Factors Predicting Prognosis in Metastatic Grade 1 Gastro-entero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) has steadily increased. These tumors are considered relatively indolent even when metastatic. What determines survival outcomes in such situations is understudied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained NET clinic database, to include patients of metastatic grade 1 GEP-NET, from January 2018 to December 2021, to assess factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of the 589 patients of GEP-NET treated during the study period, 100 were grade 1, with radiological evidence of distant metastasis. The median age was 50 years, with 67% being men. Of these, 15 patients were observed, while 85 patients received treatment in the form of surgery (n = 32), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (n = 50), octreotide LAR (n = 22), and/or chemotherapy (n = 4), either as a single modality or multi-modality treatment. The median (PFS) was 54.5 months. The estimated 3-year PFS and 3-year overall survival rates were 72.3% (SE 0.048) and 93.4% (SE 0.026), respectively. On Cox regression, a high liver tumor burden was the only independent predictor of PFS (OR 3.443, p = 0.014). The 5-year OS of patients with concomitant extra-hepatic disease was significantly lower than that of patients with liver-limited disease (70.7% vs. 100%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: A higher burden of liver disease is associated with shorter PFS in patients with metastatic grade I GEP-NETs. The OS is significantly lower in patients with associated extrahepatic involvement. These parameters may justify a more aggressive treatment approach in metastatic grade 1 GEP-NETs.

Surgical resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma and those beyond BCLC: systematic review with proposed management algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for the sixth most common cancer and ranks third in mortality worldwide with inhomogeneity in terms of resection for advanced-stage disease. METHODS: A systematic review of published literature using the PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar databases from 1995 to 2020 was conducted to identify studies that reported outcomes of resection for solitary HCC > 10 cm, BCLC B/C, and multinodular HCC. Our aim was to assess overall survival for resection, identify poor prognostic factors, and to compare it to trans-arterial chemotherapy (TACE) where data was available. RESULTS: Eighty-nine articles were included after a complete database search in the systematic review as per our predefined criteria. Analysis revealed a 5-year overall survival of 33.5% for resection of HCC > 10 cm, 41.7% for BCLC B, 23.3% for BCLC C, and 36.6% for multinodular HCC. Peri-operative mortality ranged from 0 to 6.9%. Studies comparing resection versus TACE for BCLC B/C had a survival of 40% versus 17%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review justifies hepatic resection wherever feasible for hepatocellular carcinomas > 10 cm, BCLC B, BCLC C, and multinodular tumors. In addition, we identified and proposed an algorithm with five poor prognostic criteria in this group of patients who may benefit from adjuvant TACE.

Oncologic Liver Resections in a Geriatric Population: Peri-operative, Long-Term and Quality-of-Life Outcomes-Experience from a High-Volume Centre in India.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients can often be overlooked as candidates for a major hepatic resection, by virtue of their age. To enable better patient selection for hepatic resections in this age group, we analysed the outcomes of liver resections in elderly patients to identify any potential prognostic factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of hepatic resections from 1 January 2010 to 31 October 2021 and analysed the post-operative outcomes in patients aged 65 years or older. Short-term outcomes were analysed in terms of length of hospital stay, 90-day major morbidity, and 90-day mortality. Long-term outcome was defined by the disease-free survival, overall survival and quality of life. RESULTS: Over a period of 11 years, 170 elderly patients underwent oncologic liver resections, of which 68 (40%) underwent a major hepatectomy. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 32.8% and 5.3%, respectively. Extent of hepatic resection, increasing age, concomitant resection of other organs and a biliary-enteric anastomosis were independent predictors for poor immediate post-operative outcomes. Median disease-free survival and overall survival were 30 months and 78 months, respectively. The global health status was excellent in majority of patients with a mean score of 88.62. CONCLUSION: Major oncologic liver resections can be performed in well-selected geriatric population with acceptable peri-operative, long-term and quality-of-life outcomes.

