFOX 4, 4 FOLFOX 2), disease involved the liver only. A total of 533 courses were administered with a range of 1-14 in FOLFOX4 and 1-12 in FOLFOX2; dose intensity was 92.85%, and the total dose of the administered L-OHP was 98.29%. As a 2nd line treatment, FOLFOX 4 achieved TGC in 72.8% of the patients (PR, 18.2%; SD, 54.6%), with a median TTP of 6 months and a median OS of 7 months, whereas in the FOLFOX 2 group these figures were 78.3% (PR 21.8%, SD 56.5%), and 5 and 9 months. As a 3rd line treatment, FOLFOX 4 produced TGC in 41.1% of patients (PR 23.5%, SD 17.6%), with a median TTP of 5 months and median OS of 7+ months, whereas FOLFOX 2 obtained respective values of 50% (PR 16.7%, SD 33.3%), 7 and 9 months. As a 4th line of treatment, TGC was achieved in 2 patients (1 PR, 1 SD); the patient in 5th line therapy obtained a SD. With "de Gramont" as the first-line regimen, patients assessable were 24 in FOLFOX 4 and 18 in FOLFOX 2. In the former population, TGC was 70.8% (PR 37.5%, SD 33.3%), with a TTP of 6 months and OS of 10 months, whereas with FOLFOX2 these values were 61.1% (PR 5.6%, SD 55.5), 5 and 7 months. In patients with liver involvement only, FOLFOX 4 obtained TGC in 63.6% of cases (with a TTP of 7 months and OS of 6+ months), FOLFOX 2 in 100% (with a TTP of 9.5 months and OS of 13.5+ months). Both schedules exhibited an acceptable toxicity: neurologic, hematologic and hepatic grade 3 side effects occurred in a limited number of patients, with a higher frequency in the FOLFOX 2 group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with L-OHP, CI +/- bolus 5FU and I-FA was well tolerated. The activity in terms of TGC was interesting and comparable with results reported in the literature for the standard treatment for 2nd line, i.e. irinotecan alone. Treatment was effective in 2nd line and in patients previously treated with more than two chemotherapy lines; in particular, treatment was active in patients with hepatic disease only. Although the two schedules seemed to achieve the same benefit with the same tolerance, we could not define from the study the better regime.

A combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

In a randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine (GEM) was more effective than 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. GEM and 5-FU have different mechanisms of action and their combination, from a theoretical point of view, could result in a higher activity. To test activity and feasibility of such a combination, a multi-institutional phase II study was initiated in November 1996 by the Italian Group for the study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD). Primary objectives of this study were to determine the activity in terms of response rate and clinical benefit, while the secondary objective was toxicity. According to the optimal two-stage phase II design, 54 patients were enrolled. Schedule was: GEM 1000 mg m(-2) intravenous (i.v.), and 5-FU 600 mg m(-2) bolus i.v. weekly for 3 weeks out of every 4. All the 54 patients were symptomatic (pain, weight loss, dyspepsia). A clinical benefit was obtained in 28 patients (51%) (95% confidence interval (CI) 38-64%). Two patients achieved a partial response and 34 a stable disease. Median survival for all the patients was 7 months. Side-effects were mild: no gastrointestinal or haematological grade 3-4 toxicity (WHO) were recorded. We observed only six episodes of grade 2 (WHO) leukopenia and seven episodes of thrombocytopenia. Although the non-randomized design of this study suggests caution in the interpretation of these data, in consideration of the low incidence of toxicity and the favourable results obtained in terms of clinical benefit, it may be worthwhile to test more active schedules of 5-FU (continuous infusion) in combination with gemcitabine.

A phase I-II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and docetaxel have been claimed to be active single agents in advanced pancreatic cancer. We determined the maximum tolerable dose of docetaxel combined with a weekly fixed dose of gemcitabine and assessed the activity of this combination in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase I. Patients were treated with gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, every three weeks, at a fixed dose of 1,000 mg/m2; docetaxel was given at escalating doses starting from 70 mg/m2 on day 8. Phase II. In accord with the optimal two-stage phase II study design, 18 patients were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and the maximum tolerable dose of docetaxel (70 mg/m2). RESULTS: Phase I. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the second dose level of docetaxel (80 mg/m2), with all three patients developing grades 3 or 4 neutropenia. Consequently, the dose tested in the phase II study was 70 mg/m2. Phase II. In the 18 patients enrolled in the study, we registered only one partial response. The time to progression was 3 months, and the median treatment survival was 5.4 months. Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of neutropenia (three episodes) and thrombocytopenia (two episodes). Furthermore, 10 patients complained of grade 3 fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of docetaxel to gemcitabine does not appear to be useful in advanced pancreatic cancer, since gemcitabine alone achieves similar results.

