Urine concentrations of vilanterol and its metabolites, GSK932009 and GW630200, after inhalation of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses.

The 2023 Prohibited List issued by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) permits athletes to inhale the beta2 -agonist vilanterol at a standard dose of 25 µg daily. However, given limited data on urine pharmacokinetics, vilanterol has no urinary threshold or decision limit to discriminate therapeutic from supratherapeutic use. We investigated urine concentrations of vilanterol and its main metabolites GSK932009 and GW630200 over 0-72 h following inhalation of therapeutic (25 µg) or supratherapeutic (100 µg) doses and repeat-dose administration for 7 days of 25 or 100 µg·day-1 in 25 trained men and women. Vilanterol administration was followed by 1 h of exercise. GW630200 urine concentrations were low and insufficient for threshold purposes, and while GSK932009 had higher urine concentrations, it could not discriminate between therapeutic and supratherapeutic use. Mean (range) maximum urine concentrations of parent vilanterol were 1.2 (0.2-4.1) and 6.2 (1.4-14.3) ng·ml-1 for single-dose 25 and 100 µg vilanterol, respectively, and 2.0 (0.3-4.8) and 22.4 (6.4-42.1) ng·ml-1 for repeat-dose 25 and 100 µg·day-1 vilanterol. In 333 samples collected 6 h post-administration and considering WADA TD2022DL, a 3.1 ng·ml-1 vilanterol cut-off showed 30% sensitivity in detecting supratherapeutic use at 100 µg versus therapeutic use at 25 µg. Considering inter- and intra-individual variability and guard bands in doping analysis, a 6 ng·ml-1 decision limit, which could be shifted upwards in samples with specific gravity >1.018, appears sufficiently high to minimize risk of samples exceeding the decision limit after therapeutic use of vilanterol, while demonstrating the ability to detect supratherapeutic use at 100 µg.

Assay validation for vilanterol and its metabolites in human urine with application for doping control analysis.

A bioanalytical method for detecting the ultra-long-acting beta2 -agonist (U-LABA) inhaled vilanterol and its metabolites, GSK932009 and GW630200, in urine was developed to potentially monitor permitted therapeutic versus prohibited supratherapeutic use in sport. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has established urinary concentration thresholds for the beta2 -agonists salbutamol and formoterol. Therapeutic use of vilanterol (25 µg once daily) was recently permitted by WADA; however, there is no established decision limit for adverse analytical findings due to insufficient urine concentration data. In this study, we validated an assay to detect vilanterol in urine collected from four healthy male and female athletes 0-72 h who received inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate/U-LABA vilanterol (800/100 µg) combination, four times the normal therapeutic dose. After administration, subjects performed 1 h of bike ergometer exercise. The experiment was conducted again after repeat dosing for 1 week. Our method utilised liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and was validated over urine concentrations of 5-5000 (vilanterol) and 50-50,000 pg/ml (GSK932009 and GW630200). Plasma samples were analysed for vilanterol, using a previously validated assay. The peak concentration values for urine vilanterol, GSK932009 and GW630200 were 9.5, 10.4 and 0.17 ng/ml, for single dosing, and 18.6, 19.5 and 0.20 ng/ml, for repeat dosing. Urine samples from four volunteers using the final validated method are reported, demonstrating this assay has sensitivity to detect vilanterol or GSK932009 in urine for ≥72 h post single or repeat dosing with 800/100 µg fluticasone furoate/vilanterol, whereas GW630200 was quantifiable ≤4 h post dose.

Ensuring the collection of high-quality dried blood spot samples across multisite clinical studies.

AIM: The quality of quantitative analytical measurements is dependent on the quality of the sample collected, and dried blood spots (DBS) are no exception. As the use of DBS has matured into late-stage clinical drug-development studies, it has become apparent that a simple and straightforward approach in a controlled single-site, first-time-into-human clinic, does not always translate into multicenter clinical studies. Using synthetic blood, a method of training and assessing clinical laboratory staff has been developed to ensure the quality of sampling. METHODS: A test kit comprising of synthetic blood, a pipetting aid, blank blood spot card, drying rack and training manual was sent to each clinical site for each technician to assess and approve prior to spotting PK samples. RESULTS: The development of a DBS training kit along with a step-by-step guide has been successfully implemented. CONCLUSION: The training kit has been 100% successful across three large multisite clinical studies.