Synergy of Hydeal-D® and Hyaluronic Acid for Protecting and Restoring Urothelium: In Vitro Characterization.

Interstitial cystitis (IC) or painful bladder syndrome is a chronic dysfunction due to an inflammatory condition, characterized by bladder pain and urinary frequency. Currently, no gold standard therapy is available since IC does not respond to conventional ones. Given these premises, the aim of this work was the in vitro characterization of biological properties (mucoadhesion and anti-inflammatory activity) of a commercial product (HydealCyst-HydC) based on hyaluronic acid (HA) and the benzyl ester of HA (Hydeal-D®) intended for bladder instillation to restore and/or protect the urothelial layer of glycosamino glycans (GAGs). The in vitro characterization demonstrated that an interaction product is formed between HA and Hydeal-D® that has a role in the rheological behavior and mucoadhesive properties. HA was identified as a key component to form the mucoadhesive joint, while the interaction of HA with Hydeal-D® improved polysaccharide stability and prolonged the activity ex vivo. Moreover, HydC is cytocompatible with urothelial cells (HTB-4) and possesses an anti-inflammatory effect towards these cells by decreasing the secretion of IL-6 and IL-8, which were both increased in patients with IC, and by increasing the secretion of sulfated GAGs. These two findings, along with the resilience properties of the formulation due to mucoadhesion, suggest the active role of HydC in protecting and restoring urothelium homeostasis.

HA-based dermal filler: downstream process comparison, impurity quantitation by validated HPLC-MS analysis, and in vivo residence time study.

The success of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dermal fillers, with more than 2 million minimally invasive procedures conducted in 2016 in the US alone, is due to their hygroscopic properties of biocompatibility and reversibility. The type and density of HA cross-linkage, as well as the manufacturing technology, may influence not only the in vivo persistence but also the safety profile of dermal fillers. 1,4-Butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) is the cross-linker used in most market-leading HA fillers; 1,4-butanediol di-(propan-2,3-diolyl) ether (BDPE) is the major impurity obtained from the HA-BDDE cross-linking (HBC) process. In this work, a new process to obtain high purity HBC fillers was developed. A new HPLC-MS method was validated for the quantification of BDPE content in HBC dermal fillers. In vitro cytotoxicity of BDPE was evaluated in fibroblasts (IC50 = 0.48 mg/mL). The viscoelasticity was monitored during the shelf-life of the HBC-10% hydrogel and was correlated with in vitro hyaluronidase resistance and in vivo residence time in a rabbit model. This analysis showed that elasticity is the best parameter to predict the in vivo residence time. Finally, a series of parameters were investigated in certain marketed dermal fillers and were compared with the results of the HBC-10% hydrogel.

A new potential spreading factor: Streptomyces koganeiensis hyaluronidase. A comparative study with bovine testes hyaluronidase and recombinant human hyaluronidase of the HA degradation in ECM.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human hyaluronidase has been used in the interstitial matrix to promote the dispersion of therapeutics. The production and isolation of an extracellular hyaluronidase from Streptomyces koganeiensis (rHyal_Sk) has recently been described. METHODS: The specificity of rHyal_Sk has been assessed against heparan sulfate, chondroitin sulfates and sulfated HAs. The oligomers generated by HA degradation have been investigated by MALDI-TOF MS analysis. rHyal_Sk has been compared with BTH and PH20 in vitro, against cross-linked HA (ACP) and HA-aggrecan complex, and in vivo, by means of a diffusion assay in nude mice. RESULTS: Depolymerization of HA by rHyal_Sk gave tetra-, hexa- and octasaccharides in high yields. The reaction mechanism and the high HA specificity were demonstrated. The in vivo diffusion assay, supported by the in vitro tests, evidenced an initially enhanced enzymatic activity of rHyal_Sk compared to BTH and PH20. CONCLUSIONS: rHyal_Sk, compared to BTH and PH20, showed higher substrate specificity and no inhibition from GAGs sulfate, together with a superior performance for HA depolymerization in ECM. As better predictive tests for the in vivo activity of hyaluronidase we developed two assays based on the degradation of ACP or of the HA-aggrecan complex. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: rHyal_Sk is a new potential spreading factor for intradermal drug administration. Hyaluronidases of distinct classes, that show equivalent activities in a common turbidimetric assay, could have different potencies and dose-efficacies in vivo which influences the therapeutic effect. The new proposed in vitro tests are designed to obtain a predictive characterization of the enzyme activity in vivo.