Intensive weekly chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer using 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione and filgrastim: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

Local extension prevents curative resection in more than two-thirds of gastric cancer patients. Unfortunately, resectability is one of the main prognostic factors in these patients, and survival is longer when tumours are completely removed. Preoperative chemotherapy is an attractive concept for obtaining curative resection. Thirty-two locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer patients were enrolled in five Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD) centres. For 16 patients, surgical unresectability was based on computerized tomography scan evaluation of tumour size (four patients) and invasion of adjacent structures (12 patients), whereas in another 16 patients locally advanced disease was confirmed by laparotomy. They received weekly administration of cisplatin 40 mg m(-2), 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), epidoxorubicin 35 mg m(-2), 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg m(-2) and glutathione 1.5 g m(-2). From the day after to the day before each chemotherapy administration, filgrastim was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 microg kg(-1). One cycle of therapy consisted of eight weekly treatments. Fifteen of 32 patients (47%) responded to chemotherapy, whereas 13 (41 %) had stable disease and four (12%) progressed on therapy. Of the 15 responding patients, 13 were completely resected after chemotherapy and two of them had a complete pathological response. Two clinically responding patients were found unresectable at operation because of peritoneal seeding. At a median follow-up from the start of treatment of 24 months (range 11-39 months), 10 of 13 resected patients are alive and eight are relapse free. Three patients died after 11, 12, and 14 months respectively. Toxicity was acceptable: side-effects consisted mainly of grade II National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCICTC) leucopenia and thrombocytopenia in ten patients. Neither treatment-related death nor surgical complications in patients undergoing surgery were observed. This weekly intensive regimen enabled resection in half of previously inoperable tumours with a moderate toxicity. It can be offered to patients with locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer to obtain curative resection.

Intensive weekly chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer using fluorouracil, cisplatin, epi-doxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgrastim: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer.

PURPOSE: A multiinstitutional trial was performed to confirm the clinical activity, in terms of response rate and toxicity (primary objectives) and duration of responses and survival (secondary objectives), of an intensive weekly regimen in advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma received 1-day per week administration of cisplatin (CDDP) 40 mg/m2, fluorouracil (5FU) 500 mg/m2, epi-doxorubicin (epi-ADR) 35 mg/m2, 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg/m2, and glutathione 1.5 g/m2. On the other days, filgrastim was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 mg/kg. One cycle of therapy consisted of eight 1-week treatments. Patients who showed a response or stable disease received a further 6 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Of 105 enrolled patients, 11 had locally advanced unresectable disease only; 33 had primary nonresected and metastatic disease; 48 had metastatic disease and primary tumor resected; 10 had locoregional recurrence and metastatic disease; and three had locoregional recurrence only. After one cycle, 18 complete responses (CRs) and 47 partial responses (PRs) were achieved, for an overall response rate of 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53% to 71%). Twenty patients had stable disease and 20 progressed on therapy. The median survival duration of all 105 patients was 11 months, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 42% and 5%, respectively. World Health Organization (WHO) grade III to IV toxicity, in terms of anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and mucositis, was experienced by 40 patients (38%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: These data support the results of the pilot study and confirmed the high activity of the regimen, with acceptable toxicity. This schedule deserves evaluation in the adjuvant setting.

