ABSTRACT
Real-world data on the therapeutic management of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) patients are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the HE medications prescribed in an Italian cohort of HE patients post-discharge and to assess the real-world rifaximin adherence and persistence over 1 year. An observation retrospective study was conducted using data retrieved from outpatient pharmaceutical databases and hospital discharge records of the Campania region. For all subjects hospitalized for HE during 2019 (cohort 1), the HE medications prescribed within 60 days after discharge were evaluated. Adherence (proportion of days covered, PDC) and persistence were estimated for rifaximin 550 mg incident users over 1 year (cohort 2). Patients with PDC ≥80% were considered adherents. Persistence was defined as the period of time from the first rifaximin prescription to the date of discontinuation. Discontinuation was assessed using the permissible gap method. In cohort 1, 544 patients were identified; 58.5% received rifaximin while 15.6% only received non-absorbable disaccharides and 25.9% did not receive any HE medications. In cohort 2, 650 users were selected; only 54.5% were adherents and 35% were persistent users at 1 year. This real-world study highlights that quality improvement in therapeutic management is needed to potentially improve the outcomes of HE patients.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Since its approval in Italy in 1987, rifaximin has been licensed in over 30 countries for the treatment of a wide range gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of the study was to analyze the real world use of rifaximin 200 mg in the Campania region. METHODS: An observation retrospective study was conducted analysing the prescriptions of rifaximin received by the subjects ≥18 years old resident in the Campania Region. For each user the first rifaximin prescription in 2019 was defined as index date. All the prescriptions during the 12 months following the index date were analyzed. The subjects were categorized according to the number of packages/year received (1-4, 5-12, 13-24, >24). RESULTS: 231,207 subjects received at least one package/year of rifaximin 200 mg with a prevalence of use of 4.9% and a total annual expenditure of 9.2 million euros. The 73.9% of users received 1-4 packages/year, 16.4% between 5-12 packages/year and 7.7% between 13-24 packages/year. The 2.0% of the users received more than 24 packages/year with an incidence on total expenditure equal to 14.8% (5% is due to those who received more than 40 packages/year). DISCUSSION: About two thirds of rifaximin users received no more than three packages, presumably for the treatment of the infectious gastroenteritis or diarrheal syndromes, while 24% received 5-24 packages/year probably for the relapsing chronic intestinal pathologies. The 15% of the expenditure and consumption is related to subjects receiving more than 24 packages/year, probably due to the treatment of chronic liver diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of rifaximin 200 mg should be further investigated in different recurrent chronic diseases, especially to verify which schemes and dosages are used in real life compared to those tested in clinical trials.
