ABSTRACT
Routine site inspections are often conducted to gather data on radiation contamination on the surface and below ground near nuclear waste disposal areas. These observations are used to calculate total radiation inventory and its spatial delineation. The statistical kriging approach is often used to spatially interpolate contamination data, and it generates predictions at unsampled sites that are then utilized to calculate the contaminated site's radiation inventory. The kriging output, however, creates a point estimate of the inventory that omits the potential uncertainties from other sources. This paper presents a method for assessing the uncertainty of radiation inventories based on the geostatistical conditional simulation method - a simulation methodology that takes into account the observations made at the sampled sites. The radiation inventories' histograms are generated by conducting many conditional simulations of the projection map using a fitted kriging model. A practical implementation of the suggested approach is shown by evaluating total beta inventories and their spatial delineation using groundwater monitoring data at a nuclear waste disposal site.
Subject(s)
Radiation Monitoring , Radioactive Waste , Refuse Disposal , Computer Simulation , Uncertainty , Waste Disposal FacilitiesABSTRACT
The adverse impacts of particulate air pollution and ground-level ozone on public health and the environment have motivated the development of Canada Wide Standards (CWS) on air quality. In cost-benefit analysis of air-quality options, valuation of reduction in mortality is a critical step as it accounts for almost 80% of the total benefits and any bias in its evaluation can significantly skew the outcome of the analysis. The overestimation of benefits is a source of concern since it has the potential of diverting valuable resources from other needs to support broader health care objectives, education, and social services that contribute to enhanced quality of life. We have developed a framework of reasoning for the assessment of risk-reduction initiatives that would support the public interest and enhance safety and quality of life. This article presents the Life Quality Index (LQI) as a tool to quantify the level of expenditure beyond which it is no longer justifiable to spend resources in the name of safety. It is shown that the LQI is a compound social indicator comprising societal wealth and longevity, and it is also equivalent to a utility function consistent with the basic principles of welfare economics and decision analysis. The LQI approach overcomes several shortcomings of the method used by the CWS Development Committee and provides guidance on the compliance costs that can be justified to meet the Standards.