Gender discrimination in surgical oncology: An in-house appraisal.

Introduction: Gender discrimination (GD) though rarely blatant, may present indirectly within a surgical department in the form of subtle inequities, differing standards, and bias. GD encompasses a wide spectrum including academic development, surgical opportunities and sexual harassment. Methods: We conducted an online survey to analyse the perceived incidence of GD in the surgical oncology department at a tertiary care cancer centre in India. The questionnaire consisted of 15 questions and was mailed to the entire department including trainees and faculty. Anonymity was maintained while collecting the data only of the participants' gender and whether they were faculty or trainee. Collated responses were analysed using proportions. Results: The questionnaire was sent out to 200 recipients of whom 56% (112/200) responded via an online survey. Respondents included 84% of faculty (42/50) and 46.6% of trainees (70/150). GD was perceived by 28% of female trainees (7/25) as compared to 6.6% of male trainees (3/45), whereas amongst faculty, GD was perceived by 26.6% of female faculty (4/15) compared to 14.8% of male faculty (3/27). Approximately 13% of our trainees and 12% of our faculty mentioned that GD affected their professional performance or mental well-being. GD was experienced in terms of work experience and opportunities by a majority of trainees (13%) and faculty (9.5%). There was a significant lack of awareness about recourse to an institutional grievance committee by trainees (47%) compared to faculty (14%). About 7% of trainees and 12% of faculty acknowledged that they may have been responsible for intentional/unintentional GD. Conclusion: Gender discrimination can present in subtle or overt fashion in surgical departments and requires active sustained efforts to allow both genders to feel equally empowered. Establishing a system to objectively evaluate gender equity while avoiding stereotyping for certain roles can help minimize GD.

Node positivity in T1b gallbladder cancer: A high volume centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Identification of early stage gallbladder cancer (GBC) is difficult with simple cholecystectomy being considered curative for T1a GBC but T1b requires radical cholecystectomy due to chances of lymph node metastasis. However there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy for T1b disease. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of GBC patients operated at our institute from March 2010 to March 2021 was conducted. Only patients with proven gallbladder adenocarcinoma on final histopathology report were included. RESULTS: A total of 1245 patients of suspected GBC who underwent surgery during this period with 76 patients of T1b stage were analysed. We divided the group into a node positive cohort (n = 16, 9 received neoadjuvant treatment due to uptake in periportal nodes and 7 patients were pN1) and a node negative cohort (n = 60). The median nodal harvest was 8 nodes (2-24 nodes). Considering the radiological and pathological parameters, the rate of lymph node positivity was 21% (16/76). The overall major morbidity was 5.2% and there was no mortality. After a median follow up of 47.5 months, 3-year OS and DFS of the node negative and positive cohort was 96.7%, 91.7% and 75% and 62.5% (p = 0.058). The node positive cohort had 43% recurrences whereas the node negative cohort had 8.3% with all recurrences limited to periportal lymph nodes, distant nodes or liver metastasis. CONCLUSION: Nodal positivity for T1b gall bladder cancer ranges around 21% and radical surgery with complete peri -portal lymphadenectomy should be considered as standard of care.

Impact of preoperative COVID infection on the outcomes of planned curative-intent cancer surgeries in the second wave of the pandemic from a tertiary care center in India.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic was an unforeseen calamity. Sudden disruption of nonemergency services led to disruption of treatment across all specialties. Oncology revolves around the tenet of timely detection and treatment. Disruption of any sort will jeopardize cure rates. The time interval between coronavirus infection and cancer surgery is variable and needs to be tailored to avoid the progression of the disease. METHODS: We analyzed the impact of preoperative coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on the planned cancer surgery, delay, disease progression, and change of intent of treatment from April 1 to May 31, 2021 at a tertiary care center. All preoperative positive patients were retested after 2 weeks and were considered for surgery if the repeat test was negative and asymptomatic. FINDINGS: Our study included 432 preoperative patients of which 91 (21%) were COVID-19 positive. Amongst this cohort, 76% were operated and the morbidity and mortality were comparable to the COVID-19 negative cohort. Around 10% of the COVID-19 positive were lost to follow up and 10% had disease progression and were deemed palliative INTERPRETATION: SARS-CoV-2 infection has adversely impacted cancer care and a 2-week waiting period postinfection seems to be a safe interval in asymptomatic individuals to consider radical cancer surgery.

