Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H ; 231(11): 1064-1068, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28814154

ABSTRACT

Body segment parameters are used in many different applications in ergonomics as well as in dynamic modelling of the musculoskeletal system. Body segment parameters can be defined using different methods, including techniques that involve time-consuming manual measurements of the human body, used in conjunction with models or equations. In this study, a scanning technique for measuring subject-specific body segment parameters in an easy, fast, accurate and low-cost way was developed and validated. The scanner can obtain the body segment parameters in a single scanning operation, which takes between 8 and 10 s. The results obtained with the system show a standard deviation of 2.5% in volumetric measurements of the upper limb of a mannequin and 3.1% difference between scanning volume and actual volume. Finally, the maximum mean error for the moment of inertia by scanning a standard-sized homogeneous object was 2.2%. This study shows that a low-cost system can provide quick and accurate subject-specific body segment parameter estimates.


Subject(s)
Anthropometry , Lasers , Costs and Cost Analysis , Ergonomics , Humans , Manikins
2.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 30(8): 839-46, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26139549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Driving is one of the most common everyday tasks and the rotator cuff muscles are the primary shoulder stabilisers. Muscle forces during driving are not currently known, yet knowledge of these would influence important clinical advice such as return to activities after surgery. The aim of this study is to quantify shoulder and rotator cuff muscle forces during driving in different postures. METHODS: A musculoskeletal modelling approach is taken, using a modified driving simulator in combination with an upper limb musculoskeletal model (UK National Shoulder Model). Motion data and external force vectors were model inputs and upper limb muscle and joint forces were the outputs. FINDINGS: Comparisons of the predicted glenohumeral joint forces were compared to in vivo literature values, with good agreement demonstrated (61 SD 8% body weight mean peak compared to 60 SD 1% body weight mean peak). High muscle activation was predicted in the rotator cuff muscles; particularly supraspinatus (mean 55% of the maximum and up to 164 SD 27 N). This level of loading is up to 72% of mean failure strength for supraspinatus repairs, and could therefore be dangerous for some cases. Statistically significant and large differences are shown to exist in the joint and muscle forces for different driving positions as well as steering with one or both hands (up to 46% body weight glenohumeral joint force). INTERPRETATION: These conclusions should be a key consideration in rehabilitating the shoulder after surgery, preventing specific upper limb injuries and predicting return to driving recommendations.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving , Muscle Strength , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Rotator Cuff/physiology , Shoulder Joint/physiology , Shoulder/physiology , Adult , Arm Injuries/prevention & control , Arm Injuries/rehabilitation , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Male , Mechanical Phenomena , Movement , Posture , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...