Effect of a milk formula containing probiotics on the fecal microbiota of asian infants at risk of atopic diseases.

The fecal microbiota of 37 infants with (n = 20) or without (n = 17) probiotic administration was evaluated on D 3, and at 1, 3, and 12 mo by fluorescence in situ hybridization-flow cytometry (FISH-FC), PCR, and bacteriological culture methods. They represent consecutive subjects of an ongoing double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on a probiotic formula (LGG and Bifidobacterium longum) administered during the first 6 mo of life. Despite varying composition in each baby, there was a general bacterial colonization pattern in the first year. Bifidobacteria increased markedly (p = 0.0003) with a parallel decrease in Enterobacteriaceae (p < 0.001) and Bacteroides-Prevotella (p = 0.005) populations. Eubacterium rectale-Clostridium coccoides (p < 0.001) and Atopobium (p = 0.039) groups also gradually increased. This overall pattern was unaffected by probiotic administration (p > 0.05). B. longum (p = 0.005) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (p < 0.001) were detected more frequently in probiotic group during supplementation, but no difference after supplementation had ceased (p > 0.05). Cultured lactic acid bacteria were also more numerous in the probiotic-administered babies during treatment period (log CFU/g 8.4 versus 7.4; p = 0.035). Our results indicate that supplemented strains could be detected but did not persist in the bowel once probiotic administration had ceased.

Comparison of termination-of-resuscitation guidelines for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore EMS.

CONTEXT: Termination of resuscitation (TOR) in the field for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) can reduce unnecessary transport to hospital and increase availability of resources for other patients. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of three TOR guidelines for Basic Life Support-Defibrillator (BLS-D) providers when applied to cardiac arrest patients in the Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Epidemiology (CARE) study. DESIGN: This prospective cohort study involved all OHCA patients attended by BLS-D providers in a large urban center. The data analyses were conducted secondarily on these prospectively collected data. Three TOR guidelines proposed by Marsden et al. [BMJ 1995;311:49-51], Petrie [CJEM 2001;3:186-92] and Verbeek et al. [Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:671-8] were applied to show the relationship between the guidelines and actual survival. RESULTS: From 1 October 2001 to 14 October 2004, 2269 patients were enrolled into the study. Thirty-two (1.4%) survived to hospital discharge. For the 3 TOR guidelines, sensitivity was 93.8% (95%CI=79.9-98.3) (Petrie), 81.3% (95%CI=64.7-91.1) (Verbeek) and 90.6% (95%CI=75.8-96.8) (Marsden). Negative predictive value was 99.7% (95%CI=99.0-100.0) (Petrie), 99.6% (95%CI=99.2-99.8) (Verbeek) and 99.8% (95%CI=99.4-99.9) (Marsden). Application of these guidelines would have resulted in transport of 68.4% (Petrie), 31.3% (Verbeek) and 36.1% (Marsden) of cases. The Petrie guidelines would have recommended TOR in two patients who eventually survived. Similarly TOR was recommended in six patients for Verbeek and three patients for Marsden who eventually survived. CONCLUSION: We found all three TOR guidelines to have high sensitivity and negative predictive value. However the specificity and transport rates varied greatly. Application of any TOR guidelines may be affected by local EMS and population factors which should be considered in any policy decision.

Survival outcomes with the introduction of intravenous epinephrine in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The benefit of epinephrine in cardiac arrest is controversial and has not been conclusively shown in any human clinical study. We seek to assess the effect of introducing intravenous epinephrine on the survival outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in an emergency medical services (EMS) system that previously did not use intravenous medications. METHODS: This observational, prospective, before-after clinical study constitutes phase II of the Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Epidemiology project. Included were all patients who are older than 8 years, with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest conveyed by the national emergency ambulance service. The comparison between the 2 intervention groups for survival to discharge was made with logistic regression and expressed in terms of the odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: From October 1, 2002, to October 14, 2004, 1,296 patients were enrolled into the study, with 615 in the pre-epinephrine and 681 in the epinephrine phase. Demographic and EMS characteristics were similar in both groups. Forty-four percent of patients received intravenous epinephrine in the epinephrine phase. There was no significant difference in survival to discharge (pre-epinephrine 1.0%; epinephrine 1.6%; OR 1.7 [95% CI 0.6 to 4.5]; adjusted for rhythm OR 2.0 [95% CI 0.7 to 5.5]); return of circulation (pre-epinephrine 17.9%; epinephrine 15.7%; OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.6 to 1.2]), or survival to admission (pre-epinephrine 7.5%; epinephrine 7.5%; OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.7 to 1.5]). There was a minimal increase in scene time in the epinephrine phase (10.3 minutes versus 10.7 minutes; 95% CI of difference 0.02 to 0.94 minutes). CONCLUSION: We were unable to establish a significant survival benefit with the introduction of intravenous epinephrine to an EMS system. More research is needed to determine the effectiveness of drugs such as epinephrine in resuscitation.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring in primary health care facilities in Singapore.

OBJECTIVES: To study out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) occurring in primary healthcare facilities (HCF) in Singapore and to compare these with arrests occurring in the community. METHODS: This prospective observational study was part of the Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Epidemiology (CARE) project. Included were all patients with OHCA occurring in HCF. Patient characteristics, cardiac arrest circumstances, EMS response and outcomes were recorded according to the Utstein style. RESULTS: From 1 October 2001 to 14 October 2004, the data from 2428 subjects were received of which 138 patients were OHCA occurring in HCF. This is an incidence of 1.12/100,000 population per year and constituted 6.0% of all OHCA. Arrest occurring in HCF were more likely to be witnessed (p<0.01), or have bystander CPR (p<0.01). The HCF group was also more likely to receive CPR with both compression and ventilation (p<0.01) and have a non-trauma cause of arrest (p=0.03). HCF arrests also had a shorter collapse to call (EMS number) than the non-HCF group (HCF 1.54min versus non-HCF 5.36min, p=0.01). However, no HCF patient received defibrillation prior to EMS arrival. HCF patients were more likely to have return of spontaneous circulation at any time (p=0.05), survival to hospital admission (p<0.01) and survival to discharge (p<0.01) compared to non-HCF patients. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that primary health care providers do have an important role locally in managing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We propose an initiative to encourage early defibrillation by primary health care providers.