Chitotriosidase and lysosomal enzymes as potential biomarkers of disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a survey clinic-based study.

The aim of this study was to determine if blood chitotriosidase (Chit) activity and lysosomal enzyme levels might represent markers of disease activity and progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). It is a survey clinic-based study performed in a tertiary ALS centre. Blood samples were obtained from 76 patients with ALS in different stages of the disease and from 106 healthy individuals serving as controls. Chit activity and the levels of acid alpha-glucosidase, acid alpha-galattosidase A, beta-glucocerebrosidase, and alpha-l-iduronidase were detected using the dried blood spots (DBS) technique. The CHIT1 genotype for exon 10 duplication and for the p.G102S variant was also determined. Chit activity was significantly higher in ALS patients than in healthy individuals. This difference was independent of the genotypes at CHIT1 functional variants. Chit were significantly higher in 34 rapidly progressing patients as compared to 42 with slowly progressive disease. Acid alpha-glucosidase was higher than normal and significantly correlated with the severity of the disease. Glucocerebrosidase and alpha-l-iduronidase activity were significantly lower in patients than in the controls. Alpha-galactosidase A was higher than normal only in rapidly progressing patients. We have employed a very simple and affordable laboratory test to measure blood Chit and lysosomal enzymes activity which could be easily included in the screening of ALS patients recruited in clinical trials. Remarkably, high levels of chitinase and alpha-galactosidase A could help to distinguish patients with fast progression from those with slow progression of the disease and possibly to follow the effects of treatments on neuroinflammation and autophagy.

Use of deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies to monitor diet compliance in childhood celiac disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate performance of serum antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides (a-DGPs) in detecting compliance with gluten-free diet (GFD) in children with celiac disease (CD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum samples were collected the same day of endoscopy in 95 children with CD and 106 controls. We preliminarily calculated the cutoff of a-DGP immunoglobulin A (IgA) and a-DGP IgA+G in our population by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Of 95 children with CD, 28 were studied during the first year after GFD introduction, with interview and serum collection every 3 months. In addition, serum samples were collected in 106 children with CD on GFD for more than 1 year (range 1-14). In both groups of children with CD on GFD, we compared a-DGP IgA and IgA+G performance in monitoring compliance with GFD with anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-tTG) IgA and anti-gliadin antibody (AGA) IgA. RESULTS: The cutoff resulted in 13.1 arbitrary units (AU) for a-DGP IgA (sensitivity 87.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 79%-92%, specificity 97.2, 95% CI 92%-99%) and 16.5 for a-DGP IgA+G (sensitivity 94.7, 95% CI 88%-98%, specificity 89.6, 95% CI 84%-95%). In the first year of GFD, at 6 to 8 months prevalence of positive a-DGPs was significantly higher in partially versus strictly compliant children, and at 9 to 12 months only prevalence of positive a-DGP IgA+G remained significantly higher. Moreover, at 9 to 12 months sensitivity to detect transgressions to GFD was 44% for a-DGP IgA and 100% for a-DGP IgA+G (P = 0.03). In the 106 children on GFD for more than 1 year, sensitivity to detect transgressions to GFD was 60% for a-DGP IgA and 76% for a-DGP IgA+G. Anti-tTG IgA and AGA IgA sensitivity was much lower (24% and 4%, respectively). The 4 tests showed comparable high specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Both a-DGPs showed higher sensitivity than anti-tTG IgA and AGA IgA in monitoring compliance with GFD, but a-DGP IgA+G seemed to perform better. a-DGPs did not outperform anti-tTG IgA for CD screening.