Desmoid fibromatosis: is the current picture changing?

Desmoid fibromatosis is a locally aggressive tumor with an unpredictable clinical course. Surgery was once the mainstay of treatment, but the treatment protocol has been constantly evolving and currently active surveillance is the front-line approach. There have been significant insights into the molecular biology with the addition of mutational analysis of CTNNB1 adding to prognostic information. We present a review of the literature with current practice guidelines, also including novel therapeutic targets and ongoing clinical trials, to unravel the next step in the management of sporadic desmoid fibromatosis.

Lay abstract Desmoid fibromatosis is an aggressive local tumor with continuously changing treatment paradigms. It requires MRI with biopsy for diagnosis and follow-up. Usually the tumor responds to a 'wait and watch' approach in most patients with either stable disease or regression on follow-up; a surgical plan is made only after multidisciplinary discussion, as surgery does not provide additional benefit in most patients. After a period of wait and watch, if there is disease progression, patients can be kept on medical management such as chemotherapy. Currently we have novel drugs for medical management like tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which result in disease stabilization in a majority of patients. In order to reduce the morbidity of treatment, it is essential for the patient to be on continuous follow-up and for clinicians to be updated with the continuously changing management of this disease.

Artificial intelligence in perioperative management of major gastrointestinal surgeries.

Artificial intelligence (AI) demonstrated by machines is based on reinforcement learning and revolves around the usage of algorithms. The purpose of this review was to summarize concepts, the scope, applications, and limitations in major gastrointestinal surgery. This is a narrative review of the available literature on the key capabilities of AI to help anesthesiologists, surgeons, and other physicians to understand and critically evaluate ongoing and new AI applications in perioperative management. AI uses available databases called "big data" to formulate an algorithm. Analysis of other data based on these algorithms can help in early diagnosis, accurate risk assessment, intraoperative management, automated drug delivery, predicting anesthesia and surgical complications and postoperative outcomes and can thus lead to effective perioperative management as well as to reduce the cost of treatment. Perioperative physicians, anesthesiologists, and surgeons are well-positioned to help integrate AI into modern surgical practice. We all need to partner and collaborate with data scientists to collect and analyze data across all phases of perioperative care to provide clinical scenarios and context. Careful implementation and use of AI along with real-time human interpretation will revolutionize perioperative care, and is the way forward in future perioperative management of major surgery.

Portal Annular Pancreas (PAP): an Underestimated Devil in Pancreatic Surgery-Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is an anatomic variation due to aberrant fusion of the ventral and dorsal pancreatic buds around the portal vein. In this article, we present a case report with a systematic review of literature of patients undergoing major pancreatic surgery with associated PAP. We also intend to discuss and suggest possible surgical strategies to minimise major postoperative complications. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the terms "circumportal," "periportal," "pancreas," "annular pancreas," "portal annular pancreas" and "pancreas anomaly." All articles describing portal annular pancreas with surgical resection were included. RESULTS: We identified a total of 53 patients of PAP from 29 articles, who underwent pancreatic resection with a median age of 65 years. POPF (postoperative pancreatic fistula) was demonstrated in 42.55% of patients and 34% had CR (clinically relevant)-POPF. Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic stump was reconstructed in all patients with either pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy. Standard line of pancreatic transection, i.e., division of anteportal portion at the pancreatic neck and stapling of the retroportal process, resulted in 71% incidence of CR-POPF, whereas it was only 16% when extended resection was performed to achieve single pancreatic stump and 12.5% when retroportal portion was sutured or ligated. Amongst distal pancreatic resections, 66% had POPF and 33% developed CR-POPF. CONCLUSION: It is of utmost importance for pancreatic surgeons to diligently look for and identify PAP in the preoperative imaging. Additional imaging in the form of MRCP helps to define abnormal pancreatic ductal anatomy. Surgeons need to be cognisant of pancreatic stump management in patients with PAP to reduce associated higher rates of POPF.