High-versus low-dose levo-leucovorin as a modulator of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a 'GISCAD' phase III study. Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although leucovorin (LV) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered the treatment of choice for advanced colorectal cancer in most countries, the optimal schedule of this combination has not yet been established. Low-dose LV appears to be as active as high-dose LV in the daily-times-five regimen, but no randomized study of the levorotatory stereoisomer (6S-LV) given at two different dose levels has been published. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1991 and June 1994, 422 patients (all with measurable disease previously untreated with chemotherapy) were randomized to 6S-LV (100 mg/sqm/i.v.) + 5-FU (370 mg sqm/15 min i.v. infusion), both administered for 5 days every 28 days (arm A), or to 6S-LV (10 mg/sqm/i.v./5-FU (doses as above), also given for 5 days every 28 days (arm B). The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of response rates (WHO criteria): the secondary endpoint was the assessment of survival and tolerability. No evaluation of the quality of life or the symptomatic effect of treatment was planned. RESULTS: The response rate was 9.3% in arm A (95% CI: 5.4-13.1), with 2 CR and 18 PR, and 10.7% in arm B (95% CI: 6.5-14.9), with 3 CR + 19 PR, without any significant difference (P = 0.78). The median time to progression was eight months in both groups and overall survival was 11 months, with no difference between treatments. Toxicity mainly consisted of gastrointestinal side effects (mucositis and diarrhoea), which were rarely severe (grade 3-4: 5%-10% of patients) and similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale multicentre trial, the low and high doses of 6S-LV appeared to be equivalent in terms of the biochemical modulation of 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer although, for several reasons (including the timing and the strict criteria of response evaluation, the high number of patients with unfavourable prognostic factors, the multi-institutional nature of the study, the dose and modality of 5-FU administration), the response rate was lower than that reported in some of the other published studies. Given the considerable difference in economic cost between the two dosages, the use of high-dose 6S-LV in the daily-times-five regimen is not recommended in clinical practice.

Factors influencing response rates for advanced colorectal cancer chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The activity of various chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer is assessed by different groups of investigators and in various trials by what appear to be common criteria. However, there may be substantial inter-trial variation in the interpretation and application of these criteria which contributes to differences in response rates reported for the same regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This paper reviews the most prominent studies in this field and examines the factors which may influence the assessment of activity in clinical trials such as patient selection, the definition and application of response criteria, the methods of assessment of time to progression and duration of response, factors related to the therapeutic regimen and statistical methods. Each factor is critically discussed. RESULTS: The analysis confirms that there is a large variability among the different studies and that an inter-trial comparison is often impossible, with subsequent difficulties for clinicians in determining the true impact of therapies. DISCUSSION: After briefly commenting on the various issues, this review makes recommendations about how to achieve consistency among trials, for instance by using standard criteria, by extending the use of randomization even in phase II trials and by evaluating high quality, well conducted clinical trials in a meta-analysis, thereby making possible comparison across trials. The conclusions, although specific to colorectal cancer, are also applicable to other advanced malignancies.

[Locoregional chemotherapy of liver metastasis from colorectal carcinoma]. / Chemioterapia locoregionale delle metastasi epatiche da carcinoma del colon-retto.

Hepatic metastases are a major cause of death in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Traditional intravenous chemotherapy produces responses in 10% to 30% of patients and surgical resection is feasible in approximately 20% of patients. Infusion of cytotoxic agents into the hepatic artery is the most promising form of therapy for unresectable hepatic metastases. The recent development of a totally implantable pump has allowed prolonged infusion of chemotherapeutic agents with a good compliance and quality of life of the patients. The rationale for hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) present an anatomical and pharmacological basis with the use of agents with high hepatic extraction resulting in minimal systemic toxicity. The results of eight randomized trial assessing the value of HAI Floxuridine shows that such regional chemotherapy increases the likelihood of hepatic response compared with systemic treatment (52% vs 15%). Survival information is difficult to evaluate because some of the studies are small, some had a crossover design and some others had bias factors. Extrahepatic disease develops in 40-70% of patients undergoing HAI; the use of systemic therapy plus HAI may produce a decrease in extrahepatic disease. Further studies of combined systemic/arterial regiment are necessary.

Epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil is an active and safe regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer. An Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD) report.

BACKGROUND: A Phase II confirmatory multicenter trial was performed to evaluate a combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ECF) in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with locally advanced (n = 7) or metastatic (n = 46) gastric cancer received a dose of epirubicin (50 mg/m2) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) intravenously every 21 days for eight cycles with 5-fluorouracil (200 mg/m2/day) by intravenous continuous infusion for 21 consecutive weeks, administered through a central line using an external pump. RESULTS: Eight complete responses and 22 partial responses (response rate = 56%, 95% confidence interval +/- 13) were achieved. Twelve patients had stable disease. The median duration of response was 10 months (range, 3-21 months), and the median survival for all the patients was 9+ months (range, 2-28 months). Overall toxicity, which was primarily hematologic, was mild with only three patients requiring hospitalization for neutropenic fever. No death due to toxicity occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the ECF regimen is substantially active in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer and has a favorable pattern of toxicity. This schedule clearly deserves randomized comparative trials for palliation of metastatic disease and for adjuvant purposes.

Oral etoposide as second-line chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a GISCAD study. Gruppo Italiano Studio Carcinomi Apparato Digerente.

