High-throughput asparaginase activity assay in serum of children with leukemia.

Asparaginase is an antineoplastic agent used in combination therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The asparaginase activity measured in serum reflects the effectiveness of the drug. However, the wide inter-individual variability in the pharmacokinetics of asparaginase suggests that the serum activity should be closely monitored in patients during therapy. In order to identify patients with low asparaginase exposure during treatment, a fast, sensitive, and high-throughput assay is required for measuring asparaginase activity in patient sera. In this study, asparaginase activity was determined by monitoring the enzymatically-coupled oxidation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) to NAD(+) in a 96-well format. The rate of disappearance of NADH (ΔmOD/minute) was directly proportional to the activity of asparaginase, and the linear range of the assay was established from 0.025 to 2.2 IU/mL (R(2) = 0.998) with a reportable range that was extended to 4.0 IU/mL by dilution with serum albumin. Inter-assay precision was established (low control CV% = 8.8, high control CV% = 9.0), as was intra-assay precision (low control CV% = 3.3, high control CV% = 2.7). The method is high-throughput and provides a broader linear range of detection compared to previously described assays. The speed, ease, and accuracy of the assay make it suitable for assessing serum asparaginase activity after standard doses of native E. coli, Erwinia, and PEGylated E. coli asparaginase given to children during the treatment of leukemia.

Pharmacokinetics of erlotinib for the treatment of high-grade glioma in a pediatric patient with cystic fibrosis: case report and review of the literature.

A 12-year-old girl with cystic fibrosis was diagnosed with a high-grade glioma after radiographic and biopsy results confirmed the primary intracranial lesion. She was treated with single-agent erlotinib during and after daily localized radiation therapy. Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted to assess the effect of pancreatic enzyme deficiency and intestinal malabsorption secondary to cystic fibrosis on the bioavailability of orally administered erlotinib, a lipophilic drug. Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma samples from days 1 and 8 demonstrated that absorption of oral erlotinib was not affected by the patient's cystic fibrosis when the drug was given concomitantly with pancreatic enzyme replacement. When pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis are receiving erlotinib or other lipophilic oral drugs, continued supplementation of pancreatic enzymes is recommended, with therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma drug concentrations when feasible, and close observation for therapeutic responses and adverse effects.

Phase I study of the combination of topotecan and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We have shown in xenograft studies that the antitumor activities of topotecan and irinotecan are highly schedule- and dose-dependent, with a high frequency of response at low, protracted dose schedules. Preclinical and clinical data suggest that topotecan and irinotecan have different antitumor activities and mechanisms of resistance, and non-overlapping toxicities, providing a rationale for their combination. Combining both agents may increase the amount of camptothecin delivered to the tumor, without additive toxicity. METHODS: We conducted a phase I study in children with refractory solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan when administered with a targeted systemic exposure (TSE) of topotecan and to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of this combination. Irinotecan was administered IV over 60 min followed by topotecan over 30 min daily for 5 days for two consecutive weeks. We initially fixed the topotecan-TSE to 80+/-10 ng*h/ml and investigated the ability to escalate irinotecan (starting dose 16 mg/m2/d). Topotecan and irinotecan pharmacokinetics were determined. RESULTS: Eleven patients (median age 10 years) were enrolled. Owing to DLT, irinotecan was de-escalated to 12 (level -1; n = 3) and 9 (level -2; n = 3) mg/m2/day, and topotecan-TSE was reduced to 60+/-10 ng*h/ml (level -3; n = 2). DLTs were neutropenia (n = 8), typhlitis (n = 5), and skin rash (n = 1). MTD could not be reached. Median (range) irinotecan and topotecan lactone systemic clearances were 50.3 (16.6-76.2) l/h/m2 and 27.6 (14.7-55.9) l/h/m2, respectively. The pharmacokinetics profile of each agent was similar to that seen in previous single agent studies. One patient with neuroblastoma and one with rhabdomyosarcoma had a partial and a complete response, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite promising antitumor activity, the combination of topotecan and irinotecan given on a protracted schedule does not warrant further development in children due to unacceptable toxicity.

A substrate specific functional polymorphism of human gamma-glutamyl hydrolase alters catalytic activity and methotrexate polyglutamate accumulation in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cells.

We found a significant inverse relationship between gamma-glutamyl hydrolase (GGH) activity and the accumulation of long-chain methotrexate polyglutamates (MTXPG4-7) in non-hyperdiploid B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) cells after uniform treatment with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) (1 g/m i.v.). To identify genetic polymorphisms that alter the function of human GGH, we sequenced the GGH exons of genomic DNA from children with ALL, who had a 7.8-fold range of GGH activity in their ALL cells at diagnosis. A single nucleotide polymorphism (452C>T, T127I) was found among patients with low GGH activity, but not found in patients with high GGH activity. Computational modelling indicated that the T127I substitution alters the molecular surface conformation at the catalytic cleft-tail on GGH, which is predicted to alter binding affinity with long chain but not short-chain methotrexate polyglutamates. Enzyme kinetic analysis of heterologously expressed GGH revealed a significantly higher Km (2.7-fold) and lower catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km reduced 67%) of the T127I variant compared to wild-type GGH using long-chain MTXPG5 as substrate, but not a significant change with short-chain MTXPG2. The 452C>T single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was also associated with lower GGH activity in hyperdiploid B-lineage and T lineage ALL cells. Caucasians [10.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.7-13.3%; n = 155] were found to have a significantly higher frequency of the Ile allele than African-Americans (4.4%; 95% CI 1.2-7.5%; n = 80) (P = 0.033). These studies demonstrate a substrate specific functional SNP (452C>T) in the human GGH gene that is associated with lower catalytic activity and higher accumulation of long-chain MTX-PG in leukaemia cells of patients treated with HDMTX.