Peri-operative, long-term, and quality of life outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in the elderly: greater justification for periampullary cancer compared to pancreatic head cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is more challenging in the elderly. METHODS: Data of patients undergoing PD above 70 years of age was analysed to study short and long-term outcomes along with the quality of life parameters (QOL). RESULTS: Out of 1271 PDs performed, 94 (7%) patients were 70 years or more. American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) scores were higher in comparison to patients below 70 years (ASA 1;20% vs. 54% and ASA 2&3;80% vs. 46%, p < 0.001). The postoperative 90-day mortality rate of 5.3% and morbidity (Clavein Grade III and IV of 27%) was higher but non-significant compared to 3.9% (p = 0.50) and 20% (p = 0.11) in patients less than 70 years. The median survival of 40 months was significantly better for periampullary carcinoma when compared to 15 months in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (p < 0.0001). Patients, less than 70 years had significantly better 3-year survival; 64% vs 43% with periampullary etiology (p < 0.01) and 29% vs 0% with PDAC (p < 0.0001). QLQ-PAN 26 questionnaire responses were suggestive of good long term QOL in these patients. CONCLUSION: Although PD is safe and feasible in the elderly population with good long-term QOL, postoperative morbidity and mortality can be slightly higher and long-term survival significantly lower.

Compliance and perception about personal protective equipment among health care workers involved in the surgery of COVID-19 negative cancer patients during the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) are at risk of getting infected while at work, for example, operating room (OR), hence it is pertinent that they don all the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize the chance of getting infected. METHODS: A COVID-19 specific briefing and debriefing form was created and used in the OR along with the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist to reinforce the use of appropriate PPE. An audit was subsequently done to understand the compliance to PPE use, followed by a survey based on the findings of the audit to understand the issues related to noncompliance. RESULTS: The form was used in 183 out of the 238 (77%) surgeries performed during a months' time. The overall compliance for PPE usage was 96.3%. Noncompliance was seen most often for eye protection (45/567) (P = .01). The survey revealed that this was mostly among surgeons mainly due to discomfort, poor visibility, and frequent fogging. CONCLUSIONS: Our HCW were adapting well to the new normal of donning appropriate PPE in the OR, except for the eye protection due to discomfort and visibility related issues. This is important to know so that necessary changes could be introduced to better the compliance.

Centralisation of Pancreatoduodenectomy in India: Where Do We Stand?

BACKGROUND: The volume-outcome relationship dictates that high-volume centres lead to improved patient outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). We conducted a retrospective review to fathom the situation in India for PD and whether referral to high-volume centres would make a positive impact. METHOD: A systematic literature search in MEDLINE was performed, and all articles published from Indian centres from 01.03.2008 to 30.11.2019 were scrutinised. Any series with less than 20 patients, case reports, abstracts, unpublished data and personal communications were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 36 unique series including 6226 patients from 24 institutes across India were identified. Amongst the 24 institutes, 2 institutes reported less than 10 cases/year, 11 reported 10-25 cases/year and 11 reported ≥26 cases/year. Overall perioperative morbidity was 42.4%, 43.4% and 41% for centres doing <10, 10-25 and ≥26 cases/year, respectively. Operative mortality also improved with increasing number of cases/year (5.1% vs. 6.6% vs. 3.2%, respectively). CONCLUSION: With increasing volume of cases per year, trend towards improved PD outcomes is observed. To optimise the use of healthcare facilities, it would be pragmatic to consider building an organised referral system for complex surgeries to deliver unsurpassed patient care with maximum utilisation of the available healthcare infrastructure.