Twenty-one patients with advanced colorectal cancer, all previously pretreated with a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen, received oral etoposide: 100 mg/die for 21 consecutive days, every three weeks. No objective response was achieved; 6 pts had a short-lasting stabilization of their disease. Toxicity was substantial and mainly represented by myelosuppression and alopecia. Protracted administration of etoposide is inactive as second-line treatment of colorectal cancer.

[The evolution of the liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma treated with hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy. The echographic and CT aspects]. / Evoluzione delle metastasi epatiche da carcinoma del colon-retto trattate con chemioterapia intra-arteriosa epatica. Aspetti ecografici e tomodensitometrici.

The response of liver metastases to chemotherapy relies mainly on quantitative US and CT investigations, the two techniques being indifferently used. The morphologic changes of metastatic lesions during treatment have received little attention and their significance is still questionable. Based on the review of 53 US and 41 CT examinations of 15 patients treated with hepatic arterial chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastasis, our study was aimed at assessing: 1) the relationship between US and CT measurements of metastasis response to chemotherapy and 2) changes in the US and CT patterns of liver metastases during treatment and the existence of specific patterns of favorable response to chemotherapy or of disease progression. We concluded that: 1) as to quantitative response to chemotherapy, US and CT, performed on 13 patients within 1 month, were in agreement in all but 1 case, 2) US and CT patterns of treated liver metastases were different in case of favorable response and of disease progression; lesion outline, homogeneity and calcifications are useful diagnostic criteria to this purpose, 3) liver perfusion abnormalities may occur at various times during and after chemotherapy; these ischemic lesions must be differentiated from new metastases.

Double modulation of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer with low-dose interferon-alpha 2b and folinic acid. The "GISCAD" experience. Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer.

In advanced colorectal cancer the addition of folinic acid (FA) has been shown to lead to increased activity, at least in terms of response rate, in comparison with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) alone. Similarly, interferon-alpha (IFN) is able to potentiate 5FU, although high doses cause heavy toxicity. Given the different mechanisms of action of the two agents, the double modulation of 5FU deserves clinical evaluation. In a multicenter study (involving both primary care and referral institutions) 63 patients with advanced colorectal cancer, previously untreated with chemotherapy, received, in an outpatient setting, FA (200 mg/m2 i.v. bolus) + 5FU (400 mg/m2 i.v. in 15 min) for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks + IFN 3 x 10(6) U on alternate days, starting 1 week before chemotherapy. During the 5 days of 5FU + FA, IFN was administered daily. The antitumour activity, the impact on response duration and survival and toxicity of the combination were evaluated according to WHO criteria. Of the 63 enrolled patients, 56 were evaluable: there were 2 complete responses (3%) and 13 partial responses (21%), giving an objective response rate of 24% (95% confidence interval 13-35%); no change was observed in 17 cases and progressive disease in 24. Median duration of response was 9 months and median survival (all patients) 13 months. Toxicity was acceptable, even though 4 patients presented reversible grade 4 side-effects (2 mucositis and 2 diarrhoea). With this schedule and these doses, addition of IFN did not lead to any increase in the activity of 5FU + FA. In colorectal cancer, further clinical studies with these drugs should be based on a deeper experimental knowledge of their mechanisms of interaction.

Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and the natural l isomer of folinic acid in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Between February 1991 and July 1992, 79 previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were enrolled in a phase II study of combined 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and l-folinic acid (FA). 5-FU 370 mg/m2/day was administered for 5 consecutive days as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus injection preceded by l-FA 100 mg/m2/day with the same administration modality. Treatment was given every 4 weeks until progression. 79 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 64 for response. 2 patients (3%) achieved a complete remission and 8 (12.5%) a partial remission, 33 (52%) had stable disease and 21 patients (33%) had progressive disease. Median duration of remission was 32.5 weeks and median survival for all evaluable patients was 64.5 weeks. Substantial to severe side-effects occurred in 39% of patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3-4) was mainly diarrhoea (18%) and mucositis (15%). Nausea/vomiting, cutaneous toxicity, leucopenia, alopecia and conjunctivitis of grade 3-4 occurred respectively in 6, 4, 2.5, 1 and 1% of cases. Toxicity appeared to be substantially similar to that characteristic of combined 5-FU and the chiral mixture of d,l-FA. Efficacy was within the range of that observed with the 5-FU/d,l-FA combination, although at the lower level.