High-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics and outcome of children and young adults with osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is used frequently in combination regimens that include nephrotoxic chemotherapy. The authors evaluated the impact of factors such as age and prior nephrotoxic agents on MTX pharmacokinetics in children and young adults with osteosarcoma and examined whether MTX pharmacokinetic parameters were associated with outcome. METHODS: The authors evaluated MTX pharmacokinetics in 140 patients who were treated with 1083 courses of HDMTX on 3 consecutive studies of multiagent chemotherapy at a single institution. The influence of MTX pharmacokinetics on the outcome of 107 patients with localized disease was examined. RESULTS: Mean peak MTX concentrations > or = 1000 microM were achieved in 135 patients (96%). MTX clearance was decreased after cisplatin therapy (P = 0.01), after cisplatin in combination with ifosfamide therapy (P < 0.0001), and after MTX therapy (P = 0.003). In patients with localized osteosarcoma, a higher mean MTX area under the curve, a higher mean peak concentration of MTX, a longer mean time above a threshold concentration (500 microM), and a lower mean MTX clearance were associated with lower probability of event-free survival (EFS). Patients who had a mean peak MTX plasma concentration > 1500 microM were found to have a worse outcome (estimated 5-year EFS, 58.5% +/- 6.7%) compared with patients who had a mean peak concentration < or = 1500 microM (estimated 5-year EFS, 75.5% +/- 6.6%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: When HDMTX (12 g/m(2)) was used with multiagent therapy for patients with osteosarcoma, very high MTX exposures were associated with poorer outcome. The prospective evaluation of MTX pharmacokinetics and their relation to outcome in a large study is warranted to further substantiate the current findings and to elucidate the causative mechanism.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of topotecan administered orally once daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks to pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I trial of the injectable formulation of topotecan given orally once daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks (qd x 5 x 2) in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of two to six patients received oral topotecan at 0.8, 1.1, 1.4, 1.8, and 2.3 mg/m(2)/d every 28 days for a maximum of six courses. Twenty patients (median age, 10.6 years) received a total of 51 courses. Eight patients received topotecan capsules during course 2 only. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 2.3 mg/m(2)/d and consisted of prolonged grade 4 neutropenia (n = 2), grade 3 stomatitis as a result of radiation recall (n = 1), grade 3 hemorrhage (epistaxis) in the presence of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 1), and grade 3 diarrhea in the presence of Clostridium difficile infection (n = 1). Dose-limiting, prolonged grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in one patient at 1.4 mg/m(2)/d. Infrequent toxicities were mild nausea, vomiting, elevated liver ALT or AST, and rash. The maximum-tolerated dosage was 1.8 mg/m(2)/d; the mean (+/- standard deviation) area under the plasma concentration-time curve for topotecan lactone at this dosage was 20.9 +/- 8.4 ng/mL. h. The population mean (+/- standard error) oral bioavailability of the injectable formulation was 0.27 +/- 0.03; that of capsules was 0.36 +/- 0.06 (P =.16). Disease stabilized in nine of 19 assessable patients for 1.5 to 6 months. CONCLUSION: Oral topotecan (1.8 mg/m(2)/d) on a qd x 5 x 2 schedule is well tolerated and warrants additional testing in pediatric patients.

The importance of pharmacokinetic limited sampling models for childhood cancer drug development.

Since the development of effective chemotherapy for children with cancer, it has been recognized that the response of children to apparently identical therapy, both in terms of efficacy and toxicity, can vary widely. Our understanding of the interindividual differences in drug metabolism and disposition as significant determinants of drug response continues to evolve. An increasing area of clinical investigation is focused on studies to gain a better understanding of the variability in critical drug metabolic and elimination pathways and how this variability translates into varied pharmacological effects. Analyzing how drug metabolism and elimination are affected by patient characteristics such as age, sex, race, organ function, drug interactions, and, perhaps most importantly, genetic polymorphisms, is now a routine component of drug development studies. Recent advances in analytical methodologies, computer hardware, and pharmacokinetic software have improved our ability to conduct studies of the disposition of anticancer drugs in larger, more representative pediatric cancer populations. Along with advances in pharmacogenetics, the advances made in the conduct of pharmacokinetic studies in children with cancer have enabled establishment of sophisticated phenotype-genotype correlations, which may ultimately improve care. However, unique challenges and limitations remain that complicate the performance of pharmacokinetic studies in the child with cancer. This review addresses the need to perform pharmacokinetic studies throughout the drug development process in pediatric oncology patients, methods used to develop and validate limited sampling models, and selected examples of limited sampling models used in pharmacokinetic studies in children with cancer.